Kidnapped Israeli Teenagers - A Palestinian View

Phoenall, et al,

Don't let him get to you.

Our friend is trying to play games with the word "gas." He probably doesn't understand that the dozen or so riot control agents, including CN and CS, are non-lethal crystalline chemical sprays; and not really a "gas" at all.

They are usually released in the form of a liquid spray (aerosol), or as a particulate either in smoke or as a vapor. It can be released in near colorless mist, but is more commonly seen in the white crystalline solid form. Sometimes, depending on the humidity, it can initially appear as blue-white cloud at point of release. Slang name for CS and CN is "Tear gas" --- but is actually powder riding some similar medium; not a gas.

It is not illegal to use as a riot control agent.

Most Respectfully,
R
Don't let me get to him? Listen dude, I don't play games.

What do you call the tear gas that looks like "smoke"?

Is it legal to shoot a canister at an international journalist while they are trying to give a report on TV?




Are you actually trying to defend this shit?


One more thing, it is not legal to shoot tear gas at peaceful protestors.





try again the pallywood journo was provoking a riot and was close to where the crowd control weapon landed. It was not targeted because you cant target an irregular shaped object.


Just another example of your JEW HATRED clouding your humanity
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No you stated categorically that the Israeli's were using gas to kill Palestinians like the Nazis did to the Jews.
Then provide the post where you claim I said that.


When asked to provide evidence you posted a video of non lethal tear gas being used for riot control and stated categorically that it showed Israelis gassing Palestinians. So your whole point was a BARE FACED LIE that Israel was using gas to kill Palestinians.
I believe he commented that the Israeli's never gassed anyone. So I provided a video of the Israeli's gassing someone with a can of tear gas. You're the ones who keep making the Nazi comparisons, not me.


Just one of a long list of your comparisons that are just figments of your JEW HATRED FANTSY WORLD.
Why would I hate jews?
 
try again the pallywood journo was provoking a riot and was close to where the crowd control weapon landed. It was not targeted because you cant target an irregular shaped object.


Just another example of your JEW HATRED clouding your humanity
Anyone who sees that video will know you're a ******* idiot!
 
You want a Palestinian view? How about the 2500 Palestinian children Israel kidnapped in 2014?

Israel seized an estimated 2,500 Palestinian children and youth between January 2010 and June 2014 – with approximately 400 just 12-15 years old.
Where's the outrage over the Israeli kidnappings?

To date, Israeli authorities have raided more than 1,500 Palestinian homes and businesses and arrested more than 550 Palestinians, in a search for the kidnappers and an attempt to wipe out the Hamas political party, which it has labeled as responsible without citing evidence. Six Palestinians have died as a result – including a 14-year-old boy who was shot in the chest at point-blank range and a 78-year-old woman who suffered a heart attack during a house raid.
"...without citing evidence..."

That figures.
 
Not only is it a powder, but it's heat-activated. When the husband came home from an 'NBC' session - I made sure I washed his BDU's in cold water, and did NOT put them in the dryer just in case anything remained. Usually, I just washed 'em twice......
So you're saying it's okay to shoot them at anyone you feel like?




Well you seem to advocate doing just this to Jewish men, women and children when you get elected as President. Will you round up all the Jews in the US and put them in death camps when you are elected. Then steal all their possessions for your own use, then skin them to make lampshades . Will you grow a Charlie Chaplin moustache and have a comb over hair style, wear brown military fatigues and strut around like a rooster.


If the crowd is in danger of getting out of control and wont disperse than it is a legitimate weapon to use. It is non lethal to very nearly everyone so cant be claimed to have killed a healthy person. So yes it is okay to shoot them at anyone IF THE SITUATION DEMANDS IT
 
How do we know those people were 'journalists'? I saw nothing to identify them as such - no station logo, nothing like that.
Because that is the title of the video.


And how do we know WHY the soldiers were telling them to leave the area? Do we have the soldiers on the video explaining what's going on?
What evidence do you have indicating they are not journalists?



So if that video was re-released and was titled Palestinians firing gas at unarmed Jews would that not also be true


What evidence do you have that proves they were, NONE just the word of an ISLAMONAZI LIAR.
 
Reuther's, for one, doesn't employ any journalists, and most of the other 'international reporters' aren't real reporters, just PR hacks for various biased groups, like the Guardian or assorted propaganda rags. Real journalism pretty much died out in the 1990's, with 'Journalism' schools just churning out 'activists' or news readers. The only relatively unbiased news sources are the local ones, like Haaretz, the JP, and Arutz Sheva.




