Jimmy Kimmel Doubles-Down On 'Stupid'

[2aguy]

50 shot in Chicago, that has some of the strictest gun laws in the US, is a 'good' weekend at times and demonstrates what you have said is very much opinion and not fact.

LOL, I'd explain why Chicago gun laws are irrelevant but you're literally too dumb to grasp what I would tell you.

They are irrelevant because the criminals ignore them.

You people are too stupid to realize that Chicago gun laws regarding purchasing guns does not stop the buyers from going to one of those retarded Red states.

Shit stain......why is it that Chicago has higher gun murder numbers than L.A. and New York combined considering they all have the same gun laws...

Do the gangs in L.A. and New York not know how to leave their state to get guns....? Moron.

Wow, you keep proving how stupid you are.

I have news. Chicago is not a country with borders that enables visitors to be screened.

All it takes is for a seller to travel to one of your retarded, hand out guns to everyone, states & drive them into Chicago,

This is why we need federal laws.

Moron.......again.....why is it that Chicago has a higher number of gun murders than LA and New York combined...do their criminals not know how to use GPS...do Gun traffickers not know where L.A. and New York are.....?

You have no point.....Chicago has a high gun murder rate because they let violent, repeat gun criminals back on the street with less than 3 years time for gun offenses.....and they have hamstrung their police because of democrat policies and giving in to the demands of the ACLU...

Population of cities 2016:

Chicago........2.7 million
L.A................3.9 million
N.Y................8.5 million
Baltimore......620,961
Detroit...........672,795

Murder rate 2016:

Chicago........765
L.A.......... .....293
N.Y................335
Baltimore......318
Detroit...........303

 

[RealDave]

Well, since AS USUAL Easy hasn't provided one single word of evidence to back up his claim (where is the link to the supposed lies Kimmel told the night before, please?) why should ANYTHING Easy says bother me? Easy lies like a rug. I've seen him do it over and over. So if Kimmel lied, show me and quit whining.

The kimmel statement has been taken apart for the last two days...not one thing he said is accurate or truthful......

Not helpful. Let's see it.

Here....this is Ben Shapiro's podcast.....17 minutes where he breaks down kimmel's rant....

Ben Shapirio is an asshole.

He does not give a shit because he refuses to support efforts to help prevent the next one.

If you think we should have people to be able to legally purchase semi-autimatic rifles with 150 round magazines & a device to make them act like an automatic, then you DON'T give a fucking shit.

You are nothing but a low life. NRA duped, POS.

It is people like Shapiro that have blood on their hands from Columbine to Sandy Hook to Vegas.
'
Fuck you Ben Shapiro & the hoard of dumbfucks that actually believe your shit.

Okay, genius.....tell us...what would stop the next one?

150 round magazines....? Really......he could have killed just as many people with 10 round magazines....dumb ass...he was firing from a distance into a packed crowd, with no pressure from law enforcement...it takes less than 2 seconds to change out a magazine or switch to a different rifle....

And the bump fire? He could have killed just as many without it......

Again...what would stop the next one?

Wow, if the bump stock increases the number of bullets being fired, then it is likely it allowed more to be killed.

Just how fucking stupid are you?

The larger the magazine, the more bullets being fired.

If these larger magazines don't help, why the fuck do you want them?

You assholes keep defending the ability of this killer to kill so many by claiming things like assault rifles, large magazines, & bump stock are irrelevant & then fight tooth & nail to be able to buy them'
You stupid fucks are too stupid to get it.

 

[2aguy]

The kimmel statement has been taken apart for the last two days...not one thing he said is accurate or truthful......

Not helpful. Let's see it.

Here....this is Ben Shapiro's podcast.....17 minutes where he breaks down kimmel's rant....

Ben Shapirio is an asshole.

He does not give a shit because he refuses to support efforts to help prevent the next one.

If you think we should have people to be able to legally purchase semi-autimatic rifles with 150 round magazines & a device to make them act like an automatic, then you DON'T give a fucking shit.

