Kyle Rittenhouse trial...already disproving SO MANY LIES from the left

I kept hoping he’d at least admit something shown to him in black and white. Quoting the very section of the law didn’t make a dent in him, however. When I knew him in my prior days on this message board, I used to just keep smacking him around. It had no impact on him or his inability to be honest or engage in thoughtful/meaningful debate. I figured that possibly some other member might glean something from my effort.

Sadly, I tend to agree that his main (if not sole) purpose is trolling.
as are several in here. never answer any questions which is part of a true discussion and exchange with respect to a thread.
 
My opinion is that this motion should succeed on the merits.

1637172760312.webp
 
You're problem is not if he's guilty of murder. It's you not objecting to him killing BLM members. That's the whole theme through this case. That's how pathetic republicans are.

What evidence do you have that Rosenbaum was a BLM member?
 
You're problem is not if he's guilty of murder. It's you not objecting to him killing BLM members. That's the whole theme through this case. That's how pathetic republicans are.
who's that? Rosenbaum was in a jail hospital. Wasn't from there. And yet he's a blm member screaming the n-word? that guy?
 
THANK YOU!!
He pointed his rifle the first time after Rosenbaum threw the bag at him. Threatening him. No matter what the fat fk prosecutor says. It was in effort to hurt rittenhouse.

I also learned that someone using a skateboard to your head can't be called a weapon. wow.
 

and I still don't see rittenhouse until he runs into the parking lot with rosenbaum chasing him. Even the judge said he could watch that video for 100 times and still not see whatever the prosecution was trying to say.

The stop light interferes with the view prior to the chase.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom