are the "motor bosses" the bosses of that half
don's carpenters work as independent
I am sure they have a rough idea. It depends on what our values are. Prior to Thatcher and Regan we were, certainly in the UK, working towards a country where everyone had a chance and no one was living in absolute poverty which means you do not have enough money for the essential, a roof over your head, food and required heating. Instead at that time we spoke of relative poverty where some people did not have sufficient money to join in what were thought of as the norms of society but did have the essentials. When I heard one of the Tories saying they were no longer going to speak about 'relative poverty' when they first got into power I thought Oh No and we have moved so that sometimes people are dying here for want of a meal or even suicide because of their situation. A lot of those people were the disabled who got their money cut. It goes with democracy to try and give everyone as much of an equal start as possible. We obviously are not born equal so other things need to happen like giving poor families fruit for their kids and giving their kids an early start in education and so on. We were doing that till 2010 when the Tories came in. Acting in such a way allows every hone to feel a part of society and curs down on mental illness and crime. Sadly the Tories only care about letting the Rich get Richer. Half of them went to Etam anyway. The
Many are, or work for smaller outfits.
Why do you mention those 8 richest people none of whom has anything to do with Britain? The topic is about the UK. I hope you aren't going to organise the world revolution.I am sure they have a rough idea. It depends on what our values are. Prior to Thatcher and Regan we were, certainly in the UK, working towards a country where everyone had a chance and no one was living in absolute poverty which means you do not have enough money for the essential, a roof over your head, food and required heating. Instead at that time we spoke of relative poverty where some people did not have sufficient money to join in what were thought of as the norms of society but did have the essentials. When I heard one of the Tories saying they were no longer going to speak about 'relative poverty' when they first got into power I thought Oh No and we have moved so that sometimes people are dying here for want of a meal or even suicide because of their situation. A lot of those people were the disabled who got their money cut. It goes with democracy to try and give everyone as much of an equal start as possible. We obviously are not born equal so other things need to happen like giving poor families fruit for their kids and giving their kids an early start in education and so on. We were doing that till 2010 when the Tories came in. Acting in such a way allows every hone to feel a part of society and curs down on mental illness and crime. Sadly the Tories only care about letting the Rich get Richer. Half of them went to Etam anyway. The
Any way the Amnesty article suggests this
We don't leave the poorest and most incapable just to die there on their own. We work to make sure no one finds themselves in that position. That really is the choice.....but the Power of the richest 8 what do you think of that? It is about creating a situation where there is the possibility of social mobility. Social Mobility in the UK is pretty much dead. Obviously this is not necessarily talking about Capitalists but about being able to become a Professional.
They are paying for 2007/8 mistakes. Apart from in Iceland where the put them in jail. For everyone else they will be paying it out of their taxes for generations. The working people are again being asked to pay for the inflation this time and indeed have been having to pay for whatever was needed since 2007/8. That means just now while the landlord can still put the rent up and is doing that, the workers according to the Government must not get a pay rise to go with the 9% inflation. They have also paid with their jobs. For several years people were given the choice of a pay rise and some people made redundant or no pay rise. One really big one was that in all these economic deals which were going on between countries there was always a clause to protect the Capitalists from losing their money. It is not Capitalism but it is calling itself that. It is not allowing social mobility so it is not democratic.
Because that is todays Capitalism. I asked what do you think about 8 people having all that power. It is obscene.
What can I think about them? They are smart, lucky, reached what they wanted. Do I think that all their money should be taken away and given to the poor? No. Until they are proved to have gotten their fortunes illegaly.
Did not read that, sorry if that is true though.
OH !!!! the UK-----traditionally had very littleI am sure they have a rough idea. It depends on what our values are. Prior to Thatcher and Regan we were, certainly in the UK, working towards a country where everyone had a chance and no one was living in absolute poverty which means you do not have enough money for the essential, a roof over your head, food and required heating. Instead at that time we spoke of relative poverty where some people did not have sufficient money to join in what were thought of as the norms of society but did have the essentials. When I heard one of the Tories saying they were no longer going to speak about 'relative poverty' when they first got into power I thought Oh No and we have moved so that sometimes people are dying here for want of a meal or even suicide because of their situation. A lot of those people were the disabled who got their money cut. It goes with democracy to try and give everyone as much of an equal start as possible. We obviously are not born equal so other things need to happen like giving poor families fruit for their kids and giving their kids an early start in education and so on. We were doing that till 2010 when the Tories came in. Acting in such a way allows every hone to feel a part of society and curs down on mental illness and crime. Sadly the Tories only care about letting the Rich get Richer. Half of them went to Etam anyway. The
Any way the Amnesty article suggests this
We don't leave the poorest and most incapable just to die there on their own. We work to make sure no one finds themselves in that position. That really is the choice.....but the Power of the richest 8 what do you think of that? It is about creating a situation where there is the possibility of social mobility. Social Mobility in the UK is pretty much dead. Obviously this is not necessarily talking about Capitalists but about being able to become a Professional.
The US now has poor social mobility. Them and the UK are usually down among the worst in the Developed world. However during the 60's and 70's the UK had good social mobility. The Nordic Countries followed by much of Europe tend to be the best in the world now. I did not speak about social welfare.
I thought I already did that in the post 109.
Things can always get wors.e. But, like all socialists, I believe in looking forward. A country that lets a fund manager pay less tax than his cleaner is in urgent need of revision.
nypost.com
