Jimmy Kimmel Doubles-Down On 'Stupid'

[Zander]

**** Jimmy Kimmel.

He only cries for ratings.

He's a hypocrite.

He has the right to express his opinion, and your desire to censor him is evidence you are not a real American.

Where in my post did I say I want to censor him?

He is free to cry the entire hour of his show.

Doesn't bother me a bit.

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

He has the right to express his opinion, and your desire to censor him is evidence you are not a real American.

Like he has a right to tell stupid jokes which are carefully avoided though.

 

[Zander]

Kimmel is paid to be an attention whore.

He earned his pay this week.

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

I used to really like him on "Win Ben Stein's Money" and can't believe what he has become.

 

[Zander]

I used to really like him on "Win Ben Stein's Money" and can't believe what he has become.

The "Man Show" was kinda funny.

.

 

[RealDave]

After being called out for his disastrously-flawed Late Night Monologue rant about guns / gun legislation, Kimmel doubled down on his ignorance and emotion-fueled rhetoric, telling 'gun nuts' that they are partially to blame for refusing to allow Liberals to strip them of their 2nd Amendment rights, which would not have prevented the Vegas attack and would not prevent future attacks.

Jimmy Kimmel Doubles Down on Gun 'Nuts': 'You Bear Some Responsibility'

"Late-night host Jimmy Kimmel continued to attack gun rights advocates during Tuesday night’s monologue of Jimmy Kimmel Live!, defending the deceptive gun control rant he issued in tears one night earlier and mocked gun “nuts” who called him out on it.

The greater criticism for Kimmel rests on the nature of his Monday night comments; his misleading and, in some cases, blatantly false claims about gun laws, certain types of firearms, and Second Amendment legislation pending before Congress.

The comic offered no apology for his deception during his Tuesday night monologue, nor did he rectify his failure to cry over those killed in gun-controlled Chicago — nearly 59 people each month — the way he cried over those killed in gun-friendly Nevada. Instead, he doubled down appealing to his First Amendment right to say what he said and mocking those who called him out on it."

Yesterday several media outlets reported that Kimmel had received help writing his monologue from D-Schumer, who provided Kimmel with some gun 'facts' and figures. Well, that explains, in part, why his Monologue rant was so flawed and factually inaccurate...

/----/ From Rush's website: Chart of the day: More guns, less gun violence between 1993 and 2013 - AEI
You want to hear another little fact? AEI, American Enterprise Institute, has a chart here that records American gun ownership and the American murder rate with guns since 1994. Since 1994, gun ownership has increased. Privately owned firearms has increased by 56%. The gun homicide rate has declined since 1994 by 49%, meaning more guns does not mean more murder. More guns has meant less murder. Again, since 1994 the number of privately owned firearms has gone up 56%. I don’t have total numbers here, but it doesn’t matter for the purposes of this. In that same period sense 1994, gun homicide rate annually has declined 49%, it’s almost equal.

Citing Rush Limbaugh? Just how ******* stupid can you get.

There are lots of factors in the lowering of the crime rate. But hey, Rush knows evertything.....everything to takes to dupe the ignorant.

With fewer guns, the rate might have dropped more.

The average global temperature rose during that period therefore global warming is reducing the crime rate. Autos averaged a higher MPG .... OMG OMG Higher fuel efficiencies reduced the crime rate!

/—-/ Hey moron, Rush simply cited the study, he didn’t create it. You can’t refute the data so you attack the messenger and reject the studyout of hand. How liberal of you.

The NRA ignores the wishes of it's own members who overwhelmingly support things like detailed background checks and keeping guns out of the hands of mentally ill people.

None of which would have stopped Paddock, but let's not allow reality to get in the way of your feelings.

Feelings rule you. What is it with people that find some anecdotal thing that supports what they believe and they immediately extrapolate it out into infinity. "Well if this one thing happened then all things happen". Reality doesn't work like that. "Well we have laws against stealing but one person still stole something so no laws against stealing work".

