Judge strikes down voter id law

[GuyPinestra]

Guy, you can pant and chant and rant, and you are still wrong.

The link was posted. You just don't like it.

Fake Malarkey does it again! You're such a lying hack, Fakey. It would be kinda cute if it wasn't so damned pathetic...

 

[squeeze berry]

Texas Voter ID Law Rejected By Federal Court

Yea, don't stand in the idiots' way. Like we are supposed to believe that a person who never held a job, applied for welfare, drove a car, had a bank account, wrote a check, bought cigarettes or alcohol, flew on a plane, bought a bus ticket, visited a military base, got a credit card, rented a house, owned a house or went to school would bother to actually register and vote? The left excuse is total bullshit!!!

The only logical explanation is that they want illegal aliens to vote.

When the actual rate of occurance of voter fraud is between .00004% and .0009% of the time, and those occurances were mostly accidental, the only logical explanation for such a strong push by Republicans for voter ID laws is because they can't win the election in any other way.

how do you know the actual rate if you don't bother to check?

 

[Bigfoot]

There is nothing wrong with needing an ID to vote.

 

[Seawytch]

Once again, the question that one one who opposes Voter ID can answer:

How do you know the person who registered is the person voting?

When a car is driven, without a governor, how do we know the driver will obey the speed limit?

14108. In addition to the provisions contained in Section 14107,
the roster shall contain, in no less than 6-point type at the head of
each page, the following words: "WARNING: It is a crime punishable
by imprisonment in the state prison or in county jail for anyone to
fraudulently vote, fraudulently attempt to vote, vote more than once,
attempt to vote more than once, impersonate a voter, or attempt to
impersonate a voter (Elections Code Sec. 18560)."​

When you sign the Roster of Voters in California, you are signing under penalty of perjury that you are who you say you are and live where you say you live.

California is not an "ID" state. In accordance with HAVA, the voter provides their identification at the time of Registration. If this identification does not clear the statewide database, the voter must provide identification at the polling place. There are over 30 types of identification that can be provided.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Got it. You don't like that you are wrong. Tuff, weak guy.

Guy, you can pant and chant and rant, and you are still wrong.

The link was posted. You just don't like it.

Fake Malarkey does it again! You're such a lying hack, Fakey. It would be kinda cute if it wasn't so damned pathetic...

 

[daveman]

Once again, the question that one one who opposes Voter ID can answer:

How do you know the person who registered is the person voting?

Proxy votes are the favored method of election fraud. democrats have used the proxy vote fraud for the last century and honestly view themselves as entitled to these fraudulent votes.

The way things currently work, these proxy votes are virtually undetectable. leaving democrats to smugly declare "what fraud?" Using names on the voter roles that belong to dead or fictitious registrants, democrats pay bums or illegal aliens to vote using the registered name.

Even an after election investigation won't reveal the fraud, a vote was cast and there was a registered voter. Without the requirement of ID, this fraud is undetectable and unstoppable. That is why partisan democrats like Jake Starkey and C_Clayton are so insane about stopping voter ID. Millions of fraudulent votes are on the table, and the democrats view this fraud as their birthright. Clearly there are leftist judges working to preserve voter fraud as well.

Nailed it. It's the left's sense of entitlement.

They're entitled to political power, so they're entitled to fraudulent votes to gain and keep that power.

 

[daveman]

Once again, the question that one one who opposes Voter ID can answer:

How do you know the person who registered is the person voting?

When a car is driven, without a governor, how do we know the driver will obey the speed limit?

14108. In addition to the provisions contained in Section 14107,
the roster shall contain, in no less than 6-point type at the head of
each page, the following words: "WARNING: It is a crime punishable
by imprisonment in the state prison or in county jail for anyone to
fraudulently vote, fraudulently attempt to vote, vote more than once,
attempt to vote more than once, impersonate a voter, or attempt to
impersonate a voter (Elections Code Sec. 18560)."​

When you sign the Roster of Voters in California, you are signing under penalty of perjury that you are who you say you are and live where you say you live.

California is not an "ID" state. In accordance with HAVA, the voter provides their identification at the time of Registration. If this identification does not clear the statewide database, the voter must provide identification at the polling place. There are over 30 types of identification that can be provided.

Lots of things are against the law.

People still choose to break the law.

