Kirks killer got away

How do you know there wasn't an exit wound?.

There are video recordings on all 3 sides of kirk, none of them show an exit wound.


.. and a 30 06 round can slow for a myriad of reasons like hitting a small branch in a tree on the way to the target...

But there were no objects between Robinsons position and kirks position.

which could explain why the shot did not hit his head... there are just too many factors not considered in the videos...
And this theory that he was in a vest I don't get... I watched him walk onto the platform in a white T-shirt... I saw no vest...

He didn't have a vest, which helps debunking the deflection theory. If he had been wearing a ballistic plate, there is a scenario where the bullet could hit the top of the plate and deflect upward, without the plate, that scenario is almost impossible.
 
There are video recordings on all 3 sides of kirk, none of them show an exit wound.




But there were no objects between Robinsons position and kirks position.



He didn't have a vest, which helps debunking the deflection theory. If he had been wearing a ballistic plate, there is a scenario where the bullet could hit the top of the plate and deflect upward, without the plate, that scenario is almost impossible.
Explain the number of people who would have to be in on this... bullets can hit bone in the neck and come out his back at his waste... I've seen that happen... when a round enters the body it has a mind of its own...
And what's your point?... that his wife had him killed or Trump or what?.... the motive is what?....
 
The more I see information come out about this shooting, the more im thinking that Robinson isnt the guy. Several analysis videos ive watched are making me rethink.

First, the wound on his neck is much too large. It appears to be about the size of a half dollar, the entry wound for a .30-06 would only be about just a little larger than 1/4 of an inch. Meaning the neck wound we see would have to be the exit wound, which is plausible because, in about a 6 inch to 8 inch diameter (the thickness of the neck) wouldn't be enough tissue to deform the bullet much. If it did deform much at all, the exit wound would have been MUCH larger and more violent.

However, it couldn't have been a .30-06 because if it were, it would have passed through his neck, out his back, through the tent behind him and probably through anyone who was standing behind that. As it is, we dont see any exit wounds from the back, if there were, there would have been a spray of blood out the back, which we didnt see.

Im no ballistics expert, im just going off of what I've seen in the numerous analysis videos ive seen, but something caught my attention today. I was watching one video that said that it might be hard for them to convict Robinson of murder because the whole thing doesnt add up. It appears there was a wider conspiracy, with the old man at first, and then robinson who may have been cover for the real shooter to get away. Also several people in a discord chat room and even more in a steam chat room

Its obvious that robinson was involved, but there may be some doubt about him being the shooter.

Thoughts?

No idea, but you bring up good points.
Thanks!

keal.webp
 
Explain the number of people who would have to be in on this... bullets can hit bone in the neck and come out his back at his waste... I've seen that happen... when a round enters the body it has a mind of its own...

Maybe with a small calibre round like a .22, but a heavy round with high power, will not typically tumble around in the body like that. Obviously, anything is possible, but in this case, very improbable.

And what's your point?... that his wife had him killed or Trump or what?.... the motive is what?....

no idea, nobody has the answers, but, from what they are saying, the front entry doesnt make sense, when you look at all sides of the video. The shirt puffing up, no exit wound, what looks like an ear piece on the right side of his head becoming dislodged and whipping around the other side of his body, what appears to be muzzle flashes in another area, possible bullets being caught on video in more than one place. The entry wound being far too big to be an entry wound, no evidence of an exit wound. All of those things suggest he wasnt shot from the front, but rather from another angle, which then suggest that more than one shooter might have been involved, or 1 shooter and 1 patsy.

Again, these are all just speculative comments as nobody really knows the truth, but from the evidence they have rifht now, things dont appear to add up.
 
Maybe with a small calibre round like a .22, but a heavy round with high power, will not typically tumble around in the body like that. Obviously, anything is possible, but in this case, very improbable.



no idea, nobody has the answers, but, from what they are saying, the front entry doesnt make sense, when you look at all sides of the video. The shirt puffing up, no exit wound, what looks like an ear piece on the right side of his head becoming dislodged and whipping around the other side of his body, what appears to be muzzle flashes in another area, possible bullets being caught on video in more than one place. The entry wound being far too big to be an entry wound, no evidence of an exit wound. All of those things suggest he wasnt shot from the front, but rather from another angle, which then suggest that more than one shooter might have been involved, or 1 shooter and 1 patsy.

Again, these are all just speculative comments as nobody really knows the truth, but from the evidence they have rifht now, things dont appear to add up.II just think you don't have enough yet... But let me know when you do... I will keep an open mind...
I don't think you have enough yet... and keep in mind... The rate of velocity loss for a 30-06 round depends on several factors... including the specific bullet... muzzle velocity... load and atmospheric conditions... A bullet loses velocity due to air resistance or drag as it travels to the target... humidity... cross wind or head wind and temperature... all must be factored in...
However I'd be interested in your opinion of who shot Charlie and why if it wasn't the kid who confessed... and how many people were in on it... this isn't 1963 in Parkland Texas... we have cameras everywhere...
 
I don't think you have enough yet... and keep in mind... The rate of velocity loss for a 30-06 round depends on several factors... including the specific bullet... muzzle velocity... load and atmospheric conditions... A bullet loses velocity due to air resistance or drag as it travels to the target... humidity... cross wind or head wind and temperature... all must be factored in...
Sure, physics will always happen, but its not going to reduce it that much. Even after 200 yards (the supposed shooter in this case was at about 140 yards), the bullet is still going to be around 2000 to 2300 fps.

Again, im just looking at analysis here. You can watch the same videos I do and see where im coming from. According to them, and i agree, the front shot to the neck using a 30-06 doesnt seem right.

However I'd be interested in your opinion of who shot Charlie and why if it wasn't the kid who confessed... and how many people were in on it... this isn't 1963 in Parkland Texas... we have cameras everywhere...

I have no idea. The official story may be true, but from the hours of analysis ive watched, it seems unlikely. The powers that be could clear it all up if they release the high res video from the 3 cameras that were surrounding kirk.
 
The more I see information come out about this shooting, the more im thinking that Robinson isnt the guy. Several analysis videos ive watched are making me rethink.

First, the wound on his neck is much too large. It appears to be about the size of a half dollar, the entry wound for a .30-06 would only be about just a little larger than 1/4 of an inch. Meaning the neck wound we see would have to be the exit wound, which is plausible because, in about a 6 inch to 8 inch diameter (the thickness of the neck) wouldn't be enough tissue to deform the bullet much. If it did deform much at all, the exit wound would have been MUCH larger and more violent.

However, it couldn't have been a .30-06 because if it were, it would have passed through his neck, out his back, through the tent behind him and probably through anyone who was standing behind that. As it is, we dont see any exit wounds from the back, if there were, there would have been a spray of blood out the back, which we didnt see.

Im no ballistics expert, im just going off of what I've seen in the numerous analysis videos ive seen, but something caught my attention today. I was watching one video that said that it might be hard for them to convict Robinson of murder because the whole thing doesnt add up. It appears there was a wider conspiracy, with the old man at first, and then robinson who may have been cover for the real shooter to get away. Also several people in a discord chat room and even more in a steam chat room

Its obvious that robinson was involved, but there may be some doubt about him being the shooter.

Thoughts?
It was orchestrated by MAGA. Ask Jimmy Kimmel.
 
The more I see information come out about this shooting, the more im thinking that Robinson isnt the guy. Several analysis videos ive watched are making me rethink.

First, the wound on his neck is much too large. It appears to be about the size of a half dollar, the entry wound for a .30-06 would only be about just a little larger than 1/4 of an inch. Meaning the neck wound we see would have to be the exit wound, which is plausible because, in about a 6 inch to 8 inch diameter (the thickness of the neck) wouldn't be enough tissue to deform the bullet much. If it did deform much at all, the exit wound would have been MUCH larger and more violent.

However, it couldn't have been a .30-06 because if it were, it would have passed through his neck, out his back, through the tent behind him and probably through anyone who was standing behind that. As it is, we dont see any exit wounds from the back, if there were, there would have been a spray of blood out the back, which we didnt see.

Im no ballistics expert, im just going off of what I've seen in the numerous analysis videos ive seen, but something caught my attention today. I was watching one video that said that it might be hard for them to convict Robinson of murder because the whole thing doesnt add up. It appears there was a wider conspiracy, with the old man at first, and then robinson who may have been cover for the real shooter to get away. Also several people in a discord chat room and even more in a steam chat room

Its obvious that robinson was involved, but there may be some doubt about him being the shooter.

Thoughts?
None Robinson is the killer your ideas are flawed and have no support.
 
None Robinson is the killer your ideas are flawed and have no support.

Im not looking for support, im just relaying the information ive seen. I dont care if you dont agree, or expect anyone to agree with it, just presenting the informarion ive found. The point being, if these people are right, then the actual person who killed charlie is still out there.

At the very least, if you are interested, you could watch one or two of the videos I linked and tell me why their reasoning is flawed
 
Sure, physics will always happen, but its not going to reduce it that much. Even after 200 yards (the supposed shooter in this case was at about 140 yards), the bullet is still going to be around 2000 to 2300 fps.

Again, im just looking at analysis here. You can watch the same videos I do and see where im coming from. According to them, and i agree, the front shot to the neck using a 30-06 doesnt seem right.



I have no idea. The official story may be true, but from the hours of analysis ive watched, it seems unlikely. The powers that be could clear it all up if they release the high res video from the 3 cameras that were surrounding kirk.
We got the only shooter dude... you will see soon enough...
 
Back
Top Bottom