Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Actually, from my best info, the south had a right to secede. It was the states that created the federal gummit, not the other way around. What the states can ratify, they can vote to de-ratify. I mean, again, the fed govt was a creation of the several statesThose Confederates actively participated in a years long war trying to break apart the Union. The 14th was passed specifically to address them. They were declared guilty of insurrection by a Congressional act and a Presidential decree.
Apples and oranges to Trump’s case, Simp.
It's still going to be the biggest direct contradiction to your Constitution and no matter the interpretation it's going to require a rewrite..Living societies do that they question the basis of their law.
The Dem regime does end runs around the SCOTUS all the time.
I honestly have more confidence in them that they will step up and do the right thing here.It would ne nice but I think they want to stay as far away as they can from this can'o worms.
No, it is not a contradiction since the amendment was made for people who do the wrong things to obtain power.It's still going to be the biggest direct contradiction to your Constitution and no matter the interpretation it's going to require a rewrite..
I think that's the entire motive behind bringing it up.
And still, it's upholding the Constitution or Trump.
You must be able to agree that there's something that doesn't allow Trump's side to just sweep it under the carpet.
It's a can of worms opened that the Dems see as being a big deal issue.
I can see a lot of reason for a 5-4 split in the affirmative, with a lot of scrambling by the court on which ones can be dissenters. Roberts will likey demand to be one.I hope SCOTUS makes very short work of this one and sets that rogue court back on its heels.
The Dem regime does end runs around the SCOTUS all the time.Breaking news is that CO just folded like a cheap lawn chair and is including Trump on the ballot.I honestly have more confidence in them that they will step up and do the right thing here.
They knew SCOTUS would overrule them.Do you think a SCOTUS ruling will stop this Dem insurrection?
Breaking news is that CO just folded like a cheap lawn chair and is including Trump on the ballot.
Not true.Do you think a SCOTUS ruling will stop this Dem insurrection?
Breaking news is that CO just folded like a cheap lawn chair and is including Trump on the ballot.
and THAT was passed? we are talking exclusion of robert e lee etc from being excluded from office? no. that was never done. was it even considered?Congress. On the ratification by the States
Actually, from my best info, the south had a right to secede. It was the states that created the federal gummit, not the other way around. What the states can ratify, they can vote to de-ratify. I mean, again, the fed govt was a creation of the several states
If the vote is anything other than 9/0 to strike down the Colorado court ruling, I will be deeply disappointed.I can see a lot of reason for a 5-4 split in the affirmative, with a lot of scrambling by the court on which ones can be dissenters. Roberts will likey demand to be one.
Yes. It's a party primary.So you are saying the CO SC is wrong.
Yeah he did. His rebellion against our Constitution failed. The Jan 6th trial should be expedited not delayed.Luckily, he didn't do that.
See above.
then why bother removing him from the ballot?
I know what's popular on this board, but thank you and others who are getting a headache over considering mine.If the vote is anything other than 9/0 to strike down the Colorado court ruling, I will be deeply disappointed.
maybe trump's minions are excluding him ftom the ballot in order to force an ill considered precedent from a runaway court.
The second point is interesting. The first is utterly imbecilic. How would Congress "enforce" it?The Supreme Court absolutely will rule in favor of President Trump.
The state GOP’s petition argues three points:
<><>the presidency is not covered by the 14th, the insurrection clause is not “self-executing”
<><>means Congress alone must enforce it; states cannot make that determination on their own —
<><>by kicking Trump off the ballot, the state Rep Party’s “rights of association” have been violated.
JUST IN: US Supreme Court Officially Asked to Overturn Colorado High Court Decision to Bar Trump From Ballot | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
The Republican Party of Colorado asked the US Supreme Court to overturn the state’s high court’s decision to bar Trump from the 2024 ballot.www.thegatewaypundit.com
That's the point my friend!Roberts has sided with the liberal justices many times.
