Keeping ICE away from polling places a top priority for Democrats

Democrats are no fans of ICE being anywhere but keeping ICE away from polling places is a top priority - to the point they are willing to keep DHS shut down if this demand is not met.

If you think about it, Democrats insist and are certain illegals don’t vote in elections. If ICE is putting any effort to be near polling places during an election, that’s fewer resources to go after illegals elsewhere. Couple this with Democrats concern over illegals being left off voter registration polls and SAVES Act passage.

I'm with them on this and it has nothing to do with illegals. We just don't need the police state theatrics.
 
Two men.

Two new black panther men in front of 1 black community voting place allegedly to protect them.....and one had a bat or baton type thingy.....if memory serves....?

Verses 80,000 federal armed forces of Homeland Security with ICE and BP.

DO YOU EVER USE LOGIC? Deductive reasoning? The brain that God gave you?
LOL backatacha
Your masters have you believing that Trump is going to deploy 80,000 armed officers to polling stations across the country. LOL
 
LOL backatacha
Your masters have you believing that Trump is going to deploy 80,000 armed officers to polling stations across the country. LOL
.

One of them actually believes that ICE are arresting you for looking foreign.

Stupid or what?

.
 
I'm with them on this and it has nothing to do with illegals. We just don't need the police state theatrics.
People should feel safe about themselves and about the votes they are casting. We don’t need police state theatrics but we live in an era of Muslim suicide bombers and lone-wolf crazy white guy shooters.
 
15th post

Its illegal.
You were lied to.
This is what happens when you aren't curious enough to look into the rest of the story.

The federal law in question literally refers to "troops" and places the entire law into that context - members of the military, or those employed by same, ordered by their officers.
It does not cover federal law enforcement, which are not troops, even if armed, and are not ordered by said officers.


Thus:
You have no factual or rational basis for your claim.
 
You were lied to.
This is what happens when you aren't curious enough to look into the rest of the story.

The federal law in question literally refers to troops and places the entire law into that context - member of the military, or those employed by same, ordered by their officers.
It does not cover federal law enforcement, which are not troops, even if armed, and are not ordered by said officers.


Thus:
You have no factual or rational basis for your claim.
Armed men. Federal agents are armed.
 
Back
Top Bottom