BREAKING: Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match rifle allegedly used by suspect, new court filing says

That claim is not supported by the facts though.

"Inconclusive" is not the same as "does not match."

It's not the same as ''does match'' either.

So what are the facts?

A .30-06 would have left the guy with nothing but a nub.

That's a fact.

Do you disagree? If so, then why?

Anyway. It's late. And past my bed time. I'll maybe check back tomorrow if I'm around.
 
Last edited:
It's the Daily Mail, about as trustworthy as the National Enquire

Conspiracy tards will believe literally anything but the truth. It lets them feel smart and wise instead of intellectually lazy and insane like they really are,
 
So the "Man of Steel" story is falling apart where Charlie's pencil human neck stopped a .30-06 round that would blow through and elk and probably the elk behind it, if that round was, as the government says, a .30-06. Charlie's head would have exploded and left quite a bit more of a mess than what we saw. I always wondered who at the Israeli Mossad assassinations department lost his job or his head over approving such a laughable story to a nation full of hunters, who you could hear from one end of the country to the other laughing their asses off.

The problem is the government has painted itself into a corner big time this time. You tweak your story regarding distances or such, but how do you backpedal on something as the caliber of the round you supposedly found stuck in Charlie? And if Robinson didn't do it, who did? And why did the FBI wed itself to such an obviously harebrained story. Who is Trump protecting? Why did Netanyahu get on TV the very next day and say 'I didn't do it?'










:cuckoo:
 
 
So the "Man of Steel" story is falling apart where Charlie's pencil human neck stopped a .30-06 round that would blow through and elk and probably the elk behind it, if that round was, as the government says, a .30-06. Charlie's head would have exploded and left quite a bit more of a mess than what we saw. I always wondered who at the Israeli Mossad assassinations department lost his job or his head over approving such a laughable story to a nation full of hunters, who you could hear from one end of the country to the other laughing their asses off.

The problem is the government has painted itself into a corner big time this time. You tweak your story regarding distances or such, but how do you backpedal on something as the caliber of the round you supposedly found stuck in Charlie? And if Robinson didn't do it, who did? And why did the FBI wed itself to such an obviously harebrained story. Who is Trump protecting? Why did Netanyahu get on TV the very next day and say 'I didn't do it?'









Are you capable of comprehending the difference between the words " DID NOT " and " MAY NOT "?

The article you quoted says MAY not you twisted and pefverted that into DOES NOT

Thhis is a masdive differenceand distinction which constitutyes and idiotic LIE on your part.

The bullet is irrelevant the case does not rest on it making this a nothing burger
 
It's not the same as ''does match'' either.

So what are the facts?

A .30-06 would have left the guy with nothing but a nub.

That's a fact.

Do you disagree? If so, then why?

Anyway. It's late. And past my bed time. I'll maybe check back tomorrow if I'm around.

I agree on most cases.

But we don't know if this was a clean shot with a normal "typical" 30-.06 round. I gave one possible explanation that has not yet been ruled out.

I believe Robinson may have shot through the parapet flashing.

Others have provided other possibilities like a fragmenting round, ricochet, etc.
 

BREAKING: Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match rifle allegedly used by suspect, new court filing says Filing by the defense... notice this bullshit artist munkle didn't tell you that part...​


Further to the point, not only is the defense merely claiming this, if Tyler Robinson did not shoot Charlie then who did? There is not even a single remote secondary suspect. If Robinson is wrong, then they got nothing, no idea, no trace, no lead.

That means that the same people whom the gov could track down 1600 people at a riot four years later cannot find the murderer who shot someone on camera right in the middle of a packed university?

Not to mention that Tyler's boyfriend has already testified that Tyler called him after the shooting and confessed the crime.
 
then who did?


Those who were furious at Charlie for


1. noticing the official version of 107 was 100% pure BS
2. leaving the "pro Israel cause" 2 days before


PM Netanyahu Meets with CIA Director John Ratcliffe





 
I looked and there are no reports of anyone hearing two shots... we know that punks rifle had fired so how did the real shooter know when to shoot?... how did he know when Robinson was going to pull the trigger?... come on guys use your heads...
 
Not Surprised the boards Nazi says the Jews did it....


Not surprising that another self proclaimed sub human uses the term "the Jews" because to notice differences between Jews is way too much cognitive computation for the self proclaimed sub human to handle...


 
15th post
So the argument is there was another shooter, maybe from Israel?

Ok...
buffy-the-vampire-slayer-btvs.gif



The number of people involved with offing Charlie was very large. The entire Spencer Cox Administration was behind it. Utah Valley State top brass was behind it. That local sheriff was behind it, he was one of the big liars on TV days after...




The local FBI branch and the CIA were Mossad enablers...
 
From what gathered about all this is that there simply wasn't enough of the bullet to match the rifling. When this type of bullet hits bone, it shatters. They're designed that way.

The defense knows this, and are using it to stall the prosecution.
 

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom