Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 61,142
- 25,628
- 2,173
It wouldn’t. The name change is almost certainly irrelevant to the contract.He could argue that the name change was illegal. That would be relevant.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It wouldn’t. The name change is almost certainly irrelevant to the contract.He could argue that the name change was illegal. That would be relevant.
The Kennedy Center name change has no contractual connotation. Try harder. This hissy fit is going to cost this 'artist'.Actually, this is on obvious case of frivolous lawsuit. They have to prove people would’ve paid $1 million extra solely for this guy to play a jazz song.
Secondly, the artist signed up to play for a company by a different name: The Kennedy center. They changed their name, so contract void.
What are you implying? That no contract exists or that you are incapable of understanding basic contract law?You didnt read the opening post did you?
Stfu. They can sue for breach of contract.![]()
Kennedy Center threatens to sue musician who canceled concert after Trump's name added to building
Richard Grenell, the venue's president, called Chuck Redd's decision to cancel a Christmas Eve concert a “political stunt” and said he would sue for $1 million in damages.www.nbcnews.com
Ordinarily I would say that they had an arguable case. As with most trump grifts he is just looking for a payout.
However the trump gimp making the case seems to be out of touch with reality.
You cant get compo for poor ticket sales. Tickets sell or dont at the whim of the public. Thats just the risk you take.
In fact the artist could argue that the name itself is off putting and people of culture re unllikely to want an association with a racist cult.
The Klan Pavillion is unlikely to pack em in.
Bad move. No semi decent performer will sign a future gig with them.Stfu. They can sue for breach of contract.
The measure of damages isn’t wizardry.
I wonder if the professional contract included a “liquidated damages” clause in it?
He could argue that the name change was illegal. That would be relevant.
Yeah. “I have been known to breach perfectly clear contracts” isn’t a good ad campaign.Bad move. No semi decent performer will sign a future gig with them.
Every performer signs contracts for every venue they perform at. Whether that’s a play house, arena or stadium. You don’t get to walk out of those contracts without paying a huge penalty.Bad move. No semi decent performer will sign a future gig with them.
Every performer signs contracts for every venue they perform at. Whether that’s a play house, arena or stadium. You don’t get to walk out of those contracts without paying a huge penalty.
You have to be ungodly stupid to be a lefty.Hard to believe every lefty retard in this thread doesn't know that, isn't it?
Bookmarked.The Kennedy Center name change has no contractual connotation. Try harder. This hissy fit is going to cost this 'artist'.
The very smart Missouri_Mike just met his reputation on his prediction that the Kennedy Center will get some money off the musician. I’ll check on you periodically for a progress report.You have to be ungodly stupid to be a lefty.
Marvin finally gets the source he was looking for! A right wing nickname in a message board by the name of “Missouri Something” just assertted that his years in message board law school have taught him that this musician will pay money in this case.Hard to believe every lefty retard in this thread doesn't know that, isn't it?
Fair point.![]()
Kennedy Center threatens to sue musician who canceled concert after Trump's name added to building
Richard Grenell, the venue's president, called Chuck Redd's decision to cancel a Christmas Eve concert a “political stunt” and said he would sue for $1 million in damages.www.nbcnews.com
Ordinarily I would say that they had an arguable case. As with most trump grifts he is just looking for a payout.
However the trump gimp making the case seems to be out of touch with reality.
You cant get compo for poor ticket sales. Tickets sell or dont at the whim of the public. Thats just the risk you take.
In fact the artist could argue that the name itself is off putting and people of culture re unllikely to want an association with a racist cult.
The Klan Pavillion is unlikely to pack em in.
Did you look up the valid situations in which an individual can walk out of a contract?Stfu. They can sue for breach of contract.
The measure of damages isn’t wizardry.
I wonder if the professional contract included a “liquidated damages” clause in it?
You’re a joke who asks silly questions. Try to smarten up. Reddit was clear about why he decided to breach the contract.Did you look up the valid situations in which an individual can walk out of a contract?
Don’t tell me you looked it up because it’sa rhetorical question.
You don’t look things up.
BackAgain, looks like you’re predicting Redd will end up paying the Kennedy Center more than zero pennies, or that a judge will order him to do so. Can you confirm?You’re a joke who asks silly questions. Try to smarten up. Reddit was clear about why he decided to breach the contract.
And “I don’t like the name of the recently renamed Kennedy Center” isn’t a valid reason
Obviously, you’re completely ignorant about legal matters, as well as a legion of other things.

And another thing that buffoons are not telling you is that the admission was free. Tickets were zero dollars each.Fair point.
I'd argue, "Performing at The Kennedy Center has a certain modicum of honor attached to it. Performing at anything named Trump has a lot of dishonor attached to it; much like playing Sun City during apartheid did; likely more infamy in fact. I had to think about my career."