Joe Biden IS Gutting Our First Amendment (Free Speech)

Don't you think you have been fed enough lies by trump?
Interpret it as you like but the whole thing is about stopping ratbags posting lies about vaccinations and other hate filled bullshit.
Post here an example of what you call a "lie" from Trump. And also alleged "lies" from "ratbags", whoever that is.

And also tell us what you are talking about regarding "hate filled bullshit"

In this forum, we operate on substance. Nobody cares about unsubstantiated hot air.
 
Disagreeing politically is not like yelling fire in a theater. Putting out contrary opinions is not a fire either.
Of course not. These fools don't even have the most basic tools, to engage in a political debate forum.
 
Post here an example of what you call a "lie" from Trump. And also alleged "lies" from "ratbags", whoever that is.

Illdo better than t that smart arse. Here's a few

And also tell us what you are talking about regarding "hate filled bullshit"

As if you don't know the lies you belch about Biden. Your statement is another lie.


In this forum, we operate on substance. Nobody cares about unsubstantiated hot air.

You banging on about a fraudulent election but never produced any evidence yet you call that substance? Quite clearly you don't care about hot air with the frequency you belch it.
Don't try to be clever. You're not smart enough.
 
Disagreeing politically is not like yelling fire in a theater. Putting out contrary opinions is not a fire either.
You would be right if we were talking about silencing communications from someone talking about policies.

You would be wrong if we were talking about silencing communications from someone spreading disinformation about a pandemic disease and its remediation.

You are wrong in this case.
 
But Trump and Republicans being censored by social media fascists, are yelling fire in a crowded theater. They are yelling things we need to hear. Like illegal aliens spreading Covid, inflation, and Americans trapped in Afghanistan due to Biden's blunders.
They are now suffering the consequences of spreading disinformation about a deadly pandemic and its remediation that misleads thousands into fatal illness.

They are now suffering the consequences of inciting Insurrection against the lawful authority of the United States and for the assaulting of Congress.

They should have thought about all this before they shot off their mouths, so that the more righteous aspects of their message still have a easily accessible voice.

Too late now... they can no longer be trusted.
 
You would be right if we were talking about silencing communications from someone talking about policies.

You would be wrong if we were talking about silencing communications from someone spreading disinformation about a pandemic disease and its remediation.

You are wrong in this case.
There are just as many doctors, with just as many degrees, that call bullshit. The media or the government is not qualified to label information.
 
There are just as many doctors, with just as many degrees, that call bullshit. The media or the government is not qualified to label information.
No, there aren't.

For every doctor disagreeing with the lethality and remediation associated with COVID there are hundreds - thousands - with the opposite (and sane) opinion.

We are in the midst of a public health emergency and your oddball freaks trying to kill thousands with their misinformation are simply being silenced.

They can squawk all the like after it's over... for now, they can squeal like little piggies, while the sane world laughs wildly and gleefully at them.
 
No, there aren't.

For every doctor disagreeing with the lethality and remediation associated with COVID there are hundreds - thousands - with the opposite (and sane) opinion.

We are in the midst of a public health emergency and your oddball freaks trying to kill thousands with their misinformation are simply being silenced.

They can squawk all the like after it's over... for now, they can squeal like little piggies, while the sane world laughs wildly and gleefully at them.
Why don't you prove that? You can't because the information is suppressed. You have no idea how many have spoken up because the media and government lie or label what they do not like. Science aint got a thing to do with it.
 
Right wingers are so simple minded. They don’t even understand the basic concept of free speech. Any right wingers willing to let me put up a sign in their yard saying “Republicans are racist simpletons”? No? What about my free speech?
To put it into a proper perspective, you put the stupid sign up in the front yard of a country club you belong to. A Republican city mayor announces that she will "coordinate" with the leadership of all the country clubs in the area to "prevent the spread of misinformation", and your signs are removed every time you put one up. Still okay with it, or are you going to try to find another club and complain about the first one? The salient point is the "coordination" between government and private organizations.
 
Let's take a look at the now becoming famous Politico story that broke the news a few days ago about Biden and the 1st Amendment (free speech). >> “Biden allied groups, including the Democratic National Committee, are also planning to engage fact-checkers more aggressively and work with SMS carriers to dispel misinformation about vaccines that is sent over social media and text messages.”

Jen Psaki, whose job as press secretary is devoted to making the outlandish sound routine, elaborated on the plan Thursday and confirmed it’s already in operation. Within the Surgeon General’s Office, we’re flagging posts for Facebook that spread disinformation,” Psaki said. “We’re working with doctors and medical professionals to connect medical experts with people, who are popular with their audiences, with accurate information and boost trusted content. So, we’re helping get trusted content out there.”

So the government is not only “flagging” people it doesn’t like, it’s also helping to “boost trusted content.”
“It’s important to take faster action against harmful posts,”
Psaki added. “As you all know, information travels quite quickly on social media platforms. Sometimes it’s not accurate, and Facebook needs to move more quickly to remove harmful violative posts.”

Her words,not accurate” and “harmful violative posts,” are so vague as to give the government an open-ended license to push Facebook and other platforms to censor almost anything somebody in the White House doesn’t like.

Sure, this all starts with disagreements over COVID, but why would it end there? Suppose there’s a story about, oh, let’s take a wild stab and say the foreign business interests of the president’s son that also implicate the president.

Might there be any pressure on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and others to block the story from being shared? Does any of this sound familiar? Psaki dug a deeper hole Friday by arguing that people banned from one social media platform should also be banned from others. Her proposal effectively urges the companies to create a unified ban against American citizens.

On top of Biden’s inflammatory accusation, her remarks and the government’s actions make it clear we are far down the slippery slope.

There’s already one example of the potential impacts. The Post’s expose on Hunter Biden’s laptop last October was blocked by Big Tech for two crucial weeks while voting in the presidential election was underway. Later, a poll found most voters were not aware of the stories, and some 8 percent said they would have voted differently had they known the facts. Most folks might not be seeing how huge this all is.

Thanks to Michael Goodwin at the New York Post for supplying this much of this harrowing information.

Right-wingers project the best. Y'all have me banned from more threads than the democrats have y'all banned.
 
To put it into a proper perspective, you put the stupid sign up in the front yard of a country club you belong to. A Republican city mayor announces that she will "coordinate" with the leadership of all the country clubs in the area to "prevent the spread of misinformation", and your signs are removed every time you put one up. Still okay with it, or are you going to try to find another club and complain about the first one? The salient point is the "coordination" between government and private organizations.
Put one up in your own yard. You can’t put your ignorant sign on a country club’s property if they don’t want you to. Duh.
 
You would be right if we were talking about silencing communications from someone talking about policies.

You would be wrong if we were talking about silencing communications from someone spreading disinformation about a pandemic disease and its remediation.

You are wrong in this case.
Not wrong. There is not opinion excluded from the First Amendment.
 
They are now suffering the consequences of spreading disinformation about a deadly pandemic and its remediation that misleads thousands into fatal illness.

They are now suffering the consequences of inciting Insurrection against the lawful authority of the United States and for the assaulting of Congress.

They should have thought about all this before they shot off their mouths, so that the more righteous aspects of their message still have a easily accessible voice.

Too late now... they can no longer be trusted.
There is no "lawful authority" to suppress opinions the government doesn't like.
 
Put one up in your own yard. You can’t put your ignorant sign on a country club’s property if they don’t want you to. Duh.
And if "they don't want you to" is tied directly to Republican city government? Still okay with it?
 

Forum List

Back
Top