Kim Davis to join the GOP...

[Debra K]

What bothers me most about this whole deal, is both sides are trying to crack a walnut with sledge hammers.

and ANYONE, or EITHER side given to thought to trying to work out a compromise that would make both sides happy?

Perhaps giving one of her assistants authority to sign the license that Mrs Davis is uncomfortable signing?

Would that be so hard?

Or is total capitulation and surrender required?

Where have you been? The compromise you suggested was given to Ms. Davis and she rejected it ... she would not allow her deputy clerks to issue marriage licenses. That's why the judge sent her to jail. While she was sitting on her ass in jail, her deputy clerk issued marriage licenses. The judge released her from jail on the condition that she refrain from interfering, directly or indirectly, with her deputy clerks.

 

[Auld Phart]

Yet you are a far left that is intolerant to anything not part of the far left religion..

The far left drones like yourself make bible thumpers look like they are the most open minded people on the planet..

Your statement only makes sense to an idiot.

We don't have to tolerate intolerance, including bigots using religion to be bigoted.

You disagree with the 1st Amendment?

You're free to be as big of an idiot as you like...no?

Think the day will ever come that I'll be as big an idiot as you?

Judging by your postings on this thread, you are in no position to call anyone an idiot.

Judging by your postings on this thread, you are in no position to call anyone an idiot

pot, meet kettle

 

[Auld Phart]

Your statement only makes sense to an idiot.

We don't have to tolerate intolerance, including bigots using religion to be bigoted.

You disagree with the 1st Amendment?

You're free to be as big of an idiot as you like...no?

Think the day will ever come that I'll be as big an idiot as you?

Judging by your postings on this thread, you are in no position to call anyone an idiot.

Judging by your postings on this thread, you are in no position to call anyone an idiot

pot, meet kettle

BTW, that is the first post I've been able to get into this thread for over 30 minutes.

 

[Auld Phart]

What bothers me most about this whole deal, is both sides are trying to crack a walnut with sledge hammers.

and ANYONE, or EITHER side given to thought to trying to work out a compromise that would make both sides happy?

Perhaps giving one of her assistants authority to sign the license that Mrs Davis is uncomfortable signing?

Would that be so hard?

Or is total capitulation and surrender required?

Where have you been? The compromise you suggested was given to Ms. Davis and she rejected it ... she would not allow her deputy clerks to issue marriage licenses. That's why the judge sent her to jail. While she was sitting on her ass in jail, her deputy clerk issued marriage licenses. The judge released her from jail on the condition that she refrain from interfering, directly or indirectly, with her deputy clerks.

Then you don't ask her, you TELL her that one of her assistants will be authorized to sign the licenses she has a problem with.

If she can't handle that, she can quit.

 

[Carla_Danger]

What bothers me most about this whole deal, is both sides are trying to crack a walnut with sledge hammers.

and ANYONE, or EITHER side given to thought to trying to work out a compromise that would make both sides happy?

Perhaps giving one of her assistants authority to sign the license that Mrs Davis is uncomfortable signing?

Would that be so hard?

Or is total capitulation and surrender required?

Where have you been? The compromise you suggested was given to Ms. Davis and she rejected it ... she would not allow her deputy clerks to issue marriage licenses. That's why the judge sent her to jail. While she was sitting on her ass in jail, her deputy clerk issued marriage licenses. The judge released her from jail on the condition that she refrain from interfering, directly or indirectly, with her deputy clerks.

I believe WeeWillie gets his news from this forum. That's the only explanation I can think of.

 

[Auld Phart]

What bothers me most about this whole deal, is both sides are trying to crack a walnut with sledge hammers.

and ANYONE, or EITHER side given to thought to trying to work out a compromise that would make both sides happy?

Perhaps giving one of her assistants authority to sign the license that Mrs Davis is uncomfortable signing?

Would that be so hard?

Or is total capitulation and surrender required?

Where have you been? The compromise you suggested was given to Ms. Davis and she rejected it ... she would not allow her deputy clerks to issue marriage licenses. That's why the judge sent her to jail. While she was sitting on her ass in jail, her deputy clerk issued marriage licenses. The judge released her from jail on the condition that she refrain from interfering, directly or indirectly, with her deputy clerks.

I believe WeeWillie gets his news from this forum. That's the only explanation I can think of.

CNN

I do my best to stay away from the more biased cable news.

Also read Reuters, AP, UPI, articles, and stay away from Saloon, Puffiington, and other biased sources as much as possible.

Truthout?

Ran out of truth years ago.

 

[bodecea]

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/26/u...riage-dispute-kim-davis-joining-gop.html?_r=0

I guess the dummies calling her a Democrat can rest their typing fingers now. She is finally switching parties BECAUSE of her stance on gay marriage.