Do you really think anyone's concerned about breaking voting laws? They know Democrats will cover for them.

 

[JakeStarkey]

That in fact is how the reactionary far right works: lies, misdefinitions, revisions, and thuggery.

When far right felons break the law, they know the far right will cover for them.

Once again, the question that one one who opposes Voter ID can answer:

How do you know the person who registered is the person voting?

Proxy votes are the favored method of election fraud. democrats have used the proxy vote fraud for the last century and honestly view themselves as entitled to these fraudulent votes.

The way things currently work, these proxy votes are virtually undetectable. leaving democrats to smugly declare "what fraud?" Using names on the voter roles that belong to dead or fictitious registrants, democrats pay bums or illegal aliens to vote using the registered name.

Even an after election investigation won't reveal the fraud, a vote was cast and there was a registered voter. Without the requirement of ID, this fraud is undetectable and unstoppable. That is why partisan democrats like Jake Starkey and C_Clayton are so insane about stopping voter ID. Millions of fraudulent votes are on the table, and the democrats view this fraud as their birthright. Clearly there are leftist judges working to preserve voter fraud as well.

Nailed it. It's the left's sense of entitlement.

They're entitled to political power, so they're entitled to fraudulent votes to gain and keep that power.

 

[daveman]

That in fact is how the reactionary far right works: lies, misdefinitions, revisions, and thuggery.

When far right felons break the law, they know the far right will cover for them.

Your mindless repetition of leftist talking points is noted, and is not at all surprising.

 

[JakeStarkey]

daveman's mindless repetition of far right lies, misdefinitions, revisions, and digital thuggery is based on the hope that other far righters will cover for him.

You are not a responsible Republican, daveman, just a far right internet thug.

 

[daveman]

daveman's mindless repetition of far right lies, misdefinitions, revisions, and digital thuggery is based on the hope that other far righters will cover for him.

You are not a responsible Republican, daveman, just a far right internet thug.

I'm curious how many leftists are going to thank you for your post.

 

[JakeStarkey]

I am curious how many extremists will defend you, faker.

 

[GuyPinestra]

I am curious how many extremists will defend you, faker.

Ohh, the IRONY....

 

[Full-Auto]

I am curious how many extremists will defend you, faker.

Faker, from jake the flake fake.


Who opened the kool-aid before noon???

 

[JakeStarkey]

There is the first far right faker to defend an another extremist righty thug.

Glad you woke up, full-auto.

 

[daveman]

I am curious how many extremists will defend you, faker.

Once again, Fakey proves he's just not bright enough to come up with his own insults.

Yup -- you're a leftist, all right.

 

[daveman]

There is the first far right faker to defend an another extremist righty thug.

Glad you woke up, full-auto.

"Thug"?

Yes, leftists believe that disagreeing with them is an act of violence.

What a sissy bedwetter you are.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Once again, the question that one one who opposes Voter ID can answer:

How do you know the person who registered is the person voting?

When a car is driven, without a governor, how do we know the driver will obey the speed limit?

14108. In addition to the provisions contained in Section 14107,
the roster shall contain, in no less than 6-point type at the head of
each page, the following words: "WARNING: It is a crime punishable
by imprisonment in the state prison or in county jail for anyone to
fraudulently vote, fraudulently attempt to vote, vote more than once,
attempt to vote more than once, impersonate a voter, or attempt to
impersonate a voter (Elections Code Sec. 18560)."​

When you sign the Roster of Voters in California, you are signing under penalty of perjury that you are who you say you are and live where you say you live.

California is not an "ID" state. In accordance with HAVA, the voter provides their identification at the time of Registration. If this identification does not clear the statewide database, the voter must provide identification at the polling place. There are over 30 types of identification that can be provided.

As is the case in most states, a voter is not required to prove at every election he’s not attempting to violate the law.

 

[dblack]

As is the case in most states, a voter is not required to prove at every election he’s not attempting to violate the law.

Guilty until proven innocent. It's the new American way.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yes, far leftists and far rightist are internet thugs here, because they cannot logically defend their positions.

We will see which other far righty thugs defend, daveman.

There is the first far right faker to defend an another extremist righty thug.

Glad you woke up, full-auto.

"Thug"?

Yes, leftists believe that disagreeing with them is an act of violence.

What a sissy bedwetter you are.