BREAKING: Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match rifle allegedly used by suspect, new court filing says

[Hollie]

And Tyler texting his tranny lover he did it means nothing lol

Or, Tyler confessing to his father.

 

[Augustine_]

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Or, Tyler confessing to his father.

Using gramp's gun


He's cooked

 

[HikerGuy83]

BREAKING: Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match rifle allegedly used by suspect, new court filing says​

Filing by the defense... notice this bullshit artist munkle didn't tell you that part...
Often times a round can not be 100% identified to a certain firearm for numerous reasons...

If you read munkle on the USA/Iran theads, you'll see what a propagandist she is.

 

[Hollie]

Not surprisingly, you are left to pointless cutting and pasting.

Tyler Robinson’s tranny boyfriend is down one Male squeeze. Step up to the plate. You can be the catcher.

 

[Augustine_]

Tyler Robinson’s tranny boyfriend is down one Male squeeze

So is... oh I won't go there

 

[Hollie]

So is... oh I won't go there

You go nowhere. You’re too stupid.

 

[OKTexas]

THREAD CLOSED, LINK DOES NOT SUPPOR CLAIMS OF FACT IN THE OP

 

[Natural Citizen]

If the bullet doesn't match the rifle, it came from another rifle.
It isn't rocket surgery.

^^ Pretty much this ^^

 

[Chuz Life]

^^ Pretty much this ^^

"inconclusive" is not the same as "does not match"

 

[candycorn]

"inconclusive" is not the same as "does not match"

I don't know why the board allows threads like this to continue. If you say _____________ in the title, the source should say ______________..... exactly. That detail you pointed out makes all the difference. They should leave the thread closed and sanction the OP for posting yet another false story.

 

[Natural Citizen]

"inconclusive" is not the same as "does not match"

And inconclusive isn't conclusive.

I think it's another JFK type of deal where nobody's ever gonna be permitted to know the whole truth.

I think Robinson is another useful idiot in the whole thing, but, as was mentioned, he's pretty much toast as a result of some kind of participation.

 

[Gary Seven]

No 30-.06 round would have lodged in Charlie Kirk.
Somebody killed him, and they took away a shining example of what men should be from humanity.
I couldn't be like him, I'm way too cynical and ornery.
But it's nice to have an Ideal. Shitheads took that away.
He was a good man. An example of what a good man is.
It is what it is. Jesus was a good man, too. As were all his disciples that died for their beliefs in him. As were the Coptic Christians ISIS beheaded for not denying God.
They will have a special place in heaven.
I have a feeling someone involved with American universities is who had Charlie Kirk assassinated. Specifically someone involved in promoting communist agendas in American universities is responsible.

Really much more likely the Mossad, IMO. Charlie revoked some of his support for Israel that he had previously held. I'm not a Christian nor particularly religious, but I really respected Charlie as a dispenser of truth...something the Mossad was afraid of because they have misrepresented what is really happening in the Middle East to the world.

 

[IDIOCRACY]

So the "Man of Steel" story is falling apart where Charlie's pencil human neck stopped a .30-06 round that would blow through and elk and probably the elk behind it, if that round was, as the government says, a .30-06. Charlie's head would have exploded and left quite a bit more of a mess than what we saw. I always wondered who at the Israeli Mossad assassinations department lost his job or his head over approving such a laughable story to a nation full of hunters, who you could hear from one end of the country to the other laughing their asses off.

The problem is the government has painted itself into a corner big time this time. You tweak your story regarding distances or such, but how do you backpedal on something as the caliber of the round you supposedly found stuck in Charlie? And if Robinson didn't do it, who did? And why did the FBI wed itself to such an obviously harebrained story. Who is Trump protecting? Why did Netanyahu get on TV the very next day and say 'I didn't do it?'

Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match Tyler Robinson's rifle

The bullet used to kill conservative commentator Charlie Kirk may not match the rifle suspected killer Tyler Robinson allegedly used in the assassination, his attorneys argue.

www.dailymail.co.uk

OT...I made the mistake of watching the original video..maybe it was just shock, probably error, but I could have sworn it hit the rh side of his neck, reports r it was his left.

Regardless I've never been more disgusted by the politics of which left fk fukr fks have built, and a big fu democrats, u r cracked

 

[Natural Citizen]

Really much more likely the Mossad, IMO. Charlie revoked some of his support for Israel that he had previously held. I'm not a Christian nor particularly religious, but I really respected Charlie as a dispenser of truth...something the Mossad was afraid of because they have misrepresented what is really happening in the Middle East to the world.

Nah. Couldn't have been them. That country was the very first to come out publicy the very next day saying they didn't do it.

 

[Chuz Life]

And inconclusive isn't conclusive.

I think it's another JFK type of deal where nobody's ever gonna be permitted to know the whole truth.

I think Robinson is another useful idiot in the whole thing, but, as was mentioned, he's pretty much toast as a result of some kind of participation.

There are many others doing time for convictions that were achieved with much less circumstantial evidence than this one.

I already presented my own theory and I would like to see all of the forensic evidence.

I also want to see closeups of the parapet. (not going to hold my breath.)

I wonder if they even bothered to test the parapet for GSR to see if Robinson's rifle was fired from there.

In the end, I'm just as along for the ride as everyone else is but I think the evidence shows well enough that the furry punk did it as he claimed he did.

 

[Natural Citizen]

There are many others doing time for convictions that were achieved with much less circumstantial evidence than this one.

I already presented my own theory and I would like to see all of the forensic evidence.

I also want to see closeups of the parapet. (not going to hold my breath.)

I wonder if they even bothered to test the parapet for GSR to see if Robinson's rifle was fired from there.

In the end, I'm just as along for the ride as everyone else is but I think the evidence shows well enough that the furry punk did it as he claimed he did.

Yeah, he's definitely toast. No doubt about that. He doesnlt stand a chance.

I just think there's a whole lot more to the story than is being reported in the mainstream.

 

[Chuz Life]

Yeah, he's definitely toast. No doubt about that. He doesnlt stand a chance.

I just think there's a whole lot more to the story than is being reported in the mainstream.

Like what?

I mean, other than speculation and conspiracy?

 

[Natural Citizen]

Like what?

I mean, other than speculation and conspiracy?

Someone much smarter planned that event out, in my view. As I said, I think he was just a useful idiot in the whole thing. It may very well be that he thought he fired the shot that killed him, but the evidence is, as you said, ''inconclusive.''

He was cetainly a participant in some way. His actual role may very well not even have been known to himself. The bullet did not match the gun he had, though.

Now, yes, one can and certainly will call it conjecture or conspiracy, but at the end of the day it's just asking more questions for answers that nobody is getting.

And those are seemingly very uncomfortable questions being shut down in every instance they're asked, unfortunately. That in itself is questionable.

To borrow relevant a quote from Sagan, "If we are not able to ask skeptical questions, to interrogate those who tell us that something is true, to be skeptical of those in authority, then, we are up for grabs for the next charlatan who comes rambling along.”

And that, too, is a fact.

 

[Chuz Life]

He was cetainly a participant in some way. His actual role may very well not even have been known to himself. The bullet did not match the gun he had, though.

That claim is not supported by the facts though.

"Inconclusive" is not the same as "does not match."