JUST IN: Supreme Court Sets Unusual Opinion Release For Monday Morning – Signals Ruling on Trump Ballot Eligibility Imminent

[bigrebnc1775]

Everyone with half a brain knew this ruling was coming, which leaves you out. You're not rioting because Trump got his way.

Suck this, Anus.

Dumbass it leaves most of you leftists out

 

[bigrebnc1775]

no idea how this is relevant.

It's not my fault you don't know what you wright

 

[pknopp]

It's not my fault you don't know what you wright

Orville or Wilbur?

(I never mentioned anything about fraud)

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Orville or Wilbur?

(I never mentioned anything about fraud)

Write
Who wrote this?
I never argued about the speed was the reason. I also believe it will be a 7-2 ruling at least.

You can't exclude someone for something they have never been convicted of doing. He most certainly could be convicted before the election though.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Trump never was convicted of fraud
If he was when was his criminal trial date?

Found liable, like Hitler liable for killing Jews: A judge ruled Tuesday that Donald Trump committed fraud for years while building the real estate empire that catapulted him to fame and the White House, and he ordered some of the former president's companies removed from his control and dissolved.

Judge orders Trump to pay $355 million for lying about his wealth in staggering civil fraud ruling​

Former Trump company CFO Weisselberg pleads guilty to perjury in fraud trial​

Schneiderman first sued Trump in 2013 for allegedly defrauding thousands of Trump University attendees out of millions of dollars. The $25 million settlement will recover about 90 percent of the costs of those who attended Trump University, which, as part of the settlement

Trump reaped over $100 million through fraud, New York says as trial starts

A defiant Donald Trump attacked New York's attorney general and the judge overseeing his civil fraud trial as it began on Monday, with a state lawyer accusing the former president of generating more than $100 million by lying about his real estate empire.

www.reuters.com

Trump has been a financial fraud for decades

Trump is nothing more than a classic con artist.

thehill.com

 

[Clipper]

Found liable, like Hitler liable for killing Jews: A judge ruled Tuesday that Donald Trump committed fraud for years while building the real estate empire that catapulted him to fame and the White House, and he ordered some of the former president's companies removed from his control and dissolved.

Judge orders Trump to pay $355 million for lying about his wealth in staggering civil fraud ruling​

Former Trump company CFO Weisselberg pleads guilty to perjury in fraud trial​

Schneiderman first sued Trump in 2013 for allegedly defrauding thousands of Trump University attendees out of millions of dollars. The $25 million settlement will recover about 90 percent of the costs of those who attended Trump University, which, as part of the settlement

Trump reaped over $100 million through fraud, New York says as trial starts

A defiant Donald Trump attacked New York's attorney general and the judge overseeing his civil fraud trial as it began on Monday, with a state lawyer accusing the former president of generating more than $100 million by lying about his real estate empire.

www.reuters.com

Trump has been a financial fraud for decades

Trump is nothing more than a classic con artist.

thehill.com

Now Trump's defense can't call Weaselburg in the Daniels trial to testify because Bragg will crucify him on the stand for being a convicted perjurer. Trump is also screwed in his appeal of the $355 million judgement because one of his star witnesses, Weaselburg is again, a convicted perjurer, headed back to Riker's.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

 

[Missouri_Mike]

It’s amazing how many democrats are desperate to save our democracy by only letting people run that they agree with. Well, here’s a 9-0 fuck off.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Now Trump's defense can't call Weaselburg in the Daniels trial to testify because Bragg will crucify him on the stand for being a convicted perjurer. Trump is also screwed in his appeal of the $355 million judgement because one of his star witnesses, Weaselburg is again, a convicted perjurer, headed back to Riker's.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

It has a chance of fucking up the case. But we'll see.

It's the Trump Family Crime Syndicate.

 

[BrokeLoser]

The unarmed peacufull protestors who didn't storm the capital

”STORM”…hahaha…cool word. Didn’t they just break and enter / trespass like all those wetbacks you cherish do?

e Trump's private militia marauding thru that building attacking police & hunting down Pence, members of Congress & disrupting Biden's certification which didn't occur until 3;30 a.m. on 1/7

“MARAUDING”….hahaha…cool word. Protests are designed to delay something from happening…hahaha

a result of the actions of Trump & his animals.

LefTard Logic:
“Animals”-

Not Animals:

Sane people also have eyes & we saw just what happened. Live & in living color.

Are those the same “sane“ people who believe a man can become a woman by proclamation?

Procrustes Stretched

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

”STORM”…hahaha…cool word. Didn’t they just break and enter / trespass like all those wetbacks you cherish do?

“MARAUDING”….hahaha…cool word. Protests are designed to delay something from happening…hahaha

LefTard Logic:
“Animals”-
View attachment 912488
Not Animals:
View attachment 912491



Are those the same “sane“ people who believe a man can become a woman by proclamation?

Procrustes Stretched

 

[Clipper]

”STORM”…hahaha…cool word. Didn’t they just break and enter / trespass like all those wetbacks you cherish do?

“MARAUDING”….hahaha…cool word. Protests are designed to delay something from happening…hahaha

LefTard Logic:
“Animals”-
View attachment 912488
Not Animals:
View attachment 912491
When all else fails bring up BLM. Did they try to overturn an election?


Are those the same “sane“ people who believe a man can become a woman by proclamation?