You are nothing but a low life. NRA duped, POS.

It is people like Shapiro that have blood on their hands from Columbine to Sandy Hook to Vegas.
'
Fuck you Ben Shapiro & the hoard of dumbfucks that actually believe your shit.

Okay, genius.....tell us...what would stop the next one?

150 round magazines....? Really......he could have killed just as many people with 10 round magazines....dumb ass...he was firing from a distance into a packed crowd, with no pressure from law enforcement...it takes less than 2 seconds to change out a magazine or switch to a different rifle....

And the bump fire? He could have killed just as many without it......

Again...what would stop the next one?

Wow, if the bump stock increases the number of bullets being fired, then it is likely it allowed more to be killed.

Just how fucking stupid are you?

The larger the magazine, the more bullets being fired.

If these larger magazines don't help, why the fuck do you want them?

You assholes keep defending the ability of this killer to kill so many by claiming things like assault rifles, large magazines, & bump stock are irrelevant & then fight tooth & nail to be able to buy them'
You stupid fucks are too stupid to get it.

Real gun people don't want them......they jam very easily. It is morons who know nothing about guns who buy them.

I don't claim magazines are irrelevant...actual research shows magazine capacity is irrelevant to mass public shootings...

Again...this guy was firing into a crowd of thousands of people...........he didn't need the bump stock or large capacity magazines to kill that number of people...it took the police 72 fucking minutes to get to him....moron......

 

[2aguy]

The kimmel statement has been taken apart for the last two days...not one thing he said is accurate or truthful......

Not helpful. Let's see it.

Here....this is Ben Shapiro's podcast.....17 minutes where he breaks down kimmel's rant....

Ben Shapirio is an asshole.

He does not give a shit because he refuses to support efforts to help prevent the next one.

If you think we should have people to be able to legally purchase semi-autimatic rifles with 150 round magazines & a device to make them act like an automatic, then you DON'T give a fucking shit.

You are nothing but a low life. NRA duped, POS.

It is people like Shapiro that have blood on their hands from Columbine to Sandy Hook to Vegas.
'
Fuck you Ben Shapiro & the hoard of dumbfucks that actually believe your shit.

Okay, genius.....tell us...what would stop the next one?

150 round magazines....? Really......he could have killed just as many people with 10 round magazines....dumb ass...he was firing from a distance into a packed crowd, with no pressure from law enforcement...it takes less than 2 seconds to change out a magazine or switch to a different rifle....

And the bump fire? He could have killed just as many without it......

Again...what would stop the next one?

Wow, if the bump stock increases the number of bullets being fired, then it is likely it allowed more to be killed.

Just how fucking stupid are you?

The larger the magazine, the more bullets being fired.

If these larger magazines don't help, why the fuck do you want them?

You assholes keep defending the ability of this killer to kill so many by claiming things like assault rifles, large magazines, & bump stock are irrelevant & then fight tooth & nail to be able to buy them'
You stupid fucks are too stupid to get it.

And it get it....you do the anti-gun bait and switch......you said 150 round magazines...but you want to actually ban 30 round magazines....so you lie about magazine size....

 

[Darkwind]

why is it ...that.

 

[2aguy]

The kimmel statement has been taken apart for the last two days...not one thing he said is accurate or truthful......

Not helpful. Let's see it.

Here....this is Ben Shapiro's podcast.....17 minutes where he breaks down kimmel's rant....

Ben Shapirio is an asshole.

He does not give a shit because he refuses to support efforts to help prevent the next one.

If you think we should have people to be able to legally purchase semi-autimatic rifles with 150 round magazines & a device to make them act like an automatic, then you DON'T give a fucking shit.

You are nothing but a low life. NRA duped, POS.

It is people like Shapiro that have blood on their hands from Columbine to Sandy Hook to Vegas.
'
Fuck you Ben Shapiro & the hoard of dumbfucks that actually believe your shit.

Okay, genius.....tell us...what would stop the next one?