By this reasoning no laws are of any value so why have them.

An Ad Absurdum argument that is ridiculous. All of human existence is about minimizing damage. Many people that wear seatbelts die in car crashes. We still require seatbelts because they save many lives. People die running red lights and stop signs, nobody then argues red lights and stop signs should be done away with because in one instance or even a thousand people ignored the law or such devices were less than 100% effective.

To argue such a thing is the realm of the lazy, those people that have no real grasp on something but find one instance of an exception and then apply it across the board in all circumstances. Real life is far messier and muddier than that but the lazy look for the easiest path that requires the least amount of thought.

/—-/ How many laws did Paddock violate? How would another 200 laws stop him?

It is his analysis dumbass.

 

[RealDave]

Perhaps the Hollywood types should lead by example and give up their armed private security. I’m sure there security people are responsible people who know how to handle a firearm and have no intention of going on a killing spree as are the millions of other law abiding gun owners across the country. If mister Kimmel or anyone else in Hollywood has an actual workable idea on how to stop things like Las Vegas let’s hear it if not please shut up.

Trained security is different.

 

[2aguy]

He rightfully lays the responsibility for these massacres where it belongs, at the feet of the gun cult in the US. The NRA, the gun manufacturers, the Republican Party. The NRA ignores the wishes of it's own members who overwhelmingly support things like detailed background checks and keeping guns out of the hands of mentally ill people.

But the gun cult derives money and political power from keeping these weapons in the hands of the very people that shouldn't have them. And the cult constructs ever more elaborate lies to keep the money flowing. The latest is 'silencers on guns protect children's hearing'. So up until now all the children of gun owners have been deaf?

It is a cult of just disgusting human beings.

Dumb ass......this guy passed over 4o background checks...one for each gun.......and he bought the guns from regular gun stores, not through private sales......

Even with universal background checks for private sales....moron.....this guy would have passed those....because he passed all the other federally mandated background checks for all the guns he bought....

Please......I know you are stupid....but try not to show everyone that you are really, really, stupid....

 

[Zander]

After being called out for his disastrously-flawed Late Night Monologue rant about guns / gun legislation, Kimmel doubled down on his ignorance and emotion-fueled rhetoric, telling 'gun nuts' that they are partially to blame for refusing to allow Liberals to strip them of their 2nd Amendment rights, which would not have prevented the Vegas attack and would not prevent future attacks.

Jimmy Kimmel Doubles Down on Gun 'Nuts': 'You Bear Some Responsibility'

"Late-night host Jimmy Kimmel continued to attack gun rights advocates during Tuesday night’s monologue of Jimmy Kimmel Live!, defending the deceptive gun control rant he issued in tears one night earlier and mocked gun “nuts” who called him out on it.

The greater criticism for Kimmel rests on the nature of his Monday night comments; his misleading and, in some cases, blatantly false claims about gun laws, certain types of firearms, and Second Amendment legislation pending before Congress.

The comic offered no apology for his deception during his Tuesday night monologue, nor did he rectify his failure to cry over those killed in gun-controlled Chicago — nearly 59 people each month — the way he cried over those killed in gun-friendly Nevada. Instead, he doubled down appealing to his First Amendment right to say what he said and mocking those who called him out on it."

Yesterday several media outlets reported that Kimmel had received help writing his monologue from D-Schumer, who provided Kimmel with some gun 'facts' and figures. Well, that explains, in part, why his Monologue rant was so flawed and factually inaccurate...

/----/ From Rush's website: Chart of the day: More guns, less gun violence between 1993 and 2013 - AEI
You want to hear another little fact? AEI, American Enterprise Institute, has a chart here that records American gun ownership and the American murder rate with guns since 1994. Since 1994, gun ownership has increased. Privately owned firearms has increased by 56%. The gun homicide rate has declined since 1994 by 49%, meaning more guns does not mean more murder. More guns has meant less murder. Again, since 1994 the number of privately owned firearms has gone up 56%. I don’t have total numbers here, but it doesn’t matter for the purposes of this. In that same period sense 1994, gun homicide rate annually has declined 49%, it’s almost equal.

