Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
gosh I wonder why the President would be informed of a national security threatQUESTION!
why did Obama know about Flynn's call with Kislyak before the acting AG knew?
i'm just asking questions as an honest citizen. i'm a journalist!
Both Powell and the DOJ report says he was entrapped.The defense does not have to make any claim or defense until the prosecution rests at trial.No one is making the claim of entrapment now either. It’d be ridiculous.Not before having those handwritten notes.Entrapment is definitely not what anyone is claiming happened.Which is routinely done, especially when the prosecution failed to disclose and produce evidence of investigators trying to trap him....as does ANY criminal defendant who wants to withdraw his plea.I know what perjury is. What is the specific perjury charge here
That Flynn admitted he lied to the FBI (and other crimes) under penalty of perjury, and then he took it back. (actually made a diametric claim)
Jesus.
.
The difference is Flynn is trying to withdraw his plea AFTER CONVICTION.
.
You're saying he can't make that argument now, after the prosecutorial misconduct of failure to disclose those notes comes to light?
It's over? No more defense?
.
What do you think is supposed to happen? Defense lawyers are required to brief he court and all parties on their case-in-chief or defense before trial???
You don't seem to know how this shit works.
.
You’re being overly pendantic. The point is that the claim of entrapment is absurd. No one in their right mind would make that claim.
Powell has been making defenses of Flynn to tru to get his plea reversed. I don’t believe that was ever adjudicated. Part of reversing a plea may include making claims of innocence.
We all know he wasn't any kind of a threat to National Security. He was only a threat to corrupt minions in the deep state.gosh I wonder why the President would be informed of a national security threatQUESTION!
why did Obama know about Flynn's call with Kislyak before the acting AG knew?
i'm just asking questions as an honest citizen. i'm a journalist!
Flynn was communicating with Kislyak as a private citizen, thats the security threat.We all know he wasn't any kind of a threat to National Security. He was only a threat to corrupt minions in the deep state.gosh I wonder why the President would be informed of a national security threatQUESTION!
why did Obama know about Flynn's call with Kislyak before the acting AG knew?
i'm just asking questions as an honest citizen. i'm a journalist!
How many times do I have to fucking say this. The presidential elect transition team is a legally recognized governmental entity since 1968. Once elections are over, foreign diplomats could give a fuck about the current administration, they get their foot in the door with the upcoming administration, which should be obvious to y’all because that current administration is only going to be making decisions for a few months. Obama was talking with foreign leaders and diplomats when he was still campaigning.Flynn was communicating with Kislyak as a private citizen, thats the security threat.We all know he wasn't any kind of a threat to National Security. He was only a threat to corrupt minions in the deep state.gosh I wonder why the President would be informed of a national security threatQUESTION!
why did Obama know about Flynn's call with Kislyak before the acting AG knew?
i'm just asking questions as an honest citizen. i'm a journalist!
Prosecutorial misconduct isn't good enough for you?You can withdraw a guilty plea up until sentencing.Are you telling me that any defendant who withdraws a guilty plea after entering the plea and answering the judge's question in the affirmative that he pleading guilty because he is guilty and for no other reason, should be prosecuted for perjury? Is that you position?
(this is a huge trap)
.
We are talking about changing their plea AFTER conviction. They are free to do so any time before that. After conviction is when it's too late.
But you have to give a good reason.
ROFL! He was about to become the National Security Advisor, you fucking dumbass. There was no security threat. That's pure TDS propaganda.Flynn was communicating with Kislyak as a private citizen, thats the security threat.We all know he wasn't any kind of a threat to National Security. He was only a threat to corrupt minions in the deep state.gosh I wonder why the President would be informed of a national security threatQUESTION!
why did Obama know about Flynn's call with Kislyak before the acting AG knew?
i'm just asking questions as an honest citizen. i'm a journalist!
Intentional withholding of exculpatory evidence isn't an error.Before conviction, the plea can be withdrawn freely. After conviction, as you said, only upon showing of a good reason.You can withdraw a guilty plea up until sentencing.
