Joe Biden IS Gutting Our First Amendment (Free Speech)

[hadit]

Right-wingers prefer to parrot just plain lies.

What was the lie?

 

[danielpalos]

There are reasons for that that have nothing to do with party identification. We've pointed them out to you multiple times.

Actions speak louder than words.

 

[danielpalos]

What was the lie?

Just about every Thing coming from the right-wing.

 

[hadit]

Just about every Thing coming from the right-wing.

So you don't know, you're just making it up.

 

[DBA]

No I'm not, everybody should be monitored.

What is wrong with you? Who the heck says that?

 

[DBA]

Limiting your speech on a private platform is not violating your free speech. Just like not allowing you to post everything you want here is not a violation of your free speech.

No, but selectively editing based on political beliefs should remove any protection for said entity. That is clearly what social platforms are doing.

 

[citygator]

And if "they don't want you to" is tied directly to Republican city government? Still okay with it?

“Tied” is not a legal term I am familiar with. No government can restrict free speech. If the govt tried to at this country club example we are using the country club can seek legal remedy through the courts. Getting a letter from the city saying you have fake news on your property isn’t restricting free speech.

 

[hadit]

“Tied” is not a legal term I am familiar with. No government can restrict free speech. If the govt tried to at this country club example we are using the country club can seek legal remedy through the courts. Getting a letter from the city saying you have fake news on your property isn’t restricting free speech.

It sounds like you have no problem with private enterprise coordinating and collaborating with the government to broadcast or restrict information based on the desires of the party in charge.

 

[Kondor3]

Not wrong. There is not opinion excluded from the First Amendment.

Correct.

Want to broadcast an opinion that contradicts medical science and which endangers others during a public health emergency and you will be silenced.

Want to broadcast an opinion about anything under the sun OTHER than that during a public health emergency and you're absolutely free to do so.

The Constitution and subsequent legislation empowers society to silence the crazies during a public health emergency.

Sux for the crazies... but it works for everyone else... including the dullards who would actually fall for such stupidity.

 

[Kondor3]

“Tied” is not a legal term I am familiar with. No government can restrict free speech. If the govt tried to at this country club example we are using the country club can seek legal remedy through the courts. Getting a letter from the city saying you have fake news on your property isn’t restricting free speech.

Yelling "Fire" falsely in a crowded theater can get you in trouble with the government.

Broadcasting military secrets publicly or to our adversaries can get you in trouble with the government.

Spreading disinformation about pandemic diseases to an extent that it might bring harm to others can get you in trouble with the government.

There are limits to the First... your opinion on the subject notwithstanding... case law is not on your side in such matters.

 

[Kondor3]

There is no "lawful authority" to suppress opinions the government doesn't like.

Your people engaged in Insurrection against the lawful authority of the United States.

They are now going to be made to pay the price for their stupidity.

 

[bripat9643]

Right-wingers prefer to parrot just plain lies.

The government has no authority to determine which statements are lies. That's what police states do. That's what makes you a fucking NAZI.

 

[bripat9643]

Yelling "Fire" falsely in a crowded theater can get you in trouble with the government.

Broadcasting military secrets publicly or to our adversaries can get you in trouble with the government.

Spreading disinformation about pandemic diseases to an extent that it might bring harm to others can get you in trouble with the government.

There are limits to the First... your opinion on the subject notwithstanding... case law is not on your side in such matters.

The last isn't a legitimate authority of the government. The second claim is also false. It can only get you in trouble if you have obtained the information illegally or signed a non disclosure agreement.

 

[bripat9643]

Correct.

Want to broadcast an opinion that contradicts medical science and which endangers others during a public health emergency and you will be silenced.

The government has no such authority, NAZI. Have you ever read the First Amendment?

Want to broadcast an opinion about anything under the sun OTHER than that during a public health emergency and you're absolutely free to do so.

Says who?

The Constitution and subsequent legislation empowers society to silence the crazies during a public health emergency.

No it doesn't, NAZI

Sux for the crazies... but it works for everyone else... including the dullards who would actually fall for such stupidity.

You mean the founding fathers?

 

[bripat9643]

Your people engaged in Insurrection against the lawful authority of the United States.

They are now going to be made to pay the price for their stupidity.

We all know that "insurrection" meme is utter bullshit.

 

[bripat9643]

Your people engaged in Insurrection against the lawful authority of the United States.

They are now going to be made to pay the price for their stupidity.

no one has been charged with "insurrection," bonehead

 

[Kondor3]

The last isn't a legitimate authority of the government. The second claim is also false. It can only get you in trouble if you have obtained the information illegally or signed a non disclosure agreement.

You live in an alternative reality that has no basis in law nor in fact.

 

[Kondor3]

We all know that "insurrection" meme is utter bullshit.

Nope. It was Insurrection. And now they're gonna pay. Dearly.

 

[Kondor3]

no one has been charged with "insurrection," bonehead

No one has to be charged with insurrection in order to label the event itself as Insurrection.

Its participants are being made to pay, dearly, and the worst of them are going to get crucified in the criminal law courts.

 

[protectionist]

Nope. It was Insurrection. And now they're gonna pay. Dearly.

You ridicule yourself. No one charged in the Jan 6 scenario has had the word "insurrection" as part of their charges. Not mentioned there.

Insurrection is merely a word wildly thrown about by leftist pundits on their brainwash TV shows, and you fall for it.