Feel free to not own a gun.

 

[RealDave]

LOL Yours is a fixed mentality that rejects facts in favor or your feelings on the matter.

You mean like the FACT that not one new gun law / proposed piece of gun legislation from the Left would have stopped the Vegas shooting or any such shooting in the future? You mean like THOSE FACTS?

That statement is dumber than shit.

You can't state a hypothetical situation is a fact.

My God.

The truth is that if these guns were indeed banned & the sales loopholes closed, this man may not have had these guns. If he had pursued then illegally, he might have been caught.

 

[2aguy]

After being called out for his disastrously-flawed Late Night Monologue rant about guns / gun legislation, Kimmel doubled down on his ignorance and emotion-fueled rhetoric, telling 'gun nuts' that they are partially to blame for refusing to allow Liberals to strip them of their 2nd Amendment rights, which would not have prevented the Vegas attack and would not prevent future attacks.

Jimmy Kimmel Doubles Down on Gun 'Nuts': 'You Bear Some Responsibility'

"Late-night host Jimmy Kimmel continued to attack gun rights advocates during Tuesday night’s monologue of Jimmy Kimmel Live!, defending the deceptive gun control rant he issued in tears one night earlier and mocked gun “nuts” who called him out on it.

The greater criticism for Kimmel rests on the nature of his Monday night comments; his misleading and, in some cases, blatantly false claims about gun laws, certain types of firearms, and Second Amendment legislation pending before Congress.

The comic offered no apology for his deception during his Tuesday night monologue, nor did he rectify his failure to cry over those killed in gun-controlled Chicago — nearly 59 people each month — the way he cried over those killed in gun-friendly Nevada. Instead, he doubled down appealing to his First Amendment right to say what he said and mocking those who called him out on it."

Yesterday several media outlets reported that Kimmel had received help writing his monologue from D-Schumer, who provided Kimmel with some gun 'facts' and figures. Well, that explains, in part, why his Monologue rant was so flawed and factually inaccurate...

/----/ From Rush's website: Chart of the day: More guns, less gun violence between 1993 and 2013 - AEI
You want to hear another little fact? AEI, American Enterprise Institute, has a chart here that records American gun ownership and the American murder rate with guns since 1994. Since 1994, gun ownership has increased. Privately owned firearms has increased by 56%. The gun homicide rate has declined since 1994 by 49%, meaning more guns does not mean more murder. More guns has meant less murder. Again, since 1994 the number of privately owned firearms has gone up 56%. I don’t have total numbers here, but it doesn’t matter for the purposes of this. In that same period sense 1994, gun homicide rate annually has declined 49%, it’s almost equal.

Gun ownership is not falling, that is a lie. Gun owners are not answering polling questions about gun ownership....we went from 200 million guns in the 1990s to close to 600 million guns in 2017......and it isn't the same two guys in Idaho buying them.

 

[2aguy]

LOL Yours is a fixed mentality that rejects facts in favor or your feelings on the matter.

You mean like the FACT that not one new gun law / proposed piece of gun legislation from the Left would have stopped the Vegas shooting or any such shooting in the future? You mean like THOSE FACTS?

That statement is dumber than shit.

You can't state a hypothetical situation is a fact.

My God.

The truth is that if these guns were indeed banned & the sales loopholes closed, this man may not have had these guns. If he had pursued then illegally, he might have been caught.

There are no loopholes. He passed federal background checks for every single gun.....that means.....stupid ass....that he would pass any background check done for a private sale..........

Why are you guys so stupid?