But you have to give a good reason.
Even after sentencing it can be withdrawn, but only in the interest of justice. Such as proof of innocence, not prosecution errors.
Michael Flynn has admitted to calling up Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak -- at the behest of other members of the incoming administration and likely the president himself -- and telling him not to worry about any U.S. retaliation against Russia for its election meddling, because when the Trump team took office they'd make it all go away. He might as well have said, "Tell Vlad thanks for the help. We've got his back."ROFL! He was about to become the National Security Advisor, you fucking dumbass. There was no security threat. That's pure TDS propaganda.Flynn was communicating with Kislyak as a private citizen, thats the security threat.We all know he wasn't any kind of a threat to National Security. He was only a threat to corrupt minions in the deep state.gosh I wonder why the President would be informed of a national security threatQUESTION!
why did Obama know about Flynn's call with Kislyak before the acting AG knew?
i'm just asking questions as an honest citizen. i'm a journalist!
Because he is part of the transition team, Dummy.Michael Flynn has admitted to calling up Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak -- at the behest of other members of the incoming administration and likely the president himself -- and telling him not to worry about any U.S. retaliation against Russia for its election meddling, because when the Trump team took office they'd make it all go away. He might as well have said, "Tell Vlad thanks for the help. We've got his back."ROFL! He was about to become the National Security Advisor, you fucking dumbass. There was no security threat. That's pure TDS propaganda.Flynn was communicating with Kislyak as a private citizen, thats the security threat.We all know he wasn't any kind of a threat to National Security. He was only a threat to corrupt minions in the deep state.gosh I wonder why the President would be informed of a national security threatQUESTION!
why did Obama know about Flynn's call with Kislyak before the acting AG knew?
i'm just asking questions as an honest citizen. i'm a journalist!
How is this legal?
Because he was a member of the incoming administration, you fucking dumbass. When has it ever been illegal? The Logan act has never been successfully prosecuted and is almost certainly unconstitutional.Michael Flynn has admitted to calling up Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak -- at the behest of other members of the incoming administration and likely the president himself -- and telling him not to worry about any U.S. retaliation against Russia for its election meddling, because when the Trump team took office they'd make it all go away. He might as well have said, "Tell Vlad thanks for the help. We've got his back."ROFL! He was about to become the National Security Advisor, you fucking dumbass. There was no security threat. That's pure TDS propaganda.Flynn was communicating with Kislyak as a private citizen, thats the security threat.We all know he wasn't any kind of a threat to National Security. He was only a threat to corrupt minions in the deep state.gosh I wonder why the President would be informed of a national security threatQUESTION!
why did Obama know about Flynn's call with Kislyak before the acting AG knew?
i'm just asking questions as an honest citizen. i'm a journalist!
How is this legal?
WTF is your source here? You obviously copied and pasted, but didn’t take the extra 2 seconds to post the full article. My guess is, it’s a trash source, and it’s quoting someone whose clearly biased and paraphrasing what they wish Flynn said...which was asking Russia not to escalate.Michael Flynn has admitted to calling up Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak -- at the behest of other members of the incoming administration and likely the president himself -- and telling him not to worry about any U.S. retaliation against Russia for its election meddling, because when the Trump team took office they'd make it all go away. He might as well have said, "Tell Vlad thanks for the help. We've got his back."ROFL! He was about to become the National Security Advisor, you fucking dumbass. There was no security threat. That's pure TDS propaganda.Flynn was communicating with Kislyak as a private citizen, thats the security threat.We all know he wasn't any kind of a threat to National Security. He was only a threat to corrupt minions in the deep state.gosh I wonder why the President would be informed of a national security threatQUESTION!
why did Obama know about Flynn's call with Kislyak before the acting AG knew?
i'm just asking questions as an honest citizen. i'm a journalist!
