Did the democrats steal the house?
They sure as hell tried. There are many races that the dems magically took by a margin just outside of automatic recount range.
Funny how that happened so many times.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Did the democrats steal the house?
Voting shenanigans by Democrats would explain why the red wave was smaller than expected.Did the democrats steal the house?
Voting shenanigans by Democrats would explain why the red wave was smaller than expected.
The economy is judged by our gdp, as one major part....what we produce and sell. The stock market/wall street, is not how any economy is judged.Lowest Black unemployment in history.
What does GDP have to do with everybody?
Under GW, 99.9% of the US was underemployed but Wall Street was enjoying record GDP.
Seriously...get an education before you post rolled up garbage.
Our first laws were from the Bible because we were founded by Christians.Wrong.
America was founded as a secular nation with a government free from religious doctrine and dogma.
GDP ALWAYS means ZERO to the average person.The economy is judged by our gdp, as one major part....what we produce and sell. The stock market/wall street, is not how any economy is judged.
Yes, black unemployment was improved under Trump, from what I have read, but then destroyed again, with covid.
Voting shenanigans by Democrats would explain why the red wave was smaller than expected.
Elections aren’t being stolen. You’re being brainwashed. Simple as that. Grow upA few more stolen elections and we will truly be a banana republic.
They sure as hell tried. There are many races that the dems magically took by a margin just outside of automatic recount range.
Funny how that happened so many times.
So.... you're telling me they specifically rigged it so they would only win by a narrow margin? Wouldn't that defeat the whole purpose of rigging an election in the first place? Isn't the object to win? You got some great logic going there. Keep it up. You don't look like a fool at all. The democrats rigged it elections so well they lost the house. Totally makes sense.
You just described yourself perfectly, shit for brains.No, you post the same ignorant crap ad nauseum.
Your posts don't warrant a reasoned response because YOU aren't reasonable.
Yeah. It's amazing what technology allows you to do.
I know you won't even begin to think about it honestly, you're not capable, but thinking people see margins constantly just outside that range and they can calculate odds.
Year after year there is ZERO chance that it can happen.
on an appearance on Huckabee, Kari says that she had the biggest crowd during the campaign while her opponent barely made it out of her basement, so it's impossible that Kari fell at Katie's feet in the election. she says she's gonna challenge it all the way to the Supreme Court. she got a standing ovation for saying we should secure the border, and Huck got a standing ovation for saying Kari was the most articulate candidate in the midtermsIf there's still any doubts, I think we can conclude that Kari Lake has officially "jumped the shark." It's really unfortunate. If she simply accepted her loss like any mature, non-sociopathic adult would have done, she'd still have a political future and quite possibly be a strong candidate for Senate in 2024, but she can kiss any further runs for office goodbye. She's certifiably nuts.
Failed Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake is now claiming that America will "turn into a Venezuela" unless she is installed as governor.
The election has already been certified and her Democratic rival, Katie Hobbs, has been sworn in as governor.
Lake made the comments on the radio with right-wing student activist Charlie Kirk, during a segment in which she touted her legal efforts to challenge the results of the Arizona election. She later shared a clip of the segment on Twitter, with a link to give her money for that challenge.
MSN
www.msn.com
Really? Where does it say that in the cotus? Our government gives money to all kinds of organizations that many people don't agree with. Why should those organizations get money from the government, but not one with a religious nature? As long as government doesn't deny one but accept another, all things being equal.The only limitation towards promoting or encouraging religion is that taxpayer funds cant be used to do that.
Well, she's half right. America IS turning into Venezuela, thanks to the Democrats. But, even if she were governor, I doubt that would change anything.If there's still any doubts, I think we can conclude that Kari Lake has officially "jumped the shark." It's really unfortunate. If she simply accepted her loss like any mature, non-sociopathic adult would have done, she'd still have a political future and quite possibly be a strong candidate for Senate in 2024, but she can kiss any further runs for office goodbye. She's certifiably nuts.
Failed Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake is now claiming that America will "turn into a Venezuela" unless she is installed as governor.
The election has already been certified and her Democratic rival, Katie Hobbs, has been sworn in as governor.
Lake made the comments on the radio with right-wing student activist Charlie Kirk, during a segment in which she touted her legal efforts to challenge the results of the Arizona election. She later shared a clip of the segment on Twitter, with a link to give her money for that challenge.
MSN
www.msn.com
Obviously, you've never been to VenezuelaWell, she's half right. America IS turning into Venezuela, thanks to the Democrats.
What stolen election are you referring to?A few more stolen elections and we will truly be a banana republic.
I never said we were there. I said Democrats have us heading in that direction. But, I'm glad to hear you don't want to be like Venezuela.Obviously, you've never been to Venezuela
Obviously, you've never been to Venezuela
my taxpayer dollars should pay for the flying spaghetti monster?Really? Where does it say that in the cotus? Our government gives money to all kinds of organizations that many people don't agree with. Why should those organizations get money from the government, but not one with a religious nature? As long as government doesn't deny one but accept another, all things being equal.
The whole notion of the establishment clause has been grossly misinterpreted. In the government eyes, why should an organization with a religious charter be viewed any different than any other organization? There are many organizations that enjoy government funding, and tax exempt status, many of which some people like, some people don't.
All thr establishment clause means is the government can't say "Christianity, Islam, bhuddism, etc..is our national religion"