 

[Cellblock2429]

After being called out for his disastrously-flawed Late Night Monologue rant about guns / gun legislation, Kimmel doubled down on his ignorance and emotion-fueled rhetoric, telling 'gun nuts' that they are partially to blame for refusing to allow Liberals to strip them of their 2nd Amendment rights, which would not have prevented the Vegas attack and would not prevent future attacks.

Jimmy Kimmel Doubles Down on Gun 'Nuts': 'You Bear Some Responsibility'

"Late-night host Jimmy Kimmel continued to attack gun rights advocates during Tuesday night’s monologue of Jimmy Kimmel Live!, defending the deceptive gun control rant he issued in tears one night earlier and mocked gun “nuts” who called him out on it.

The greater criticism for Kimmel rests on the nature of his Monday night comments; his misleading and, in some cases, blatantly false claims about gun laws, certain types of firearms, and Second Amendment legislation pending before Congress.

The comic offered no apology for his deception during his Tuesday night monologue, nor did he rectify his failure to cry over those killed in gun-controlled Chicago — nearly 59 people each month — the way he cried over those killed in gun-friendly Nevada. Instead, he doubled down appealing to his First Amendment right to say what he said and mocking those who called him out on it."

Yesterday several media outlets reported that Kimmel had received help writing his monologue from D-Schumer, who provided Kimmel with some gun 'facts' and figures. Well, that explains, in part, why his Monologue rant was so flawed and factually inaccurate...

/----/ From Rush's website: Chart of the day: More guns, less gun violence between 1993 and 2013 - AEI
You want to hear another little fact? AEI, American Enterprise Institute, has a chart here that records American gun ownership and the American murder rate with guns since 1994. Since 1994, gun ownership has increased. Privately owned firearms has increased by 56%. The gun homicide rate has declined since 1994 by 49%, meaning more guns does not mean more murder. More guns has meant less murder. Again, since 1994 the number of privately owned firearms has gone up 56%. I don’t have total numbers here, but it doesn’t matter for the purposes of this. In that same period sense 1994, gun homicide rate annually has declined 49%, it’s almost equal.

Citing Rush Limbaugh? Just how ******* stupid can you get.

There are lots of factors in the lowering of the crime rate. But hey, Rush knows evertything.....everything to takes to dupe the ignorant.

With fewer guns, the rate might have dropped more.

The average global temperature rose during that period therefore global warming is reducing the crime rate. Autos averaged a higher MPG .... OMG OMG Higher fuel efficiencies reduced the crime rate!

/—-/ Hey moron, Rush simply cited the study, he didn’t create it. You can’t refute the data so you attack the messenger and reject the studyout of hand. How liberal of you.

The NRA ignores the wishes of it's own members who overwhelmingly support things like detailed background checks and keeping guns out of the hands of mentally ill people.

None of which would have stopped Paddock, but let's not allow reality to get in the way of your feelings.

Feelings rule you. What is it with people that find some anecdotal thing that supports what they believe and they immediately extrapolate it out into infinity. "Well if this one thing happened then all things happen". Reality doesn't work like that. "Well we have laws against stealing but one person still stole something so no laws against stealing work".

By this reasoning no laws are of any value so why have them.

An Ad Absurdum argument that is ridiculous. All of human existence is about minimizing damage. Many people that wear seatbelts die in car crashes. We still require seatbelts because they save many lives. People die running red lights and stop signs, nobody then argues red lights and stop signs should be done away with because in one instance or even a thousand people ignored the law or such devices were less than 100% effective.

To argue such a thing is the realm of the lazy, those people that have no real grasp on something but find one instance of an exception and then apply it across the board in all circumstances. Real life is far messier and muddier than that but the lazy look for the easiest path that requires the least amount of thought.

/—-/ How many laws did Paddock violate? How would another 200 laws stop him?

It is his analysis dumbass.

/—/ So in your analysis what is wrong with the article?