Procrustes Stretched

It’s amazing how many democrats are desperate to save our democracy by only letting people run that they agree with. Well, here’s a 9-0 fuck off.

Take a good look at the clown you want to reelect because you think he was sent by god & his sidekick:

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Take a good look at the clown you want to reelect because you think he was sent by god & his sidekick:

Gods sidekick? You mean son?

WWJD? Secure borders, good economy, no wars.

Damn, maybe Trump is the second coming.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

As we have said from the beginning, and as Republicans have threatened , a ruling allowing states to unilaterally remove candidate from the ballot could easily be abused.

Red states could remove Biden on bullshit charges and blues states could remove Trump.

That’s a can of worm the SCOTUS wanted no part of.

Let me fix this for you:

Red states could remove Biden on bullshit charges and blue states could remove Trump on bullshit charges.

There ya go!

 

[tahuyaman]

When was the last time a sitting president took the unprecedented step to keep his opponent's win from being certified?

btw, "The Colorado court forced this action?" The court was asked to decide something. They did. Their ruling forced this. But it's a state's right vs a federal thing. State's right issue.

"That’s what dictated the time table." You need to stop arguing with voices in your head. Because in the real world, I never argued about the timing .

Sheesh.


In an interview on a conservative radio program, Mr. Trump said he was pleased by the ruling.
“I was very honored by a nine-to-nothing vote,” he said. “And this is for future presidents, this is not for me.”

True. But the immunity decision will be about him personally, as well as for the future. He is the one who has claimed the shit

The Democrats tried to stop the certification of electors after the 2016 election.

 

[tahuyaman]

And they wonder why minorities and women are not rushing to the GOP.

Blacks are going to the Republican side in significant numbers.

 

[BS Filter]

Now Trump's defense can't call Weaselburg in the Daniels trial to testify because Bragg will crucify him on the stand for being a convicted perjurer. Trump is also screwed in his appeal of the $355 million judgement because one of his star witnesses, Weaselburg is again, a convicted perjurer, headed back to Riker's.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

How's that insurrection thingy going?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

The Democrats tried to stop the certification of electors after the 2016 election.

No, they did not do what Trump and his cohorts did. Trump and his cohorts broke laws. Democrats did not break any laws in 2016.

try and be honest

Fact check:

Post Misleadingly Equates 2016 Democratic Effort to Trump’s 2020 ‘Alternate Electors’​

Basic Differences in 2016 and 2020 Efforts​

First, the Democrats were not calling for “alternate electors” in 2016 but “faithless electors” who were duly chosen to represent their states in the Electoral College. Most of those who did switch their votes broke their own states’ laws by not voting for the candidate to whom they were pledged.


Those seeking to submit slates of alternative electors in 2020 wanted to remove duly chosen electors by fiat and reverse the outcome in battleground states won by Biden and certified by state election officials. No one has been charged in that effort yet, but Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco told CNN that federal prosecutors were looking into the fraudulent elector certifications.

...

While the 2016 effort was aimed at influencing duly chosen electors, the 2020 push sought to create lists of electors who would vote for Trump in battleground states that he lost and where the Republicans falsely claimed there had been widespread election irregularities.

read it and go crawl back under your rock...

Post Misleadingly Equates 2016 Democratic Effort to Trump's 2020 'Alternate Electors' - FactCheck.org

After the 2016 presidential election, some progressive Democrats tried to convince electors for Donald Trump to switch their Electoral College votes to Hillary Clinton. But a conservative commentator misleadingly claimed in a social media post that the Democrats were "calling for alternate...

www.factcheck.org

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Blacks are going to the Republican side in significant numbers.

Yep, a 200% increase from 3 to to 6 to 9 to maybe ...

 

[tahuyaman]

Yep, a 200% increase from 3 to to 6 to 9 to maybe ...

Democrats are scared to death about losing possibly 20% of the black vote. That would be a trend which would grow

 

[tahuyaman]

No, they did not do what Trump and his cohorts did. Trump and his cohorts broke laws. Democrats did not break any laws in 2016.

try and be honest

Fact check:

Post Misleadingly Equates 2016 Democratic Effort to Trump’s 2020 ‘Alternate Electors’​

Basic Differences in 2016 and 2020 Efforts​

First, the Democrats were not calling for “alternate electors” in 2016 but “faithless electors” who were duly chosen to represent their states in the Electoral College. Most of those who did switch their votes broke their own states’ laws by not voting for the candidate to whom they were pledged.


Those seeking to submit slates of alternative electors in 2020 wanted to remove duly chosen electors by fiat and reverse the outcome in battleground states won by Biden and certified by state election officials. No one has been charged in that effort yet, but Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco told CNN that federal prosecutors were looking into the fraudulent elector certifications.

...

While the 2016 effort was aimed at influencing duly chosen electors, the 2020 push sought to create lists of electors who would vote for Trump in battleground states that he lost and where the Republicans falsely claimed there had been widespread election irregularities.

read it and go crawl back under your rock...

Post Misleadingly Equates 2016 Democratic Effort to Trump's 2020 'Alternate Electors' - FactCheck.org

After the 2016 presidential election, some progressive Democrats tried to convince electors for Donald Trump to switch their Electoral College votes to Hillary Clinton. But a conservative commentator misleadingly claimed in a social media post that the Democrats were "calling for alternate...

www.factcheck.org

Trump is not going to be going to prison.