Keeping ICE away from polling places a top priority for Democrats

[Marener]

Diversion from my question.



I asked you for specific instances.

Noted in the court case you morons won’t read.

 

[Marener]

Trolling, off topic





.

What you don’t know, can’t hurt you, so you hide.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

What you don’t know, can’t hurt you, so you hide.

.

Behind YOUR trolling?

Cute post.





.

 

[Marener]

.

Behind YOUR trolling?

Cute post.





.

I gave you a link to a court case where a judge found that ICE was unconstitutionally arresting people because they were minorities.

Your response was to deny it.

 

[Nostra]

You mean policies like putting armed federal thugs at polling places? Unconditional support for ICE policies, may very well lose them elections, if the Republican MAGA crowd remain unconditionally supportive if their illegal Un-American actions and activities.

What Un American actions? Not looking for the talking points you have been fed, I'm looking for examples backed up by facts.

 

[Nostra]

There is no proof or even reporting, it is happening. The Heritage foundation cannot even come up with anything significant. The Save Act is a solution, searching for a problem, that simply does not exist.

Did you just claim there is no proof of illegals voting?

 

[Nostra]

Local police, not really. Feds? Yes. The fed must comply with the Constitution and Federal law, or else they themselves are false Law Enforcement or are allowing themselves to be used by the party in power of Federal Government to influence elections. The Federal LE organizations and the officer's themselves should reject illegal orders.

Local police don't have to comply with the Constitution?

 

[Care4all]

jc456

POLICE.

You have a problem with police at the polling station? I don't.

Police are local, state, and ok,

Federal agents at polls is ILLEGAL...AGAINST THE LAW.

Federal law strictly prohibits the presence of armed federal agents or military personnel at polling places to prevent voter intimidation. While local law enforcement may be present, their role is typically limited to maintaining order at the request of election officials, and their presence is subject to specific state laws and restrictions to ensure they do not interfere with the voting process.

 

[Nostra]

ICE has done exactly that.

ICE in Minnesota: Judge finds federal agents likely engaged in ‘unconstitutional’ immigration enforcement | FOX 9 Minneapolis-St. Paul

While a federal judge found Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) “likely maintained unconstitutional policies" of race-based immigration enforcement and warrantless arrests, he denied a request to block federal agents from carrying out the continued practices in Minnesota.

www.fox9.com

And yet, your lefty Judge did nothing about it. Looks like he just spouted off a few Dimtard talking points and moved on because there was no case.

Nice post, Moroner.

 

[jc456]

jc456

Police are local, state, and ok,

Federal agents at polls is ILLEGAL...AGAINST THE LAW.

Federal law strictly prohibits the presence of armed federal agents or military personnel at polling places to prevent voter intimidation. While local law enforcement may be present, their role is typically limited to maintaining order at the request of election officials, and their presence is subject to specific state laws and restrictions to ensure they do not interfere with the voting process.

no link

 

[Stann]

Democrats are no fans of ICE being anywhere but keeping ICE away from polling places is a top priority - to the point they are willing to keep DHS shut down if this demand is not met.

If you think about it, Democrats insist and are certain illegals don’t vote in elections. If ICE is putting any effort to be near polling places during an election, that’s fewer resources to go after illegals elsewhere. Couple this with Democrats concern over illegals being left off voter registration polls and SAVES Act passage.

Blue states push to ban ICE at the polls amid federal voter intimidation fears • Stateline

Several Democratic states are moving to bar federal immigration agents from being near polling places and other election sites, amid persistent worries that President Donald Trump will use federal law enforcement or the military to disrupt the midterm elections. Measures to restrict federal...

stateline.org

ICE or any other law enforcement agency doesn't belong anywhere near polling places. We have free elections in America. When police accompanied polsters in the eastern provinces of the Ukraine. The Russians won the elections because a landslide even though they only represented a minority of the population. Fear has no place in a free nations elections.