 

[OldLady]

After being called out for his disastrously-flawed Late Night Monologue rant about guns / gun legislation, Kimmel doubled down on his ignorance and emotion-fueled rhetoric, telling 'gun nuts' that they are partially to blame for refusing to allow Liberals to strip them of their 2nd Amendment rights, which would not have prevented the Vegas attack and would not prevent future attacks.

Jimmy Kimmel Doubles Down on Gun 'Nuts': 'You Bear Some Responsibility'

"Late-night host Jimmy Kimmel continued to attack gun rights advocates during Tuesday night’s monologue of Jimmy Kimmel Live!, defending the deceptive gun control rant he issued in tears one night earlier and mocked gun “nuts” who called him out on it.

The greater criticism for Kimmel rests on the nature of his Monday night comments; his misleading and, in some cases, blatantly false claims about gun laws, certain types of firearms, and Second Amendment legislation pending before Congress.

The comic offered no apology for his deception during his Tuesday night monologue, nor did he rectify his failure to cry over those killed in gun-controlled Chicago — nearly 59 people each month — the way he cried over those killed in gun-friendly Nevada. Instead, he doubled down appealing to his First Amendment right to say what he said and mocking those who called him out on it."

Yesterday several media outlets reported that Kimmel had received help writing his monologue from D-Schumer, who provided Kimmel with some gun 'facts' and figures. Well, that explains, in part, why his Monologue rant was so flawed and factually inaccurate...

Good for Jimmy. A lot more people need to do a lot more standing up and telling the truth. This cannot continue.

 

[2aguy]

After being called out for his disastrously-flawed Late Night Monologue rant about guns / gun legislation, Kimmel doubled down on his ignorance and emotion-fueled rhetoric, telling 'gun nuts' that they are partially to blame for refusing to allow Liberals to strip them of their 2nd Amendment rights, which would not have prevented the Vegas attack and would not prevent future attacks.

Jimmy Kimmel Doubles Down on Gun 'Nuts': 'You Bear Some Responsibility'

"Late-night host Jimmy Kimmel continued to attack gun rights advocates during Tuesday night’s monologue of Jimmy Kimmel Live!, defending the deceptive gun control rant he issued in tears one night earlier and mocked gun “nuts” who called him out on it.

The greater criticism for Kimmel rests on the nature of his Monday night comments; his misleading and, in some cases, blatantly false claims about gun laws, certain types of firearms, and Second Amendment legislation pending before Congress.

The comic offered no apology for his deception during his Tuesday night monologue, nor did he rectify his failure to cry over those killed in gun-controlled Chicago — nearly 59 people each month — the way he cried over those killed in gun-friendly Nevada. Instead, he doubled down appealing to his First Amendment right to say what he said and mocking those who called him out on it."

Yesterday several media outlets reported that Kimmel had received help writing his monologue from D-Schumer, who provided Kimmel with some gun 'facts' and figures. Well, that explains, in part, why his Monologue rant was so flawed and factually inaccurate...

Good for Jimmy. A lot more people need to do a lot more standing up and telling the truth. This cannot continue.

He isn't telling the truth....not one thing he said was the truth. Doesn't that bother you?

 

[OldLady]

You don't understand people who have empathy. That is characteristic of someone with a personality disorder.

Oh I understand people who have empathy. What I do not understand is why liberals like Kimmel have to LIE their assess off to push their agenda and then double down on their BS after being called out for it.

I understand empathy, but I don't understand liberals who would make comments like how they feel no sympathy / empathy with the victims because they were at a country music concert and most Republicans are country music enthusiasts...

I understand empathy, but I don't understand people like you who immediately rush to liars / political would-be manipulators like Kimmel in an attempt to justify / defend their intentionally false statements.

THAT is the true characteristic of someone who is immoral, unethical, and / or extremely partisan.

You're doing it again, Easy--taking that one lowdown misanthrope and turning her into multiple liberals. Jimmy isn't lying and it makes no logical sense to compare him to her. I'm gonna find that broad brush of yours and break it over my knee. Cut it out.