150 round magazines....? Really......he could have killed just as many people with 10 round magazines....dumb ass...he was firing from a distance into a packed crowd, with no pressure from law enforcement...it takes less than 2 seconds to change out a magazine or switch to a different rifle....

And the bump fire? He could have killed just as many without it......

Again...what would stop the next one?

Wow, if the bump stock increases the number of bullets being fired, then it is likely it allowed more to be killed.

Just how fucking stupid are you?

The larger the magazine, the more bullets being fired.

If these larger magazines don't help, why the fuck do you want them?

You assholes keep defending the ability of this killer to kill so many by claiming things like assault rifles, large magazines, & bump stock are irrelevant & then fight tooth & nail to be able to buy them'
You stupid fucks are too stupid to get it.

Here you go....actual research on magazine capacity and mass public shootings...and keep in mind.....magazine capacity was even less relevant because he was firing from a distance and wasn't threatened by close proximity to police or other people...he was in no hurry.......and had 72 minutes before the police found him...

Large-Capacity Magazines and the Casualty Counts in Mass Shootings: The Plausibility of Linkages by Gary Kleck :: SSRN

Do bans on large-capacity magazines (LCMs) for semiautomatic firearms have significant potential for reducing the number of deaths and injuries in mass shootings?
The most common rationale for an effect of LCM use is that they allow mass killers to fire many rounds without reloading.
LCMs are used is less than 1/3 of 1% of mass shootings.
News accounts of 23 shootings in which more than six people were killed or wounded and LCMs were used, occurring in the U.S. in 1994-2013, were examined.
There was only one incident in which the shooter may have been stopped by bystander intervention when he tried to reload.
In all of these 23 incidents the shooter possessed either multiple guns or multiple magazines, meaning that the shooter, even if denied LCMs, could have continued firing without significant interruption by either switching loaded guns or by changing smaller loaded magazines with only a 2-4 second delay for each magazine change.
Finally, the data indicate that mass shooters maintain slow enough rates of fire such that the time needed to reload would not increase the time between shots and thus the time available for prospective victims to escape.

--------

We did not employ the oft-used definition of “mass murder” as a homicide in which four or more victims were killed, because most of these involve just four to six victims (Duwe 2007), which could therefore have involved as few as six rounds fired, a number that shooters using even ordinary revolvers are capable of firing without reloading.

LCMs obviously cannot help shooters who fire no more rounds than could be fired without LCMs, so the inclusion of “nonaffectable” cases with only four to six victims would dilute the sample, reducing the percent of sample incidents in which an LCM might have affected the number of casualties.

Further, had we studied only homicides with four or more dead victims, drawn from the FBI’s Supplementary Homicide Reports, we would have missed cases in which huge numbers of people were shot, and huge numbers of rounds were fired, but three or fewer of the victims died.


For example, in one widely publicized shooting carried out in Los Angeles on February 28, 1997, two bank robbers shot a total of 18 people - surely a mass shooting by any reasonable standard (Table 1).

Yet, because none of the people they shot died, this incident would not qualify as a mass murder (or even murder of any kind).

Exclusion of such incidents would bias the sample against the proposition that LCM use increases the number of victims by excluding incidents with large numbers of victims. We also excluded shootings in which more than six persons were shot over the entire course of the incident but shootings occurred in multiple locations with no more than six people shot in any one of the locations, and substantial periods of time intervened between episodes of shooting. An example is the series of killings committed by Rodrick Dantzler on July 7, 2011.

Once eligible incidents were identified, we searched through news accounts for details related to whether the use of LCMs could have influenced the casualty counts.

Specifically, we searched for

(1) the number of magazines in the shooter’s immediate possession,

(2) the capacity of the largest magazine,

(3) the number of guns in the shooter’s immediate possession during the incident,

(4) the types of guns possessed,

(5) whether the shooter reloaded during the incident,

(6) the number of rounds fired,

(7) the duration of the shooting from the first shot fired to the last, and (8) whether anyone intervened to stop the shooter.

Findings How Many Mass Shootings were Committed Using LCMs?