The Palestinians refuse to allow non Palestinians to gather their own reports, instead they allocate pallywood productions journos to make the films for them. Any journalist that argues is threatened with violence and can be deported with a the threat of their wire service losing the license to operate from Palestine. The best know case was the Al-Dura boy that the pallywood productions staff claimed had been killed by an Israeli sniper. ( sounds familiar, time they changed the story ) When the full uncut video was viewed it showed the boy moving and asking if his acting was good enough minutes after the original film had ended.
 
very simple look at the original LoN plan for the M.E. and you see the extent of the land allocated for the JEWISH NATIONAL HOME. That land was stolen by the Hashemites to create Jordan, who then stole Jewish land in the west bank and annexed it as part of Jordan.
The West Bank is not Israel's.

That is the position of every ******* country on the planet.



No one said the west bank was Israel's, but many parts of it are Jewish owned and the Palestinians stole those when they evicted the owners by force.


That is the position of every decent human being on the planet, and the ICJ
 
Map of Israel in the Time of Jesus Christ with Roads (Bible History Online)
Map-Palestine-New-Testament-Times.gif
What happened 2000 years ago, don't mean shit today.

It carry's no legal weight.




Nor does your JEW HATRED that you show every day you post. What does carry legal weight is the judgement of the ICJ who have stated the blockade is legal, the occupation is legal and Israel is not an apartheid state
 
... Just recently in a raid on a mosque in the UK foreign passports were found hidden in the roof space. along with weapons and terror training manuals. The government did nothing because the muslims might not vote for them in the next election

You consider 2003, recent? The police found exactly 1 count it, 1 imitation firearm, along with taser which is commercially available in the UK and a CS gas canister. No "terrorist training manuals" but a number of passports and credit cards were found. of the men arrested 6 were North African and 1 was from Eastern Europe. They were questioned and later released. By the time American media got hold of the story you'd think we'd destroyed a major al-Qaeda operation and just missed capturing Bin-Laden. :lol:
 
try again the pallywood journo was provoking a riot and was close to where the crowd control weapon landed. It was not targeted because you cant target an irregular shaped object.


Just another example of your JEW HATRED clouding your humanity
Anyone who sees that video will know you're a ******* idiot!



They will also know that you are a LYING POS NAZI JEW HATER.

Now were in the video are the IDF, as the canister could have come from anywhere or anyone.
 
You want a Palestinian view? How about the 2500 Palestinian children Israel kidnapped in 2014?

Israel seized an estimated 2,500 Palestinian children and youth between January 2010 and June 2014 – with approximately 400 just 12-15 years old.
Where's the outrage over the Israeli kidnappings?

To date, Israeli authorities have raided more than 1,500 Palestinian homes and businesses and arrested more than 550 Palestinians, in a search for the kidnappers and an attempt to wipe out the Hamas political party, which it has labeled as responsible without citing evidence. Six Palestinians have died as a result – including a 14-year-old boy who was shot in the chest at point-blank range and a 78-year-old woman who suffered a heart attack during a house raid.
"...without citing evidence..."

That figures.




Kidnapped or arrested for breaking the law ?


How can the IDF be blamed for a heart attack, does this mean I can blame the Palestinians if I have a heart attack ?

14 is a man according to the palestinians
 
... What does carry legal weight is the judgement of the ICJ who have stated the blockade is legal, the occupation is legal and Israel is not an apartheid state

That's interesting, care to provide me with a link to the judgements and when they were made; I'd like to look at the rulings. Thanks in advance.
 
... Just recently in a raid on a mosque in the UK foreign passports were found hidden in the roof space. along with weapons and terror training manuals. The government did nothing because the muslims might not vote for them in the next election

You consider 2003, recent? The police found exactly 1 count it, 1 imitation firearm, along with taser which is commercially available in the UK and a CS gas canister. No "terrorist training manuals" but a number of passports and credit cards were found. of the men arrested 6 were North African and 1 was from Eastern Europe. They were questioned and later released. By the time American media got hold of the story you'd think we'd destroyed a major al-Qaeda operation and just missed capturing Bin-Laden. :lol:

Yes I do and the outcome was that the muslims were allowed to carry on using the mosque. All of the above are illegal to possess in the UK so the mosque should have been closed down and then destroyed.

