Jill Biden Thinks It's Un-American To Oppose Porn in School Libraries

Once Republicans started to falsely accuse educators and librarians of "grooming" children for sexual abuse, it was just a matter of time before the talk of imprisoning them began. Sure enough, in a clip collected by Tennessee Holler, a recently-elected district attorney in Hamilton County, Tennessee, did just that during a meet-and-greet between her, the pro-censorship group Moms for Liberty (whose name would do George Orwell proud) and the local sheriff. In the video, recorded in May, you can hear an anti-liberty "Mom" ask, "Do you feel like there should be some kind of prosecution for these librarians?"

Coty Wamp, the county's new DA, offers a throat-clearing "tough one," before affirming that prosecution is on the table: "There's going to come a time, in some of these books, where it crosses a criminal line. It's called contributing to the delinquency of a minor."

Now that the video has gone viral, Wamp is denying that she intended to say what she said. When contacted by Jezebel, she unleashed a confusing disawowal, claiming she never meant to say she would "prosecute librarians or teachers for the books that are in our schools," but was only talking about some imaginary scenario in which "an adult was standing on a street corner handing out pamphlets to young children that depict sexual acts." As the video shows, of course, she was responding to a question about librarians, at an event held by a group whose main political activity is harassing librarians and schoolteachers over books with "woke" content they don't like.

Indeed, in that same Jezebel interview, Wamp hedged again, in a way that sounds very much as if she has not ruled out prosecuting librarians and teachers for allowing kids to read book with content that offends the racist or homophobic sensibilities of Republicans:

For me as a lawyer and somebody that's prosecuted these cases you also have to determine who at the end of the day is responsible for putting these books in these schools. Is it the librarian? Is it the school administrators? Is it the school board? Because if we're going to talk about who's on the hook, whose on the hook for this, who is on the hook? We have to talk about it.

Clearly, the Republican war on reading in just beginning. Ever since GOP hedge-fund zillionaire Glenn Youngkin won the 2021 race for Virginia's governor with a campaign that celebrated attempts to censor Nobel-winning novelist Toni Morrison, Republicans across the country have been swept up in a book-banning frenzy. Using fake concerns about "the children" as cover, Republicans have waged all-out war on not just books but any form of speech deemed "woke," usually because it advocates antiracism or humanizes LGBTQ people. Red states have been banning books and terrorizing teachers for anything they deem "critical race theory," now a shapeless umbrella term used to demonizes everything from teaching Martin Luther King Jr.'s March on Washington to telling kids that the Holocaust was bad. Hoary myths that gay people "recruit" children have been revived by simply updating the terminology — these days, LGBTQ people are accused of "grooming" children, with no evidence required — and used to justify legislation such as Florida's "don't say gay" law, effectively forcing queer teachers and students into the closet. The circle of censorship is expanding, as conservatives have started to target drag shows and Pride parades, trying to shut down any public expression of queerness or gender diversity.


(full article online)

 
I’ve fake news headline. Nothing more than empty clickbait
Yes, it is clickbait. No one is “banning” any books. Just because a book is not going to be allowed in a children’s school library doesn’t constitute a “ban” on the book. It’s simply not going to be used at that school.

So don’t worry, you can still buy all the homosexual books you want.
 
Mostly because her family had all sorts of sexual contact with one another
 
Thank you Religious Extremist Republicans

George M. Johnson’s young-adult memoir “All Boys Aren’t Blue,” about growing up Black and queer, appeared on The New York Times bestseller list this month for the first time since its publication nearly two years ago. The spike in sales was undoubtedly fueled by the publicity the title received after being banned in public libraries and schools in at least 19 states, according to Johnson’s count.

Johnson’s book was joined on the Times’ young adult hardcover bestseller list by two other widely challenged books — 2017’s “The Hate U Give” and 2020’s “Stamp” — which made the American Library Association’s 2020 list of Top 10 most challenged books. But while banned book lists drive sales for some LGBTQ authors and authors of color, others say challenges and bans to their titles simply make them quietly disappear.


“People were seeing me on list after list and congratulating me and being like, ‘Oh, my God, you must be so happy. This must be such a badge of honor. Your sales must be so great,’” author Mark Oshiro said of banned and challenged book lists. “That’s not how it actually works.”

When Oshiro, who uses gender-neutral pronouns, heard one of their books, “Each of Us a Desert,” a fantasy novel about two girls falling in love on a quest through the desert, was on Texas Rep. Matt Krause’s list of 850 books to be pulled from Texas schools, they didn’t realize how much attention this particular list would get. After all, their books had been on many such lists before. But even with all the publicity surrounding the Krause list — which included titles the lawmaker said could "make students feel uncomfortable" — because Oshiro's book was just one of hundreds, they didn’t see a spike in sales, despite the many calls online to buy the banned books in support.


 
I don't believe books should be banned. I also do not think students should be punished for not reading certain books for principled reasons.
 
“When a book finds itself at the top of a national news story because it has received a challenge, sales go up,” said Kristen McLean, books industry analyst for NPD. “But that doesn’t translate into an overall sales boost for other banned books. It’s the immediacy of the story, and viewers’ reaction to it, that drives increased sales. It is also likely that many consumers don’t know what books have been widely banned beyond the current title at the top of the press coverage.”

The following books were among those that have recently made national headlines after being challenged or banned, resulting in significant sales spikes as the story was amplified by the press:

  • Noted by the American Library Association as having the most challenges in the U.S., “Gender Queer: A Memoir,” by Maia Kolbabe, experienced significant growth after the controversy surrounding the book was covered in newspapers in May. With total U.S. print book sales volume of 25,000 units, sales spiked by 1,900 units (130% over prior week) for the week ending May 7, 2022.
  • After it was banned by a Tennessee school board in February 2022, sales of the Pulitzer Prize-winning “Maus I” and “Maus II”, by Art Spiegelman, jumped 34,200 units (50% higher than the prior week). Sales for the combined titles have reached 1.2 million units since NPD BookScan began tracking books in 2004.
  • Sales of “Antiracist Baby,” by Ibram X. Kendi, increased by 14,500 units during the week ending April 2, 2022, after Texas Senator Ted Cruz criticized it during a Supreme Court hearing. Total lifetime book sales have reached 303,000.
  • “All Boys Aren’t Blue,” by George M. Johnson, sales increased by 1,900 units, during the week ending February 12, 2022. The book, which has sold more than 37,000 copies overall, had been banned in public libraries in eight states.



 
The obscenity laws in Texas as well as some other states shields against prosecution for providing sexually explicit content to minors or distributing material that depicts children engaged in sex acts, if the materials are considered "educational" by the school. Therein lies the problem. Any teacher or school official can choose whatever books for their students or libraries, regardless of the fact they promote sexual acts, perversion, satanism, demonology, or whatever.

You can't blame the parents for being concerned about the materials are being made available to their children, because the teachers, administrators, school boards, and local officials aren't doing anything about the parent's concerns. While it's true that teachers and schools teach children, it's ultimately parents who should have the last word in how and what their children are being taught.
 
I don't believe books should be banned. I also do not think students should be punished for not reading certain books for principled reasons.
Well send that memo to university students who ban conservatives from addressing student organizations on campus.
And the same goes for Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, et al. banning any message they do not like about a host of social and political topics.
- - - - - - (They do not like them because the truth puts a dagger in their agendas.)
 

Forum List

Back
Top