We identified 23 total incidents in which more than six people were shot at a single time and place in the U.S. from 1994 through 2013 and that were known to involve use of any magazines with capacities over ten rounds.


Table 1 summarizes key details of the LCMinvolved mass shootings relevant to the issues addressed in this paper.

(Table 1 about here) What fraction of all mass shootings involve LCMs?

There is no comprehensive listing of all mass shootings available for the entire 1994-2013 period, but the most extensive one currently available is at the Shootingtracker.com website, which only began its coverage in 2013.

-----

How Often Have Bystanders Intervened While a Mass Shooter Was Trying to Reload?

First, we consider the issue of how many times people have disrupted a mass shooting while the shooter was trying to load a detachable magazine into a semiautomatic gun.

Note that 16 it is irrelevant whether interveners have stopped a shooter while trying to reload some other type of gun, using other kinds of magazines, since we are addressing the potential significance of restrictions on the capacity of detachable magazines which are used only with semiautomatic firearms.

Thus, bystander intervention directed at shooters using other types of guns that take much longer to reload than a semiautomatic gun using detachable magazines could not provide any guidance as to the likelihood of bystander intervention when the shooter was using a semiautomatic gun equipped with detachable magazines that can be reloaded very quickly.

Prospective interveners would presumably be more likely to tackle a shooter who took a long time to reload than one who took only 2-4 seconds to do so.

Likewise, bystander interventions that occurred at a time when the shooter was not reloading (e.g., when he was struggling with a defective gun or magazine) are irrelevant, since that kind of intervention could occur regardless of what kinds of magazines or firearms the shooter was using.


It is the need to reload detachable magazines sooner and more often that differentiates shooters using smaller detachable magazines from those using larger ones.

For the period 1994-2013 inclusive, we identified three mass shooting incidents in which it was claimed that interveners disrupted the shooting by tackling the shooter while he was trying to reload.

In only one of the three cases, however, did interveners actually tackle the shooter while he may have been reloading a semiautomatic firearm.

In one of the incidents, the weapon in question was a shotgun that had to be reloaded by inserting one shotshell at a time into the weapon (Knoxville News Sentinel “Takedown of Alleged Shooter Recounted” July 29, 2008, regarding a shooting in Knoxville, TN on July 27, 2008), and so the incident is irrelevant to the effects of detachable LCMs.


In another incident, occurring in Springfield, Oregon on May 21, 1998, the shooter, Kip Kinkel, was using a semiautomatic gun, and he was tackled by bystanders, but not while he was reloading.

After exhausting the ammunition in one gun, the shooter started 17 firing another loaded gun, one of three firearms he had with him.

The first intervener was shot in the hand in the course of wresting this still-loaded gun away from the shooter (The (Portland) Oregonian, May 23, 1998).


The final case occurred in Tucson, AZ on January 8, 2011.

This is the shooting in which Jared Loughner attempted to assassinate Representative Gabrielle Giffords.

The shooter was using a semiautomatic firearm and was tackled by bystanders, purportedly while trying to reload a detachable magazine.

Even in this case, however, there were important uncertainties.

According to one news account, one bystander “grabbed a full magazine” that the shooter dropped, and two others helped subdue him (Associated Press, January 9, 2011).

It is not, however, clear whether this bystander intervention was facilitated because

(1) the shooter was reloading, or because

(2) the shooter stopping firing when his gun or magazine failed to function properly.

Eyewitness testimony, including that of the interveners, was inconsistent as to exactly why or how the intervention transpired in Giffords shooting.

One intervener insisted that he was sure the shooter had exhausted the ammunition in the first magazine (and thus was about to reload) because he saw the gun’s slide locked back – a condition he believed could only occur with this particular firearm after the last round is fired.

In fact, this can also happen when the guns jams, i.e. fails to chamber the next round (Salzgeber 2014; Morrill 2014).

Complicating matters further, the New York Times reported that the spring on the second magazine was broken, presumably rendering it incapable of functioning.

