Judge Boardman ignored facts when blocking Trump’s E.O. “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship”.

[johnwk]

Where does it say "unobstructed."

It does not.

it sure does. See the CONGRESSIONAL DEBATES: ALIEN ENEMIES, pages 1790-1791 where Representative Otis defends the bill and discretionary power delegated to the president:


"Mr. O. believed, that, to provide for this detention of the person, was all Congress could now do. If the bill was recommitted, he did not think any definite provision could be made. It was necessary the President should have the power of judging in this case, and that punishment ought not to depend upon the slow operations of a trial."

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

it sure does. See the CONGRESSIONAL DEBATES: ALIEN ENEMIES, pages 1790-1791 where Representative Otis defends the bill and discretionary power delegated to the president:


"Mr. O. believed, that, to provide for this detention of the person, was all Congress could now do. If the bill was recommitted, he did not think any definite provision could be made. It was necessary the President should have the power of judging in this case, and that punishment ought not to depend upon the slow operations of a trial."

The Court makes that decision. Not your ilk.

 

[johnwk]

The Court makes that decision.

Not under the Alien Enemies Act.

The bottom line is, the very purpose and legislative intent of the Alien Enemies Act was to provide the President with extraordinary power, including unobstructed discretionary deportation power, to deal with and remove aliens on American soil who may pose a threat to the general welfare of the United States and her citizens.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Not under the Alien Enemies Act.

The bottom line is, the very purpose and legislative intent of the Alien Enemies Act was to provide the President with extraordinary power, including unobstructed discretionary deportation power, to deal with and remove aliens on American soil who may pose a threat to the general welfare of the United States and her citizens.

That is your opinion, unsupported by the Act.

 

[Dante]

To be more accurate, they are not "liberal judges" but rather, they are notoriously evil doers working hand in hand with those working to destroy and replace our constitutionally limited Republican form of Government with an Administrative ruling class unrestrained by our written Constitution.

Here is where very early on you take your own thread right off the rails...

 

[Dante]

“If aliens might be admitted indiscriminately to enjoy all the rights of citizens at the will of a single state, the Union might itself be endangered by an influx of foreigners, hostile to its institutions, ignorant of its powers, and incapable of a due estimate of its privileges." - Joseph Story

Not sure what you believe this has to do with the arguments laid out here. You appear to post lots of words from different places believing the more crap the better and more sound your argument.

Too bad you weren't confident enough to post your argument with a few simple sentences.

 

[Dante]

Amdt14.S1.1.1 Historical Background on Citizenship Clause​

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt14-S1-1-1/ALDE_00000811/

...

Fourteenth Amendment, Section 1:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Based on the first sentence of Section 1, the Court has held that a child born in the United States of Chinese parents who were ineligible to be naturalized themselves is nevertheless a citizen of the United States entitled to all the rights and privileges of citizenship.1 The requirement that a person be "subject to the jurisdiction thereof," however, excludes its application to children born of diplomatic representatives of a foreign state, children born of alien enemies in hostile occupation,2 or children of members of Indian tribes subject to tribal laws.3 In addition, the citizenship of children born on vessels in United States territorial waters or on the high seas has generally been held by the lower courts to be determined by the citizenship of the parents.4 Citizens of the United States within the meaning of this Amendment must be natural and not artificial persons; a corporate body is not a citizen of the United States.5

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt14-S1-1-2/ALDE_00000812/

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt14-S1-1-3/ALDE_00000813/

Executive Order: Protecting The Meaning And Value Of American Citizenship​