Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Actually it is and you fucking know it is. This is how people communicate now----limiting it to the lies that the government tells is certainly a clear violation of free speech. It would be like telling the mail service that they had the right to intercept letters and not deliver them if they didn't like the content either.Limiting your speech on a private platform is not violating your free speech. Just like not allowing you to post everything you want here is not a violation of your free speech.
I live in the reality ruled facts, not by your idiotic goosestepping biases.You live in an alternative reality that has no basis in law nor in fact.
No one has to be charged with insurrection in order to label the event itself as Insurrection.
Its participants are being made to pay, dearly, and the worst of them are going to get crucified in the criminal law courts.
Who has been charged with insurrection?Nope. It was Insurrection. And now they're gonna pay. Dearly.
"Insurrection" describes the Event, not the particulars of the criminal charges filed against suspect A or B.You ridicule yourself. No one charged in the Jan 6 scenario has had the word "insurrection" as part of their charges. Not mentioned there.
Insurrection is merely a word wildly thrown about by leftist pundits on their brainwash TV shows, and you fall for it.
Nope. Only in a free, democratic United States of America, determined to punish those who incited and participated in the Insurrection of January 6, 2021.That's true enough. You can label a jackass a unicorn if you like.
Only in a police state.
Sure you do, son... sure you do...I live in the reality ruled facts, not by your idiotic goosestepping biases.
Insurrection describes liberal media hyperbole, and you fall for it. Ho hum. Yawn***"Insurrection" describes the Event, not the particulars of the criminal charges filed against suspect A or B.
And that's the way History is going to remember you phukkers... Insurrectionists.
typical right-wing projection.So you don't know, you're just making it up.
What do YOU call it when someone insists there are lies but won't list any of them? I call shenanigans.typical right-wing projection.
What do You call it when someone makes up lies and tries to convince everyone it is really the "gospel Truth"?What do YOU call it when someone insists there are lies but won't list any of them? I call shenanigans.
That would be Joe Biden talking.What do You call it when someone makes up lies and tries to convince everyone it is really the "gospel Truth"?
Right-wingers project the Best.That would be Joe Biden talking.
You didn't answer the question. You insisted there were lies. What were they?What do You call it when someone makes up lies and tries to convince everyone it is really the "gospel Truth"?
What isn't a lie coming from the right-wing?You didn't answer the question. You insisted there were lies. What were they?
Let's take a look at the now becoming famous Politico story that broke the news a few days ago about Biden and the 1st Amendment (free speech). >> “Biden allied groups, including the Democratic National Committee, are also planning to engage fact-checkers more aggressively and work with SMS carriers to dispel misinformation about vaccines that is sent over social media and text messages.”
Jen Psaki, whose job as press secretary is devoted to making the outlandish sound routine, elaborated on the plan Thursday and confirmed it’s already in operation. Within the Surgeon General’s Office, we’re flagging posts for Facebook that spread disinformation,” Psaki said. “We’re working with doctors and medical professionals to connect medical experts with people, who are popular with their audiences, with accurate information and boost trusted content. So, we’re helping get trusted content out there.”
So the government is not only “flagging” people it doesn’t like, it’s also helping to “boost trusted content.”
“It’s important to take faster action against harmful posts,” Psaki added. “As you all know, information travels quite quickly on social media platforms. Sometimes it’s not accurate, and Facebook needs to move more quickly to remove harmful violative posts.”
Her words, “not accurate” and “harmful violative posts,” are so vague as to give the government an open-ended license to push Facebook and other platforms to censor almost anything somebody in the White House doesn’t like.
Sure, this all starts with disagreements over COVID, but why would it end there? Suppose there’s a story about, oh, let’s take a wild stab and say the foreign business interests of the president’s son that also implicate the president.
Might there be any pressure on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and others to block the story from being shared? Does any of this sound familiar? Psaki dug a deeper hole Friday by arguing that people banned from one social media platform should also be banned from others. Her proposal effectively urges the companies to create a unified ban against American citizens.
On top of Biden’s inflammatory accusation, her remarks and the government’s actions make it clear we are far down the slippery slope.
There’s already one example of the potential impacts. The Post’s expose on Hunter Biden’s laptop last October was blocked by Big Tech for two crucial weeks while voting in the presidential election was underway. Later, a poll found most voters were not aware of the stories, and some 8 percent said they would have voted differently had they known the facts. Most folks might not be seeing how huge this all is.
Thanks to Michael Goodwin at the New York Post for supplying this much of this harrowing information.
Joe Bidenâs troubling TECHnique: Goodwin
On Friday, Joe Biden accused Facebook of “killing people” and demanded it silence those opposed to or questioning the coronavirus vaccines. Coming from the president, this is a breathtaking accusat…nypost.com
No he's not.....andBiden is our leader, and he can do with the first amendment whatever the fuck he wants...
You're just digging the hole deeper. Every time you reply without pointing out any lies you make it more obvious that you have none and are just making it up.What isn't a lie coming from the right-wing?
lol. Y'all have no "gospel Truth". If it weren't for fallacy, y'all would have no arguments. Every thread I have participated in proves it.You're just digging the hole deeper. Every time you reply without pointing out any lies you make it more obvious that you have none and are just making it up.
And that was your final opportunity to list some lies. Obviously, you have none, you are the weakest link, goodbye.lol. Y'all have no "gospel Truth". If it weren't for fallacy, y'all would have no arguments. Every thread I have participated in proves it.