Their story’s headline and text characterized this mechanical failure as “perhaps the only fortunate event of the day” (New York Times “A Single, Terrifying Moment: Shots, Scuffle, Some Luck,” January 10, 2011, p. A1)

. If the New York Times account was accurate, the shooter would not have been able to continue shooting with that magazine even if no one had stopped him from loading it into his gun.

Detachable magazines of any size can malfunction, which would at least temporarily stop a prospective mass shooter from firing, and thereby provide an opportunity for bystanders to stop the shooter.
It is possible that the bystander intervention in the Tucson case could have occurred regardless of what size magazines the shooter possessed, since a shooter struggling with a defective small-capacity magazine would be just as vulnerable to disruption as one struggling with a defective large-capacity magazine. Thus, it remains unclear whether the shooter was reloading when the bystanders tackled him.
-----
The offenders in LCM-involved mass shootings were also known to have reloaded during 14 of the 23 (61%) incidents with magazine holding over 10 rounds.

The shooters were known to have not reloaded in another two of these 20 incidents and it could not be determined if they reloaded in the remaining seven incidents.

Thus, even if the shooters had been denied LCMs, we know that most of them definitely would have been able to reload smaller detachable magazines without interference from bystanders since they in fact did change magazines.

The fact that this percentage is less than 100% should not, however, be interpreted to mean that the shooters were unable to reload in the other nine incidents.

It is possible that the shooters could also have reloaded in many of these nine shootings, but chose not to do so, or did not need to do so in order to fire all the rounds they wanted to fire. This is consistent with the fact that there has been at most only one mass shootings in twenty years in which reloading a semiautomatic firearm might have been blocked by bystanders intervening and thereby stopping the shooter from doing all the shooting he wanted to do. All we know is that in two incidents the shooter did not reload, and news accounts of seven other incidents did not mention whether the offender reloaded.

----

For example, a story in the Hartford Courant about the Sandy Hook elementary school killings in 2012 was headlined “Shooter Paused, and Six Escaped,” the text asserting that as many as six children may have survived because the shooter paused to reload (December 23, 2012). ''

The author of the story, however, went on to concede that this was just a speculation by an unnamed source, and that it was also possible that some children simply escaped when the killer was shooting other children.

There was no reliable evidence that the pauses were due to the shooter reloading, rather than his guns jamming or the shooter simply choosing to pause his shooting while his gun was still loaded.

The plausibility of the “victims escape” rationale depends on the average rates of fire that shooters in mass shootings typically maintain.

If they fire very fast, the 2-4 seconds it takes to change box-type detachable magazines could produce a slowing of the rate of fire that the shooters otherwise would have maintained without the magazine changes, increasing the average time between rounds fired and potentially allowing more victims to escape during the betweenshot intervals.

On the other hand, if mass shooters fire their guns with the average interval between shots lasting more than 2-4 seconds, the pauses due to additional magazine changes would be no longer than the pauses the shooter typically took between shots even when not reloading.

In that case, there would be no more opportunity for potential victims to escape than there would have been without the additional magazine changes

-----

In sum, in nearly all LCM-involved mass shootings, the time it takes to reload a detachable magazine is no greater than the average time between shots that the shooter takes anyway when not reloading.

Consequently, there is no affirmative evidence that reloading detachable magazines slows mass shooters’ rates of fire, and thus no affirmative evidence that the number of victims who could escape the killers due to additional pauses in the shooting is increased by the shooter’s need to change magazines.

 

[IsaacNewton]

He rightfully lays the responsibility for these massacres where it belongs, at the feet of the gun cult in the US. The NRA, the gun manufacturers, the Republican Party. The NRA ignores the wishes of it's own members who overwhelmingly support things like detailed background checks and keeping guns out of the hands of mentally ill people.

But the gun cult derives money and political power from keeping these weapons in the hands of the very people that shouldn't have them. And the cult constructs ever more elaborate lies to keep the money flowing. The latest is 'silencers on guns protect children's hearing'. So up until now all the children of gun owners have been deaf?

It is a cult of just disgusting human beings.

