Judicial Watch Uncovers Biden Still Sending Billions to Afghanistan and Refusing Auditors to Investigate

Yes, when the Govt says they are sending money to Afghanistan, I believe them. Hell, the story in the OP says that they are sending money to Afghanistan and you believed it, so clearly the Govt was telling the truth when they said they were sending money to Afghanistan
why is the xiden admin not allowing the IG to audit? that’s what the Link in the OP is discussing


why are you gaslighting the issue and deflecting?
 
Yes, when the Govt says they are sending money to Afghanistan, I believe them. Hell, the story in the OP says that they are sending money to Afghanistan and you believed it, so clearly the Govt was telling the truth when they said they were sending money to Afghanistan




Uh huh, and here you are bleating some more. Why is the IG not allowed to audit?
 
why is the xiden admin not allowing the IG to audit? that’s what the Link in the OP is discussing


why are you gaslighting the issue and deflecting?



Because he is chinesgroomercrat stooge.
 
Oh? You trust the government that has been proven to lie on multiple occasions?

Talk about a dumb mother fucking sheep.

You are the poster child for dumb mother fucking sheep.

No he is not, but your post shows you to be incompetent to handle your own affairs. Paranoia and mistrust is a sign of mental incompetence.

The OP claimed that the government was providing foreign aid to Afghanistan and HIDING such payments from the American people. Gator posted links to the government websites announcing such payments, and showing that the government is NOT hiding aid to Afghanistan, and YOU say the links should be disregarded because the government lies.

You shouldn't be allowed out of the house alone. You might hurt yourself.
 
why is the xiden admin not allowing the IG to audit? that’s what the Link in the OP is discussing


why are you gaslighting the issue and deflecting?

The link in the OP is full of shit. The link in the OP said it was a secret that money is going to Afghanistan, yet the State Dept puts it on its website that money is going to Afghanistan
 
The link in the OP is full of shit. The link in the OP said it was a secret that money is going to Afghanistan, yet the State Dept puts it on its website that money is going to Afghanistan



Why is the IG not allowed to audit?

THAT IS THE QUESTION, YOU DUMB MOTHER FUCKING SHEEP!
 
That's not what the OP is about little sheep.

FOCUS! Dumbass.

Yes, the OP said that the Govt is sending money to Afghanistan and you believe him.

The Govt says that the Govt is sending money to Afghanistan and you call them liars for saying they are sending money to Afghanistan?

Holy fuck, this is a new level of stupid even for you.
 
Yes, the OP said that the Govt is sending money to Afghanistan and you believe him.

The Govt says that the Govt is sending money to Afghanistan and you call them liars for saying they are sending money to Afghanistan?

Holy fuck, this is a new level of stupid even for you.



Talking in circles again. Typical ewe, being a dumb motherfucking sheep
 
Why is the IG not allowed to audit?

THAT IS THE QUESTION, YOU DUMB MOTHER FUCKING SHEEP!

Why would the IG need to audit this??? Funding was approved by Congress, and is being distributed accordingly. Is there any question as to the legality of such payments? That's the ONLY reason the IG would be auditing of the payments.

The Gateway Pundit story only has ANY validity if the payments are in fact, not approved by Congress, and are being hidden from the American people.

Since both of those aspects of this particular piece of fake news have been thoroughly debunked, you just look dumber and dumber with each post. Why are YOU incapable of admitting you've been fooled by the Gateway Pundit, yet again.

You should quit while you're behind.
 
The link in the OP is full of shit. The link in the OP said it was a secret that money is going to Afghanistan, yet the State Dept puts it on its website that money is going to Afghanistan
The link in the OP discussed the xiden admin not allow the IG to audit as required by law. What’s secret is what is being sent ….because xiden is blocking the IG.

clearly you didn’t read the link
 
The link in the OP discussed the xiden admin not allow the IG to audit as required by law. What’s secret is what is being sent ….because xiden is blocking the IG.

clearly you didn’t read the link

Why would anyone read a link to the Gateway Pundit???? I don't ever read "Questionable Sources" because even when the start with a germ of a fact, they paper it over with lies and conspiracy theories to support their point of view.

The Special Inspector General is in charge of auditing funds for the "Afghanistan Reconstruction Program". This program ended when Donald Trump signed the Surrender Agreement with the Taliban. Administration Officials are arguing that the SIGAR's requests to audit ongoing aid are "invalid" and that NONE of the information requested related to "Afghan reconstruction funds".

"The officials — Richard Visek, State’s acting legal advisor, and Margaret Taylor, USAID’s general counsel — argued in the letter that SIGAR’s jurisdiction is limited to “reconstruction purposes,” which does not include humanitarian and other development assistance."

This is a far cry from what the OP or the Gateway Pundit article implied. This is a perfect example as to why the GP is such a bad source. They take a germ of fact - the SIGAR is being denied information to complete an audit, and then turn it into a "conspiracy theory".


I'm pretty sure that this comment from the Politico article has much more to do with the Biden's Administration Stance on such an audit, but they do have a point. None of these things which the SIGAR has criticized have ANYTHING to do with the Afghanistan Reconstruction Program, whatsoever, and he should have stuck to the job he was assigned.

"State Department spokesperson Ned Price said SIGAR’s most recent report on the collapse of the Afghan forces, which blasted both President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump for withdrawing from the country, “does not reflect the consensus view of the State Department or of the U.S. Government, for that matter.”
 
Why would anyone read a link to the Gateway Pundit???? I don't ever read "Questionable Sources" because even when the start with a germ of a fact, they paper it over with lies and conspiracy theories to support their point of view.

The Special Inspector General is in charge of auditing funds for the "Afghanistan Reconstruction Program". This program ended when Donald Trump signed the Surrender Agreement with the Taliban. Administration Officials are arguing that the SIGAR's requests to audit ongoing aid are "invalid" and that NONE of the information requested related to "Afghan reconstruction funds".

"The officials — Richard Visek, State’s acting legal advisor, and Margaret Taylor, USAID’s general counsel — argued in the letter that SIGAR’s jurisdiction is limited to “reconstruction purposes,” which does not include humanitarian and other development assistance."

This is a far cry from what the OP or the Gateway Pundit article implied. This is a perfect example as to why the GP is such a bad source. They take a germ of fact - the SIGAR is being denied information to complete an audit, and then turn it into a "conspiracy theory".


I'm pretty sure that this comment from the Politico article has much more to do with the Biden's Administration Stance on such an audit, but they do have a point. None of these things which the SIGAR has criticized have ANYTHING to do with the Afghanistan Reconstruction Program, whatsoever, and he should have stuck to the job he was assigned.

"State Department spokesperson Ned Price said SIGAR’s most recent report on the collapse of the Afghan forces, which blasted both President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump for withdrawing from the country, “does not reflect the consensus view of the State Department or of the U.S. Government, for that matter.”
Trump never signed a surrender agreement and no the IG is still there being stonewalled by Taliban Xiden

Why do you lie so much?
 
Trump never signed a surrender agreement

True, Trump did not sign it himself, it was signed by his representative after Trump gave it his approval.

You really got her that time!
 
True, Trump did not sign it himself, it was signed by his representative after Trump gave it his approval.

You really got her that time!
geez even xiden said he ignored that agreement.

trumps agreement called for certain conditions precedent…xiden ignored it all and surrender.

Why do you continue to push lies?
 

Forum List

Back
Top