Weapons discovered during London mosque raid | World news | theguardian.com

Police this evening said that they had recovered a stun gun, a blank-firing imitation firearm and a CS gas canister during a search of the North London Central Mosque in Finsbury Park.
The mosque was raided at 2am this morning in an operation linked to the discovery of traces of the poison ricin in a north London flat.

Police also discovered large numbers of passports, identity cards and credit cards. Seven people were arrested following the "pre-planned and intelligence-led" raid, which involved the mosque and two three-storey properties nearby.

Egyptian-born Abu Hamza, a radical cleric based at the mosque who was not one of those arrested, denied any link between the mosque and the discovery of ricin earlier this month in a flat in Wood Green.



The same abu hamza who is now in jail for terrorist offences.
 
15th post
... 14 is a man according to the palestinians

One year older than Judaism then; a Jewish person becomes a man at 13 doesn't he? Yet in Israeli law the age of majority is 18, so why are so many minors in held in adult prisons in Israel?
 
That's interesting, care to provide me with a link to the judgements and when they were made; I'd like to look at the rulings. Thanks in advance.
He can't do that. He's an internet troll who just say's shit. He can't prove shit, so he just say's it. I've said before, he's either a psychopathic liar, or 15 years old.

He's tried to provide a link 3 times, to my knowledge. One was a generic webpage that said nothing about his claim; the other wasn't even an ICJ website, it was the ICRC and a generic page as well; and the 3rd said the opposite of what he was claiming.
 
Indeed. They are a violent criminal gang, and they were first elected by 'Palestinians' in Gaza, in what most of the 'international observers' claimed at the time was a 'free and fair' election, so these BS claims of 'collective punishment being unfair' are utter nonsense, and always have been.

Not true. They were the elected majority in the Palestinian Authority. That was in the West Bank and Gaza.




They did not have an outright majority and needed support from other parties to get that majority. So they were toothless in the P.A. and could do nothing.

Look at the results of the election for the evidence of this, to be an elected majority means you have to hold 51% OF THE SEATS.

Hamas did win an absolute majority of seats. 76 out of 132.

In Wednesday's voting, Hamas claimed 76 of the 132 parliamentary seats, giving the party at war with Israel the right to form the next cabinet under the Palestinian Authority's president, Mahmoud Abbas, the leader of Fatah.

Fatah, which has dominated the legislature since the previous elections a decade ago and the Palestinian cause for far longer, won 43 seats. A collection of nationalist, leftist and independent parties claimed the rest.

Hamas Sweeps Palestinian Elections, Complicating Peace Efforts in Mideast

Victory Ends 40 Years of Political Domination by Arafat's Party

The preliminary results, announced tonight by the Central Election Committee, were likened by Palestinians to an earthquake or a tsunami, ending more than 40 years of political domination by Fatah, the main political faction built by the late Yasir Arafat. Fatah, along with the Palestinian Authority, is widely viewed by Palestinians as corrupt and ineffective.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/26/international/middleeast/26cnd-hamas.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
 
Not true. They were the elected majority in the Palestinian Authority. That was in the West Bank and Gaza.




They did not have an outright majority and needed support from other parties to get that majority. So they were toothless in the P.A. and could do nothing.

Look at the results of the election for the evidence of this, to be an elected majority means you have to hold 51% OF THE SEATS.

Hamas did win an absolute majority of seats. 76 out of 132.

In Wednesday's voting, Hamas claimed 76 of the 132 parliamentary seats, giving the party at war with Israel the right to form the next cabinet under the Palestinian Authority's president, Mahmoud Abbas, the leader of Fatah.

Fatah, which has dominated the legislature since the previous elections a decade ago and the Palestinian cause for far longer, won 43 seats. A collection of nationalist, leftist and independent parties claimed the rest.

Hamas Sweeps Palestinian Elections, Complicating Peace Efforts in Mideast

Victory Ends 40 Years of Political Domination by Arafat's Party

The preliminary results, announced tonight by the Central Election Committee, were likened by Palestinians to an earthquake or a tsunami, ending more than 40 years of political domination by Fatah, the main political faction built by the late Yasir Arafat. Fatah, along with the Palestinian Authority, is widely viewed by Palestinians as corrupt and ineffective.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/26/international/middleeast/26cnd-hamas.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

The Nazi party also won legal elections in Germany.
 
Back
Top Bottom