You left out "a basket of irredeemable deplorable's!"

You poor saps have it bad for HRC and that just has stuck in your craw hasn't it. I forgot it long ago and don't care but it is forever swirling around your head.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Mental illness questions for a gun purchase:
1) do you think that Kimmel, Fallon, Colbert, Meyers, Maher, John Oliver, Trevor Noah.....are funny
2) do you trust Hillary
3) do you think that Global Warming is caused by Mankind
4) do think that someone who is against hate and racism would go to Rev Wright's church for 20 years
5) do you think that OJ was framed by the LA PD
6) do you get your News from dumb left wing late night TV talk show hosts
7) do you think that Islamic Terrorist are the victims of prejudice
8) do you think that asking for an ID to vote is racism
9) do you think that taking a knee during the national anthem is patriotic
10) does Nancy Pelosi make sense to you

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Stephen Paddock seems like an average Jimmy Kimmel fan

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Stephen Paddock's murder victims seem like the kinds of Mainstream Americans that dumb liberal bigots like Jimmy Kimmel hate so much

 

[francoHFW]

He had 14 guns with bump stocks made it all possible. Ban them duh.

 

[RealDave]

Not helpful. Let's see it.

Here....this is Ben Shapiro's podcast.....17 minutes where he breaks down kimmel's rant....

Ben Shapirio is an asshole.

He does not give a shit because he refuses to support efforts to help prevent the next one.

If you think we should have people to be able to legally purchase semi-autimatic rifles with 150 round magazines & a device to make them act like an automatic, then you DON'T give a fucking shit.

You are nothing but a low life. NRA duped, POS.

It is people like Shapiro that have blood on their hands from Columbine to Sandy Hook to Vegas.
'
Fuck you Ben Shapiro & the hoard of dumbfucks that actually believe your shit.

Okay, genius.....tell us...what would stop the next one?

150 round magazines....? Really......he could have killed just as many people with 10 round magazines....dumb ass...he was firing from a distance into a packed crowd, with no pressure from law enforcement...it takes less than 2 seconds to change out a magazine or switch to a different rifle....

And the bump fire? He could have killed just as many without it......

Again...what would stop the next one?

Wow, if the bump stock increases the number of bullets being fired, then it is likely it allowed more to be killed.

Just how fucking stupid are you?

The larger the magazine, the more bullets being fired.

If these larger magazines don't help, why the fuck do you want them?

You assholes keep defending the ability of this killer to kill so many by claiming things like assault rifles, large magazines, & bump stock are irrelevant & then fight tooth & nail to be able to buy them'
You stupid fucks are too stupid to get it.

Real gun people don't want them......they jam very easily. It is morons who know nothing about guns who buy them.

I don't claim magazines are irrelevant...actual research shows magazine capacity is irrelevant to mass public shootings...

Again...this guy was firing into a crowd of thousands of people...........he didn't need the bump stock or large capacity magazines to kill that number of people...it took the police 72 fucking minutes to get to him....moron......

He quit shooting long before that. Hotel security had engaged him within 20 minutes.

To pretend that assault type semi automatic weapons with large magazines & a bump stock don't increase the killing power is just plain stupid. This is why most people consider you gun nuts a bunch of dumbasses.

 

[RealDave]

He rightfully lays the responsibility for these massacres where it belongs, at the feet of the gun cult in the US. The NRA, the gun manufacturers, the Republican Party. The NRA ignores the wishes of it's own members who overwhelmingly support things like detailed background checks and keeping guns out of the hands of mentally ill people.

But the gun cult derives money and political power from keeping these weapons in the hands of the very people that shouldn't have them. And the cult constructs ever more elaborate lies to keep the money flowing. The latest is 'silencers on guns protect children's hearing'. So up until now all the children of gun owners have been deaf?

It is a cult of just disgusting human beings.

You left out "a basket of irredeemable deplorable's!"

You poor saps have it bad for HRC and that just has stuck in your craw hasn't it. I forgot it long ago and don't care but it is forever swirling around your head.

It has nothing to do with Clintyon.