Hope you on the left are proud of yourselves.

You're chasing Democrats away from your party......and liberals know this is happening.....and they're doing everything they can to bring new, poor, immigrants into this country to fill their base.

Just further proof that Democrats can't expand their ranks through their policies unless they break the law.

Davis and the GOP will be very happy together. Why would you deny them that, Birther?

 

[Carla_Danger]

What bothers me most about this whole deal, is both sides are trying to crack a walnut with sledge hammers.

and ANYONE, or EITHER side given to thought to trying to work out a compromise that would make both sides happy?

Perhaps giving one of her assistants authority to sign the license that Mrs Davis is uncomfortable signing?

Would that be so hard?

Or is total capitulation and surrender required?

Where have you been? The compromise you suggested was given to Ms. Davis and she rejected it ... she would not allow her deputy clerks to issue marriage licenses. That's why the judge sent her to jail. While she was sitting on her ass in jail, her deputy clerk issued marriage licenses. The judge released her from jail on the condition that she refrain from interfering, directly or indirectly, with her deputy clerks.

I believe WeeWillie gets his news from this forum. That's the only explanation I can think of.

CNN

I do my best to stay away from the more biased cable news.

Also read Reuters, AP, UPI, articles, and stay away from Saloon, Puffiington, and other biased sources as much as possible.

Truthout?

Ran out of truth years ago.

And here you are, uninformed about the story you are posting about. How does that happen?

 

[nat4900]

Your comment sounds like you are saying that her elected position has a requisite of "lack of tolerance toward existing laws" - which is entirely false. Her elected position requires her to follow the law. So, yes, the Republican party is "less tolerant" and "less law-abiding". They certainly do not tolerate abortion which is legal, and same-sex marriage which is also legal. The fact that Davis is refusing to do her job shows she is less law-abiding and certainly not tolerant. Are Republicans not the ones cheering her on?

So what is your question exactly?

Alas, my sarcasm was completely lost if the above is all you discerned from my post.

 

[nat4900]

When Obama decides to follow all of our laws instead of just the ones he likes....you'll have room to talk......but not until then.

Well, then, how are those impeachment charges progressing regarding Obama's breach of laws???
I mean, the HOUSE has a whole bunch of tea sippers just sitting around bitching......Come on, you wanted to switch topics from Davis to Obama....own up on those impeachment strategies.

 

[nat4900]

At the same moment you say this...you're showing a lack of tolerance.

Go figure....


But this fake belief that Republicans are less law-abiding in this case.....especially since this woman is a Democrat, is totally unfounded. I suspect you're projecting her supposed sins unto the GOP, and that is dishonest.

It is NOT "intolerance" to expect someone to fulfill his or her duties in an elected position.

Davis is 100% entitled to her [albeit bigoted] stances....BUT NOT WHEN EXERCISING HER POSITION'S DUTIES.

If you right wingers could squeeze a bit more out of those remaining brain cells....you too would understand the difference.

 

[Flopper]

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/26/u...riage-dispute-kim-davis-joining-gop.html?_r=0

I guess the dummies calling her a Democrat can rest their typing fingers now. She is finally switching parties BECAUSE of her stance on gay marriage.

She is finally where she belongs, among the religious and conservative fanatics.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

This is a micro example of the evolution of the Democratic Party through the civil rights movement. Quite literally, like the racists of 40-60 years ago, because of her bigotry she found a new home.

Exactly.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

At the same moment you say this...you're showing a lack of tolerance.

Go figure....


But this fake belief that Republicans are less law-abiding in this case.....especially since this woman is a Democrat, is totally unfounded. I suspect you're projecting her supposed sins unto the GOP, and that is dishonest.

It is NOT "intolerance" to expect someone to fulfill his or her duties in an elected position.

Davis is 100% entitled to her [albeit bigoted] stances....BUT NOT WHEN EXERCISING HER POSITION'S DUTIES.

If you right wingers could squeeze a bit more out of those remaining brain cells....you too would understand the difference.

Correct.

This nonsense concerning Davis has nothing to do with 'intolerance' or 'religious liberty'; it has to do with an elected official following the rule of law as required by the Article VI of the Constitution, where Davis is at liberty to believe as she wishes as a private citizen, and not at liberty to act in an official capacity on those beliefs.

As a republican Davis will be among those who likewise have contempt for the Constitution, its case law, and the rule of law.

 

[Vandalshandle]

What is really amusing is that she thinks that the award that the RW bigot association gave her has something to do with her!

 

[bodecea]

What bothers me most about this whole deal, is both sides are trying to crack a walnut with sledge hammers.

and ANYONE, or EITHER side given to thought to trying to work out a compromise that would make both sides happy?

Perhaps giving one of her assistants authority to sign the license that Mrs Davis is uncomfortable signing?

