Keeping ICE away from polling places a top priority for Democrats

[Nostra]

2012

Never happens……Ooooooops!

 

[White 6]

Never happens……Ooooooops!

Rarely happens, hence not much of a problem. Personally, I think states should require it, but it is the call of the states, not a matter for Federal interference, and not worth the time, except as a talking point.

 

[Nostra]

Rarely happens, hence not much of a problem. Personally, I think states should require it, but it is the call of the states, not a matter for Federal interference, and not worth the time, except as a talking point.

Man up for once in your pathetic life and stop dodging this question:

How many Americans being disenfranchised by illegal votes are you OK with? Give us a number, Troll.

 

[teddyearp]

.

One of them actually believes that ICE are arresting you for looking foreign.

Stupid or what?

.

And that one of which you speak is a mod, who refuses to back that claim up after multiple requests from more than one person. In this thread.

 

[teddyearp]

You were lied to.
This is what happens when you aren't curious enough to look into the rest of the story.

The federal law in question literally refers to "troops" and places the entire law into that context - members of the military, or those employed by same, ordered by their officers.
It does not cover federal law enforcement, which are not troops, even if armed, and are not ordered by said officers.

18 U.S. Code § 592 - Troops at polls

www.law.cornell.edu

Thus:
You have no factual or rational basis for your claim.

From 18 U.S.C. § 592 that you referred: " . . or other person in the civil, . . ." Whereas civil refers to anyone who works in the Executive branch, including ICE officers; they are civil employees.

So, though I agree with you, I must point out where you are not quit correct good sir. Just to keep us all form looking like dumb liberals, hehe.