Oddball
Unobtanium Member
He removed most of them...The war hawks conned him into leaving a couple hundred behind as "advisors" and "security".He did just that with Syria, and it took two false flags and a fuckton of neocon nagging to keep the very small contingent that remains there in place.Safely getting out of wars is harder than getting into them. Perhaps if he had some support for doing so from the haters in Congress it would be done faster. Heck, at this point I believe he could announce the end of ANY conflict in which we are involved and Pelosi and crew would shriek bloody murder that he can't do it, it would be illegal for him to do it, he's a cad for wanting to do it, etc.Except that Trump has worked to end the interventions....One of the few things that he's done that I fully approve of.Well Goldberg is a well knownWell Goldberg is a well known Conservative so it only makes sense he wouldn't support Trump.Conservativeneocon....
Fixed that for ya.
Well that is pretty much today's Conservative position. Generally speaking one speaks of a "Neocon" as someone who supports constant interventions elsewhere. We have had that for all 4 years under Trump so they can't disagree there.
No he hasn't. He has made hollow worthless statements. Statements that the "neocons" simply note that he isn't going to do anything about and he doesn't.
Yes, he has kept us out of worthless wars, the first to do so since carter. Unlike shrub and o, who brought us endless adventures in the desert, arab springs, supporting rebels in syria, etc.
He has also kept us in all of them also.
He didn't remove troops. He only moved them from one area in Syria to another. Seems Trump supporters want to blame everyone else for Trump's failures. Nothing is ever his fault.
Seems the haters easily confuse their misinformed opinions for the facts.