 

[Nostra]

I gave you a link to a court case where a judge found that ICE was unconstitutionally arresting people because they were minorities.

Your response was to deny it.

A judge made no such ruling.

 

[Marener]

A judge made no such ruling.

Considering your functionally illiterate, this post doesn’t surprise me.

 

[Delldude]

Noted in the court case you morons won’t read.

Your court case addresses stop and arrest policies not your original claim as you said below:

Evidence provided in court showed otherwise. ICE agents and DHS lawyers have made a habit of telling unbelievable stories in court and have a serious credibility problem.

So how many court cases has this happened in?

Please show the cases.

 

[Marener]

Your court case addresses stop and arrest policies not your original claim as you said below:

So how many court cases has this happened in?

Please show the cases.

Your delusional cultist comrade was denying this, and still does.

One of them actually believes that ICE are arresting you for looking foreign.

Stupid or what?

Not so stupid when it’s demonstrated in court.

Stupid is refusing to read and understand because you don’t want to know the truth.

Or maybe cowardly.

 

[Nostra]

Considering your functionally illiterate, this post doesn’t surprise me.

Cite his ruling. The quote and link earlier was just his opinion thrown out there before doing nothing.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Your delusional cultist comrade was denying this, and still does.



Not so stupid when it’s demonstrated in court.

Stupid is refusing to read and understand because you don’t want to know the truth.

Or maybe cowardly.

.

You haven't demonstrated squat.

Keep crying.




.

 

[Delldude]

Stupid is refusing to read and understand because you don’t want to know the truth.

Your link is about arrest procedures without addressing any specific cases of agents saying unbelievable things as your post I responded to inferred.

"Let's be honest here"

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Considering your functionally illiterate,

.

"Considering your functionally illiterate..............................."

 

[Care4all]

no link

In the context of the federal law (18 U.S. Code § 592) mentioned earlier, the phrase "person in the civil, military, or naval service" refers to the two main branches of federal employment:

1. Civil Service (The "Civil" Part)​

This refers to the civilian workforce of the federal government. These are employees who work for federal agencies but are not active-duty military members.

• Examples: Agents from the FBI, DHS, ICE, or any other federal administrative department.
• The Rule: The law says these civilian federal officials cannot use their authority to bring "armed men" or troops to a polling place.

2. Military and Naval Service​

This refers to the Armed Forces (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Space Force, and Coast Guard).

• The Rule: Officers in these branches are strictly prohibited from stationing troops at polling stations.

Why the distinction matters​

The law is written this way to cover everyone who works for the federal government, whether they wear a military uniform or a suit. It ensures that:

• The President (as Commander-in-Chief) cannot send the military.
• Federal Department Heads (like the Secretary of Homeland Security) cannot send armed federal agents.

Is "Civil Military" a single group?​

Usually, when people say "Civil-Military," they are talking about Civil-Military Relations—the principle that the military must always stay under the control of elected civilian leaders (like the President and Congress) rather than running the country themselves.


In the specific law you asked about, "civil" and "military" are listed separately to make sure no federal employee, regardless of their department, interferes with an election.


Local police are not part of the "federal civil service," which is why they are governed by state laws instead of these specific federal restrictions.


https://www.cornell.edu/search/

1. LII
2. U.S. Code
3. Title 18
4. PART I
5. CHAPTER 29
6. § 592

Quick search by citation:
Title
Section

18 U.S. Code § 592 - Troops at polls​

• U.S. Code
• Notes

prev | next
Whoever, being an officer of the Army or Navy, or other person in the civil, military, or naval service of the United States, orders, brings, keeps, or has under his authority or control any troops or armed men at any place where a general or special election is held, unless such force be necessary to repel armed enemies of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both; and be disqualified from holding any office of honor, profit, or trust under the United States.

This section shall not prevent any officer or member of the armed forces of the United States from exercising the right of suffrage in any election district to which he may belong, if otherwise qualified according to the laws of the State in which he offers to vote.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 719; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)