How is this legal?
listen carefully:`WTF is your source here? You obviously copied and pasted, but didn’t take the extra 2 seconds to post the full article. My guess is, it’s a trash source, and it’s quoting someone whose clearly biased and paraphrasing what they wish Flynn said...which was asking Russia not to escalate.Michael Flynn has admitted to calling up Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak -- at the behest of other members of the incoming administration and likely the president himself -- and telling him not to worry about any U.S. retaliation against Russia for its election meddling, because when the Trump team took office they'd make it all go away. He might as well have said, "Tell Vlad thanks for the help. We've got his back."ROFL! He was about to become the National Security Advisor, you fucking dumbass. There was no security threat. That's pure TDS propaganda.Flynn was communicating with Kislyak as a private citizen, thats the security threat.We all know he wasn't any kind of a threat to National Security. He was only a threat to corrupt minions in the deep state.gosh I wonder why the President would be informed of a national security threatQUESTION!
why did Obama know about Flynn's call with Kislyak before the acting AG knew?
i'm just asking questions as an honest citizen. i'm a journalist!
How is this legal?
Interesting note, apparently Sullivan can’t explain his actions to the appellate court, so he may be the first judge in history to hire a lawyer to do his job for him. This guy is supposedly a federal judge, I mean wtf, he can’t even give the slightest excuse on why he’s creating the power to prosecute for himself out of thin air. This is ridiculous
WTF is your source here? You obviously copied and pasted, but didn’t take the extra 2 seconds to post the full article. My guess is, it’s a trash source, and it’s quoting someone whose clearly biased and paraphrasing what they wish Flynn said...which was asking Russia not to escalate.
listen carefully:`WTF is your source here? You obviously copied and pasted, but didn’t take the extra 2 seconds to post the full article. My guess is, it’s a trash source, and it’s quoting someone whose clearly biased and paraphrasing what they wish Flynn said...which was asking Russia not to escalate.Michael Flynn has admitted to calling up Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak -- at the behest of other members of the incoming administration and likely the president himself -- and telling him not to worry about any U.S. retaliation against Russia for its election meddling, because when the Trump team took office they'd make it all go away. He might as well have said, "Tell Vlad thanks for the help. We've got his back."ROFL! He was about to become the National Security Advisor, you fucking dumbass. There was no security threat. That's pure TDS propaganda.Flynn was communicating with Kislyak as a private citizen, thats the security threat.We all know he wasn't any kind of a threat to National Security. He was only a threat to corrupt minions in the deep state.gosh I wonder why the President would be informed of a national security threatQUESTION!
why did Obama know about Flynn's call with Kislyak before the acting AG knew?
i'm just asking questions as an honest citizen. i'm a journalist!
How is this legal?
Interesting note, apparently Sullivan can’t explain his actions to the appellate court, so he may be the first judge in history to hire a lawyer to do his job for him. This guy is supposedly a federal judge, I mean wtf, he can’t even give the slightest excuse on why he’s creating the power to prosecute for himself out of thin air. This is ridiculous
From what we’ve heard of what’s leaked, remember the leaks have been only stuff that paints the trump admin in a bad light, it’s Flynn asking Russia not to escalate, and to veto sanctions on Israel. If Flynn said something fucked up, even if it was out of context, it would’ve been leaked, just like everything else was at that time. And not wanting to release calls with foreign diplomats is understandable, we don’t want to set the precedent of putting diplomats private calls and laundry, dirty or clean, out there over political fights. That’s just no way to do foreign policy, I think both sides can agree on that. I’m shocked Ukrainian pres let us do it.WTF is your source here? You obviously copied and pasted, but didn’t take the extra 2 seconds to post the full article. My guess is, it’s a trash source, and it’s quoting someone whose clearly biased and paraphrasing what they wish Flynn said...which was asking Russia not to escalate.
They won’t release the transcript of the call.
Using the Sullivan precedent, maybe some Republican Judge can start bringing charges against Comey and BrennanIt’s about the rule of law over dropping a case because the defendant has political connections, and that is what this whole thing really is. It is doubtful he will not drop it. But I am glad he is willing to hear things. The gross misconduct in this case is that of Barr.
