C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
Correct.But no one would be any more disenfranchised by that restriction than they are by the others.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Correct.But no one would be any more disenfranchised by that restriction than they are by the others.
There are differences regarding federal elections.As I said, states run elections. And they determine a candidate isn't eligible to appear on their ballots, that person doesn't appear on their ballots.
Why didn't they charge Him then and sentence Him to death?The Colorado case was tried in a District Court and the State Supreme Court and BOTH concluded that Trump had committed insurrection.
If you can't legally stop someone from running for president its a "de facto" right, even if not "enumerated" in the Constitution.
We have the right to eat and breathe and go potty even though they are not enumerated..
What? By "14/3" I am referring to Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution under whose restrictions the Supreme Court of Colorado and the Main Secretary of State have both concluded that Trump is ineligible to run for president in their state's elections. Is that not a problem for him?I see.
Although, I am more confused now. Mainly because I could not find where you presented proofs here that Mr. Trump has a problem with 14/3 nor Article II Sect 1, whatsoever.
Trump has made numerous comments about the issue in the media and in press briefs and his legal team has filed briefs with the Colorado 2nd District and Supreme Courts, the Maine Supreme Court and the US Supreme Court.From what I have seen, Mr. Trump has mentioned no concerns, functionally nor legally, with the qualifications of candidacy.
OkayWhen I turn on CNN, I keep being told that Mr. Trump is upset over being called an insurrectionist --he said especially since that unfair label keeps him from running for Presidency. I have never heard of him being upset only by how 14/3 forbids him from running as the proud insurrectionist that he is claiming to be.
No it is not. It's not even close.If he feels the label is unfair including it keeps him from being eligible to run for an office he feels he deserves to run for, then... that is an exact definition of disenfranchising any voters who want to vote for him.
LMAO have you been to the VA hospital?However, socialized healthcare is in the best interests of the 'General welfare' of the country.

She did not overstep her authority. The Maine State Constitution explicitly gives her the power to determine candidate eligibility.The Maine Secretary of State overstepped her authority. Her opinion isn't law.
Not regarding federal elections.The Maine State Constitution explicitly gives her the power to determine candidate eligibility.
LMAO have you been to the VA hospital?![]()
The insurrection is bogus. President Trump was leading a protest. A sitting President doesn't overthrow his own country.Were you thinking that a disagreement about an election WOULDN'T be political? And what persecution of whom are you talking about and how is the government being used to do it?
Yeah like Canada, no wait they come here for quality healthcare. Well those who didn't die first waiting in Canada for an appointment for government shitcare.No, but I know plenty of people that live in countries that have socialized healthcare. Everyone of them is very happy with that system. There is no country in the world whose people have wanted to desocialize healthcare.
Most people think that the American healthcare system is barbaric.
Nope. The USSC will educate you soon.Jan. 6 was an insurrectionist riot with the intent of overthrowing the Democratic transition of power - overthrowing that process is effectively overthrowing the democratically elected government.
But you knew that, so please stop trying to play dumb.
I heard Trump has a plan to direct asteroids at Dem cities.The insurrection is bogus. President Trump was leading a protest. A sitting President doesn't overthrow his own country.
She'll be put in her place soon.She did not overstep her authority. The Maine State Constitution explicitly gives her the power to determine candidate eligibility.
Not regarding federal elections.
The U.S. Constitution explicitly states that the States control Federal elections.
Explicitly?She did not overstep her authority. The Maine State Constitution explicitly gives her the power to determine candidate eligibility.
Yeah like Canada, no wait they come here for quality healthcare. Well those who didn't die first waiting in Canada for an appointment for government shitcare.
Of course I can.You can't make a case that the Jan 6th protest was an insurrection.
Article I, Section 4, Clause 1:
The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.