It has to do with ignorant asshole you elected. It proves just how fucking stupid a bunch of Americans really are.

 

[2aguy]

Here....this is Ben Shapiro's podcast.....17 minutes where he breaks down kimmel's rant....

Ben Shapirio is an asshole.

He does not give a shit because he refuses to support efforts to help prevent the next one.

If you think we should have people to be able to legally purchase semi-autimatic rifles with 150 round magazines & a device to make them act like an automatic, then you DON'T give a fucking shit.

You are nothing but a low life. NRA duped, POS.

It is people like Shapiro that have blood on their hands from Columbine to Sandy Hook to Vegas.
'
Fuck you Ben Shapiro & the hoard of dumbfucks that actually believe your shit.

Okay, genius.....tell us...what would stop the next one?

150 round magazines....? Really......he could have killed just as many people with 10 round magazines....dumb ass...he was firing from a distance into a packed crowd, with no pressure from law enforcement...it takes less than 2 seconds to change out a magazine or switch to a different rifle....

And the bump fire? He could have killed just as many without it......

Again...what would stop the next one?

Wow, if the bump stock increases the number of bullets being fired, then it is likely it allowed more to be killed.

Just how fucking stupid are you?

The larger the magazine, the more bullets being fired.

If these larger magazines don't help, why the fuck do you want them?

You assholes keep defending the ability of this killer to kill so many by claiming things like assault rifles, large magazines, & bump stock are irrelevant & then fight tooth & nail to be able to buy them'
You stupid fucks are too stupid to get it.

Real gun people don't want them......they jam very easily. It is morons who know nothing about guns who buy them.

I don't claim magazines are irrelevant...actual research shows magazine capacity is irrelevant to mass public shootings...

Again...this guy was firing into a crowd of thousands of people...........he didn't need the bump stock or large capacity magazines to kill that number of people...it took the police 72 fucking minutes to get to him....moron......

He quit shooting long before that. Hotel security had engaged him within 20 minutes.

To pretend that assault type semi automatic weapons with large magazines & a bump stock don't increase the killing power is just plain stupid. This is why most people consider you gun nuts a bunch of dumbasses.

No....I didn't say that....I said at that range the bump stock didn't make a difference.....and in fact, had he fired without it, the crowd wouldn't have realized they were under attack as soon.

And no...security didn't engage him.....they don't have guns....and the police took 72 minutes to breach the room...they had to clear the floor going to his room.....

And again.....he could have used 10 round magazines and killed just as many people....

 

[2aguy]

He had 14 guns with bump stocks made it all possible. Ban them duh.

No...moron.......he was shooting at a distance and they actually made it easier for people to know they were being shot at.....and then they all ran...had he fired without it, he could have killed even more.....

 

[francoHFW]

He had 14 guns with bump stocks made it all possible. Ban them duh.

No...moron.......he was shooting at a distance and they actually made it easier for people to know they were being shot at.....and then they all ran...had he fired without it, he could have killed even more.....

No s*** head, he was just spraying them not aiming because his rifle was like an automatic.

 

[edthecynic]

After being called out for his disastrously-flawed Late Night Monologue rant about guns / gun legislation, Kimmel doubled down on his ignorance and emotion-fueled rhetoric, telling 'gun nuts' that they are partially to blame for refusing to allow Liberals to strip them of their 2nd Amendment rights, which would not have prevented the Vegas attack and would not prevent future attacks.

Jimmy Kimmel Doubles Down on Gun 'Nuts': 'You Bear Some Responsibility'

"Late-night host Jimmy Kimmel continued to attack gun rights advocates during Tuesday night’s monologue of Jimmy Kimmel Live!, defending the deceptive gun control rant he issued in tears one night earlier and mocked gun “nuts” who called him out on it.

The greater criticism for Kimmel rests on the nature of his Monday night comments; his misleading and, in some cases, blatantly false claims about gun laws, certain types of firearms, and Second Amendment legislation pending before Congress.