Would that be so hard?

Or is total capitulation and surrender required?

Where have you been? The compromise you suggested was given to Ms. Davis and she rejected it ... she would not allow her deputy clerks to issue marriage licenses. That's why the judge sent her to jail. While she was sitting on her ass in jail, her deputy clerk issued marriage licenses. The judge released her from jail on the condition that she refrain from interfering, directly or indirectly, with her deputy clerks.

Then you don't ask her, you TELL her that one of her assistants will be authorized to sign the licenses she has a problem with.

If she can't handle that, she can quit.

That's what the judge did....TELL her...and she still refused. That's contempt.

 

[JQPublic1]

Heh heh heh NOW now,.... you are being a bit harsh on yourself, aren't you?

No... Nothing harsh about me, imbecile.

You lack basic reading comprehension. He didn't call you harsh, he called you an idiot, idiot.

ROFLMNAO!

You can NOT make this crap up! "Idiot" Indeed...

You are just too stupid to notice that I turned your own words against you... You must have been talking about yourself when you used the word idiot in the context of post #167.

Has anyone else mentioned to you that your working IQ is somewhere around 90? And I don't say that as a pejorative. I state it as a demonstrated fact. And I base that on the several non sequiturs that you just advanced, as fact.

Listen buddy... I think its great when the Intellectually Less Fortunate reach out beyond their comfort zone. But you can't behave in the way you did above and not expect people to respond in kind. And you're not equipped to handle the sort of responses that you're likely to get.

So... why don't you run on over to the "FIRE HOT! - WATER WET!" thread. A person with your special gifts could really do well over there!

Now with that said, I want you to know that this has been great, really! But I need more... and you simply do not have what it takes to qualify what is flopping around in your noggin' to be considered... by me.

So I'm going to send you to Ignore. It's a great place, with a LOT of people, just like you. You're gonna love it!

SO thanks for the memory I'll cherish it for ..er.

You don't even know what a non sequitur is. Define anything I have said in this thread that even resembles a non sequitur. Go on, I am waiting... this ought to be good!

 

[Auld Phart]

What bothers me most about this whole deal, is both sides are trying to crack a walnut with sledge hammers.

and ANYONE, or EITHER side given to thought to trying to work out a compromise that would make both sides happy?

Perhaps giving one of her assistants authority to sign the license that Mrs Davis is uncomfortable signing?

Would that be so hard?

Or is total capitulation and surrender required?

Where have you been? The compromise you suggested was given to Ms. Davis and she rejected it ... she would not allow her deputy clerks to issue marriage licenses. That's why the judge sent her to jail. While she was sitting on her ass in jail, her deputy clerk issued marriage licenses. The judge released her from jail on the condition that she refrain from interfering, directly or indirectly, with her deputy clerks.

Then you don't ask her, you TELL her that one of her assistants will be authorized to sign the licenses she has a problem with.

If she can't handle that, she can quit.

That's what the judge did....TELL her...and she still refused. That's contempt.

"One of Davis' attorneys said Bunning hasn't resolved anything.

"We've asked for a simple solution -- get her name and authority off the certificate. The judge could order that," Staver said."

 

[Vandalshandle]

What bothers me most about this whole deal, is both sides are trying to crack a walnut with sledge hammers.

and ANYONE, or EITHER side given to thought to trying to work out a compromise that would make both sides happy?

Perhaps giving one of her assistants authority to sign the license that Mrs Davis is uncomfortable signing?

Would that be so hard?

Or is total capitulation and surrender required?

Where have you been? The compromise you suggested was given to Ms. Davis and she rejected it ... she would not allow her deputy clerks to issue marriage licenses. That's why the judge sent her to jail. While she was sitting on her ass in jail, her deputy clerk issued marriage licenses. The judge released her from jail on the condition that she refrain from interfering, directly or indirectly, with her deputy clerks.

Then you don't ask her, you TELL her that one of her assistants will be authorized to sign the licenses she has a problem with.

If she can't handle that, she can quit.

That's what the judge did....TELL her...and she still refused. That's contempt.

"One of Davis' attorneys said Bunning hasn't resolved anything.

"We've asked for a simple solution -- get her name and authority off the certificate. The judge could order that," Staver said."

He is a judge in a federal court. He has no authority to tell the state or county what to do unless the state or county is in violation of a federal law.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Her " rightful place " is in PRISON for Hate Crimes.

Well that is false, federal hate crime legislation has to do with murder, arson, kidnapping, and assault - not opposing same-sex civil marriage.

When bakers refused to make a wedding cake for gays the Justice Department filed hate crime charges.

That is false also. Complaints were filed under State public accommodation laws, the Justice Department had (a) no part of the civil lawsuits that resulted, and (b) didn't file any charges.

>>>>