- Thread starter
- #441
Article II also says someone who isn't qualified cannot hold office. No election commission is going to waste their time including someone in an election that can't hold the office. You're being foolish.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Article II also says someone who isn't qualified cannot hold office. No election commission is going to waste their time including someone in an election that can't hold the office. You're being foolish.
The Amendment does not restrict itself to Confederates but to former office holders who violated their oaths to commit or support insurrection. Sorry, but multiple courts have now concluded that Trump is accurately described by the Amendment.LOL .. You're anchoring to an amendment that was targeting participants of the Confederacy from running for office. Who has declared Trump is a Confederate like soldier? Where is the legal, objective outcome of this? Or is it just feelings?
Several members of the judiciary, significantly better qualified than you to make such a judgement, disagree.The confederacy was an insurrection. Jan 6th was a protest.
Some states may have parallel wording in their own constitutions but the 14th Amendment does not apply to state offices.Most if not all states have their officers swear to uphold both the constitution of the US and the constitution of their state.
I don't know who you were watching, but I didn't see anyone attacking Congress.It was a little early for ChatGPT. Who was it we were watching and listening to?
Their definition is very limited.They mean no one is disenfranchised because you can vote for anyone they allow on the ballot.
BLM did not attack the US Capitol, the police defending the facility or threaten the lives of elected representatives and the vice president. Feel free to stick your head up your ass and jump, you ignorant ratfuck.No different than BLM protesters. **** you, liar.
They haven't been heard from yet.Several members of the judiciary, significantly better qualified than you to make such a judgement, disagree.
Perhaps. But she did NOT overstep her authority.She called wrong. She'll be set straight soon.
You should write that on your pacifier before you go to bed tonight./——/ Not a fantasy. You clowns are scared shytless.
No, but you're blitheringly ignorant.Of course you would think that. You're a fascist.
Oh? Perhaps their actual target was the Capitol Police and they really wanted to have it out with them in the chambers of the House and the Senate. You haven't gotten any smarter here Paddy.I don't know who you were watching, but I didn't see anyone attacking Congress.
No, EvilCatBreath has pegged it.Their definition is very limited.![]()
Wrong again.No, EvilCatBreath has pegged it.
I can support that.I heard Trump has a plan to direct asteroids at Dem cities.
Not Constitutionally.Of course I can.
A higher court will educate you soon.Several members of the judiciary, significantly better qualified than you to make such a judgement, disagree.
The Supreme Court will soon agree with me. That makes you the ignorant one.No, but you're blitheringly ignorant.
The judge of the 2nd Colorado District Court and the judges of the Colorado Supreme Court have all concluded that Trump is guilty of insurrection. In total, nine different federal judges in 15 cases have concluded that Trump is guilty of insurrectionThey haven't been heard from yet.
Lincoln declared it an insurrection, but technically it wasn’t. It was an attempt by the confederacy to leave the Union. Not overthrow it.The confederacy was an insurrection. Jan 6th was a protest.