 

[blackhawk]

Perhaps the Hollywood types should lead by example and give up their armed private security. I’m sure there security people are responsible people who know how to handle a firearm and have no intention of going on a killing spree as are the millions of other law abiding gun owners across the country. If mister Kimmel or anyone else in Hollywood has an actual workable idea on how to stop things like Las Vegas let’s hear it if not please shut up.

Trained security is different.

No kidding but if millions of people across the country don’t need a gun than Kimmel and his Hollywood friends don’t need private security either.

 

[OldLady]

After being called out for his disastrously-flawed Late Night Monologue rant about guns / gun legislation, Kimmel doubled down on his ignorance and emotion-fueled rhetoric, telling 'gun nuts' that they are partially to blame for refusing to allow Liberals to strip them of their 2nd Amendment rights, which would not have prevented the Vegas attack and would not prevent future attacks.

Jimmy Kimmel Doubles Down on Gun 'Nuts': 'You Bear Some Responsibility'

"Late-night host Jimmy Kimmel continued to attack gun rights advocates during Tuesday night’s monologue of Jimmy Kimmel Live!, defending the deceptive gun control rant he issued in tears one night earlier and mocked gun “nuts” who called him out on it.

The greater criticism for Kimmel rests on the nature of his Monday night comments; his misleading and, in some cases, blatantly false claims about gun laws, certain types of firearms, and Second Amendment legislation pending before Congress.

The comic offered no apology for his deception during his Tuesday night monologue, nor did he rectify his failure to cry over those killed in gun-controlled Chicago — nearly 59 people each month — the way he cried over those killed in gun-friendly Nevada. Instead, he doubled down appealing to his First Amendment right to say what he said and mocking those who called him out on it."

Yesterday several media outlets reported that Kimmel had received help writing his monologue from D-Schumer, who provided Kimmel with some gun 'facts' and figures. Well, that explains, in part, why his Monologue rant was so flawed and factually inaccurate...

Good for Jimmy. A lot more people need to do a lot more standing up and telling the truth. This cannot continue.

He isn't telling the truth....not one thing he said was the truth. Doesn't that bother you?

Well, since AS USUAL Easy hasn't provided one single word of evidence to back up his claim (where is the link to the supposed lies Kimmel told the night before, please?) why should ANYTHING Easy says bother me? Easy lies like a rug. I've seen him do it over and over. So if Kimmel lied, show me and quit whining.

 

[2aguy]

The NRA ignores the wishes of it's own members who overwhelmingly support things like detailed background checks and keeping guns out of the hands of mentally ill people.

None of which would have stopped Paddock, but let's not allow reality to get in the way of your feelings.

Nope, but it would save at least 59 other people who are murdered daily by guns they shouldn't be in possession of.

Background checks do not stop criminals from getting guns....they don't stop mass shooters from getting guns....this guy in Vegas passed at least 40 background checks to get his guns...one for each purchase........and those are the mandated Federal background checks...which means he would have passed any "detailed background check" too....do you understand that?


The Pulse nightclub shooter.....he passed a "detailed background check" for his job as a security officer, he passed a background check for every single gun he purchased, he passed 3 interviews with trained FBI interrogators, and a year long in depth background check and even an undercover approach by an FBI agent....

Background checks do not stop mass shooters because the only crime they commit is the mass shooting...

Do you understand this?

 

[2aguy]

The NRA ignores the wishes of it's own members who overwhelmingly support things like detailed background checks and keeping guns out of the hands of mentally ill people.

None of which would have stopped Paddock, but let's not allow reality to get in the way of your feelings.

Nope, but it would save at least 59 other people who are murdered daily by guns they shouldn't be in possession of.

The NRA enables terrorists and violent criminals, and the NRA KNOWS IT!

Wow....did you stay up all night copying that from all the other anti-gun morons repeating it as if it has any value or relation to the truth?