Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Whether Judge Jackson “gets” it or not, I am quite confident that she is about to be confirmed as the next Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States of America. My hope is that she grows in the position and disappoints the leftwing here in America.
Much more than mere complaints.The Declaration of independence is a series of complaints that seek to justify breaking away from the colonizers. Nothing more.
Actually, there is some doubt about that. Although I believe it is law (for a few reasons), I understand that there is some question:Yes, the Declaration of Independence is law.
Although the Declaration of Independence stands with the Constitution as a founding document of the United States of America, its position in U.S. law is much less certain than that of the Constitution. The Declaration has been recognized as the founding act of law establishing the United States as a sovereign and independent nation, and Congress has placed it at the beginning of the U.S. Code, under the heading "The Organic Laws of the United States of America." The Supreme Court, however, has generally not considered it a part of the organic law of the country. For example, although the Declaration mentions a right to rebellion, this right, particularly with regard to violent rebellion, has not been recognized by the Supreme Court and other branches of the federal government. The most notable failure to uphold this right occurred when the Union put down the rebellion by the Southern Confederacy in the Civil War.
Yes. Here's another.Actually, there is some doubt about that. Although I believe it is law (for a few reasons), I understand that there is some question:
— Declaration of Independence
It is a very interesting article.
I dunno. When Kennedy nominated Justice Whizzer White, it was assumed he would be a solid “liberal” vote.Never happens, leftoid nominees always stick to their leftoid script. And this woman is the most radical person ever nominated.
Justice Roberts sure has disappointed many Americans. Still scratching our heads on voting for same-sex marriage.I dunno. When Kennedy nominated Justice Whizzer White, it was assumed he would be a solid “liberal” vote.
He disappointed Kennedy.
Certainly some Jurists nominated by more conservative Presidents have disappointed those on the right, too, with certain decisions.
Some people end up taking the position very seriously. Some people do rise to the occasion.
To be legally enforceable they need to be tied to our laws or ConstitutionNot quite correct. Rights are rights. Constitutionally referenced rights are the ones that are guaranteed by the Constitution. They aren’t rights just because the Constitution references them. They are rights which pre-existed the Constitution.
History will thank himJustice Roberts sure has disappointed many Americans. Still scratching our heads on voting for same-sex marriage.
The Founding Fathers did not apply natural rights to all people in the US.
And his ObamaCare decision.Justice Roberts sure has disappointed many Americans. Still scratching our heads on voting for same-sex marriage.
This is now, derp.
16. Do you hold a position on whether individuals possess natural rights, yes or no?RESPONSE: I do not hold a position on whether individuals possess natural rights.
I dunno. When Kennedy nominated Justice Whizzer White, it was assumed he would be a solid “liberal” vote.
He disappointed Kennedy.
Certainly some Jurists nominated by more conservative Presidents have disappointed those on the right, too, with certain decisions.
Some people end up taking the position very seriously. Some people do rise to the occasion.
Queers will, not Americans who respect the Constitution. Marriage laws are a states issue, but hey, doesn't matter to people who view the Constitution as something that can be twisted and bent to fit the society's fads.History will thank him
Where does the Constitution mention abortion and marriage?To be legally enforceable they need to be tied to our laws or Constitution
The constitution is the wellspring of US law. It has it's basis in other documents but none of them can be considered law.Much more than mere complaints.
Natural Law and the Declaration of Independence
To those who wrote and signed the Declaration of Independence, political liberty and natural law went together: Nature summons man, individually and collectively, to self-government and guides him in the exercise of his power of choice.www.thepublicdiscourse.com
I’m not quibbling with you. I’m just stating that the Constitution (for the most part) doesn’t provide rights. It only guarantees the rights. (And there may be some exceptions to that.)To be legally enforceable they need to be tied to our laws or Constitution