legislative intent

. From the very beginning of our nation's founding, and when debating our Nations` first RULE OF NATURALIZATION, FEB. 3RD, 1790, page ll56, Annals of Congress Representative Burk emphatically states the introduction of some foreign nationals ought to be considered “. . . as a high misdemeanor.”...

FACT: Unwritten federal public policy, and only federal unwritten public policy, now recognizes citizenship for the offspring of illegal entrant foreign nationals born on American soil. But the qualifier in the 14th Amendment “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” was explicitly adopted by...

For those who are dedicated supporters and defenders of the miracle our forefathers created (the Constitution of the United States of America), the MAJORITY’S OPINION in Obergefell v. Hodges, handed down June 26, 2015, like a number of previous “precedent” setting opinions, will long be remember...

See: Clarence Thomas breaks with precedent “He clarified, “But … the precedent should be respectful of our legal tradition, and our country and our laws, and be based on something – not just something somebody dreamt up and others went along with.” Thomas has notably dissented from the...

See: Supreme Court agrees to hear challenge to Trump’s birthright citizenship order. "In an order released Friday afternoon, the justices said they would take up for review Trump v. Barbara, a case originally brought in a federal court in New Hampshire by a group of people whose children could...

Kim Davis should sue Justices Sotomayor and Kagan under the Seventh Amendment for the misfeasance and nonfeasance exhibited in the majority opinion in Obergefell v. Hodges which has led to a $100,000 damages verdict against her, plus $260,000 for attorney’s fees, for allegedly violating the law...

See: Appeals court won’t lift Boasberg’s order blocking Alien Enemies Act 03/26/25 4:18 PM ET What Judge Karen Henderson ignores is the actual legislative intent of the Alien Enemies Act expressed during its creation, and gives context to its text, e.g., see H. of R., Alien Enemies, May, 22nd...

No hearing before judge required under Alien Enemies Act The fact is, under the Act of July 6, 1798, “An Act respecting Alien Enemies” aliens were deported without a hearing before a United States judge. See: Ludecke v. Watkins (1948) Justice Frankfurter observed: The Court also held: The...

As will be demonstrated below, US District Judge Deborah Boardman misrepresented actual facts when issuing her preliminary injunction against President Trump’s Executive Order titled “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship”. Judge Boardman writes: “The President’s novel...

How many times have we heard that Plyler v. Doe confirms, the offspring of an illegal entrant foreign national born on American soil, becomes a United States citizen upon birth? But as it turns out, that is a blatant lie, perpetuated to legitimatize "anchor babies", and the social and financial...

NEWSMAX’s go-to guy for legal pontificating seems to be former Judge Andrew Napolitano. If NEWSMAX has employed Andrew Napolitano as a talking head to reflect NEWSMAX’S mission, it would be safe to assume that mission is certainly not to support and defend the text of our federal constitution...

. See: White House warns Texas governor against 'meddling' on immigration “Immigration enforcement is a federal authority, and states should not be… meddling in it,” White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said, accusing Abbott of having “a track record of causing chaos and confusion at...

. The purpose of the Tenth Amendment, which was added to our constitution with nine other amendments, was specifically, and intentionally, to prevent misconstruction or abuse of the newly created government’s powers. And, these amendments, referred to as the “Bill of Rights”, are ten...

Having followed the Ketanji Brown Jackson Supreme Court nominee hearings, I find it not only astounding that one of the most important lines of questioning was suspiciously absent when the Republican Leadership questioned Ketanji Brown Jackson, but it was also nowhere to be found in our popular...

One of the Supreme Court‘s “inventions” used to impose its will upon the people unknown to those who framed and ratified our Constitution, are various tests the court has created which are now used to circumvent and set aside the documented intentions and beliefs under which the various...