The comic offered no apology for his deception during his Tuesday night monologue, nor did he rectify his failure to cry over those killed in gun-controlled Chicago — nearly 59 people each month — the way he cried over those killed in gun-friendly Nevada. Instead, he doubled down appealing to his First Amendment right to say what he said and mocking those who called him out on it."

Yesterday several media outlets reported that Kimmel had received help writing his monologue from D-Schumer, who provided Kimmel with some gun 'facts' and figures. Well, that explains, in part, why his Monologue rant was so flawed and factually inaccurate...

/----/ From Rush's website: Chart of the day: More guns, less gun violence between 1993 and 2013 - AEI
You want to hear another little fact? AEI, American Enterprise Institute, has a chart here that records American gun ownership and the American murder rate with guns since 1994. Since 1994, gun ownership has increased. Privately owned firearms has increased by 56%. The gun homicide rate has declined since 1994 by 49%, meaning more guns does not mean more murder. More guns has meant less murder. Again, since 1994 the number of privately owned firearms has gone up 56%. I don’t have total numbers here, but it doesn’t matter for the purposes of this. In that same period sense 1994, gun homicide rate annually has declined 49%, it’s almost equal.

Feel free to not own a gun.

Is that all you can say when your MessiahRushie is caught lying???

 

[edthecynic]

After being called out for his disastrously-flawed Late Night Monologue rant about guns / gun legislation, Kimmel doubled down on his ignorance and emotion-fueled rhetoric, telling 'gun nuts' that they are partially to blame for refusing to allow Liberals to strip them of their 2nd Amendment rights, which would not have prevented the Vegas attack and would not prevent future attacks.

Jimmy Kimmel Doubles Down on Gun 'Nuts': 'You Bear Some Responsibility'

"Late-night host Jimmy Kimmel continued to attack gun rights advocates during Tuesday night’s monologue of Jimmy Kimmel Live!, defending the deceptive gun control rant he issued in tears one night earlier and mocked gun “nuts” who called him out on it.

The greater criticism for Kimmel rests on the nature of his Monday night comments; his misleading and, in some cases, blatantly false claims about gun laws, certain types of firearms, and Second Amendment legislation pending before Congress.

The comic offered no apology for his deception during his Tuesday night monologue, nor did he rectify his failure to cry over those killed in gun-controlled Chicago — nearly 59 people each month — the way he cried over those killed in gun-friendly Nevada. Instead, he doubled down appealing to his First Amendment right to say what he said and mocking those who called him out on it."

Yesterday several media outlets reported that Kimmel had received help writing his monologue from D-Schumer, who provided Kimmel with some gun 'facts' and figures. Well, that explains, in part, why his Monologue rant was so flawed and factually inaccurate...

/----/ From Rush's website: Chart of the day: More guns, less gun violence between 1993 and 2013 - AEI
You want to hear another little fact? AEI, American Enterprise Institute, has a chart here that records American gun ownership and the American murder rate with guns since 1994. Since 1994, gun ownership has increased. Privately owned firearms has increased by 56%. The gun homicide rate has declined since 1994 by 49%, meaning more guns does not mean more murder. More guns has meant less murder. Again, since 1994 the number of privately owned firearms has gone up 56%. I don’t have total numbers here, but it doesn’t matter for the purposes of this. In that same period sense 1994, gun homicide rate annually has declined 49%, it’s almost equal.

Gun ownership is not falling, that is a lie. Gun owners are not answering polling questions about gun ownership....we went from 200 million guns in the 1990s to close to 600 million guns in 2017......and it isn't the same two guys in Idaho buying them.

So gun owners are lying about their address in their background checks and getting away with it, according to you.

 

[edthecynic]

He isn't telling the truth....not one thing he said was the truth. Doesn't that bother you?

Fact-checking Jimmy Kimmel, late-night hosts about Las Vegas

 

[edthecynic]

The kimmel statement has been taken apart for the last two days...not one thing he said is accurate or truthful......

LIAR!
Fact-checking Jimmy Kimmel, late-night hosts about Las Vegas