Jill Biden Thinks It's Un-American To Oppose Porn in School Libraries


Schools nationwide contain inappropriate and sometimes pornographic materials in their libraries, often under the guise of “inclusivity.” Thankfully, states like Florida are empowering parents to have more input over materials and curricula, and parents are starting to fight back against subversive and obscene materials being made available to their children.

And First Lady Jill Biden doesn’t like it one bit. In an interview with NBC News correspondent Sheinelle Jones, she argued that parents shouldn’t be able to exclude any books from school libraries.

“Parents and politicians are now weighing in on what books should be in our school libraries, and what their kids are being taught,” Jones began “Where’s the line, in your opinion, with how much of a say parents have when it comes to what their kids are learning in school? Is there a balance between, you know, ‘This book should be in the library, this book is under review—”


Wow. Quite the fake Catholic mom. Another filthy degenerate Biden.

[This is where some Republicans got the "Democrats are Pedophiles " idea, and love to repeat it and believe it.]

A mid-level QAnon personality who often accuses top Democrats of being pedophiles is himself a convicted child molester.

David Todeschini, 70, runs a medium-sized channel on Bitchute, an alternative video sharing site like YouTube, called Net4TruthUSA.

In several of his videos, Todeschini has said Democrats are pedophiles. In the title of one recent video, Todeschini wrote that President Joe Biden was a "cho-mo," which is prison slang for pedophile.

QAnon followers claim that there is a "deep state" of senior Democratic Party politicos, CEOs, and celebrities that run a sex cult involving children. There is no evidence for this theory.

However, records show that Todeschini is in fact a pedophile. In 1990, he was convicted of coercing an 8-year-old boy into sexual acts in 1987, as noted on the New York state sex offenders register.

The news was first reported by Right Wing Watch.

Todeschini, who is known in QAnon circles as David Trent, is classed as a level three threat by New York state, meaning he has a "high risk of repeat offense and a threat to public safety exists."

He was released from prison in 2006 and said in a recent video that he now lives in North Carolina.

His Bitchute channel has more than 21,000 followers and some of his videos have amassed over 100,000 views.

Todeschini has previously had a number of his YouTube channels removed, according to Right Wing Watch.

Todeschini told Vice News in a recent interview that he also believes in the Frazzledrip conspiracy. Adherents believe that a video exists of Hillary Clinton torturing and drinking the blood of a young girl.

Todeschini has said that he was in Washington, DC, at the time of the January 6 riot at the Capitol, though it is unclear whether he entered the Capitol itself.


 
Interesting that someone says porn isn't good for children and you have this reaction.
He is trying to equate illustrated books showing very young children how anal and oral sex with grown men is fun with the New Testament. He says no difference.
 
Well send that memo to university students who ban conservatives from addressing student organizations on campus.

OK, point them out and I would be happy to.


And the same goes for Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, et al. banning any message they do not like about a host of social and political topics.
- - - - - - (They do not like them because the truth puts a dagger in their agendas.)

No, it is not the same. It's not any of my business what a private company or group does. My initial statement doesn't apply to a private Christian school either.
 
He is trying to equate illustrated books showing very young children how anal and oral sex with grown men is fun with the New Testament. He says no difference.
No such thing. But you can revel in your religious ignorance all you like.
 
No, your lies are simply ridiculous, as is your continuous whining that groomer material is finally being caught out and removed from public and school libraries.
This garbage about groomers started with this guy:

 
I don't care even the tiniest bit about whether those books are in a library or not.
Really? Because you seemed rather animated earlier for someone who doesn't give a shit.

"Piece of shit social conservatives have always been the backbone of book banning movements"
 
Really? Because you seemed rather animated earlier for someone who doesn't give a shit.

"Piece of shit social conservatives have always been the backbone of book banning movements"

Murphy isn't the only Republican with this censorious impulse. The American Library Association maintains an incomplete list of attempted book-banning events in recent history, and in the large majority of cases for which a motivation is explained, it is conservative: Right-wing parents in Columbus, Ohio, tried to ban Catcher in the Rye in schools in 1963 because it was "anti-white." Other parents challenged The Grapes of Wrath in Greenville, South Carolina, in 1991 because it invoked God and Jesus in a "vain and profane manner." Slaughterhouse-Five was suppressed in Oakland County, Michigan, in 1972, in a case in which a circuit judge called the book "depraved, immoral, psychotic, vulgar, and anti-Christian." Those are just three of dozens of examples.

Now, liberals have done the same thing on occasion, typically targeting books which contain racial slurs, like The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. But the bulk of book banning incidents — parents complaining about sexual content, violence, skepticism of Christianity, cursing, or the history of racism and slavery — are straight out of the Moral Majority politics of the 1980s and 1990s. That habit seemed to vanish for awhile when Republicans nominated a thrice-divorced, credibly accused rapist for president. Now it's coming back.

In recent months, Republican legislatures have passed de facto prohibitions of teaching the history of racism across the country. As a result, a Tennessee teacher was fired for assigning Ta-Nehisi Coates, while a Texas school board recently apologized for instructing teachers to present "opposing" views on the Holocaust while trying to obey a Republican law on curriculum content. Don't let the brief reprieve fool you: They were always like this.




 
This garbage about groomers started with this guy:

Save it, liberals have long ago proven who they are, what they intend, and the evidence is being put on full display right here, with the filth they want in our public and school libraries. You found one degenerate and now wish to discredit all the evidence of exactly what is really happening. That's pathetic.
 
OK, point them out and I would be happy to.

There are many cases of this the past few years.
Berkeley College Republicans file lawsuit to force Cal to let Ann Coulter speak

No, it is not the same. It's not any of my business what a private company or group does. My initial statement doesn't apply to a private Christian school either.
Fine. Then I demand those Big Tech Social networks no longer receive government protection from law suits under Section 230. Newspapers and TV networks are not given this protection, they are responsible for the content that is printed or airs. But Facebook, Twitter, et al. is protected. That is because they were under the assumption of a free flow of information, not censorship, ---- except in cases of pornography, terrorism, or the like.
 
No such thing. But you can revel in your religious ignorance all you like.
The pro-fascist element will inevitably fall back on religious extremism to make their point.

And as religious bigotry becomes more extreme in certain parts of America, so does racism.

Both are tightly bound to fascist ideals.
 
Piece of shit social conservatives have always been the backbone of book banning movements

You do realize no conservatives want to ban books right? You can buy and read any book you want.

What they want is to not have certain books and material in schools for children. When those kids grow up they or go home after school they can read anything they want.
 
No such thing. But you can revel in your religious ignorance all you like.
Lawn Boy, Gender Queer, Dream House, illustrated porn directed to very young children.
 

I support allowing whoever to speak but it seems the college may have a legitimate argument in keeping certain people off campus.


  • And the same extremists on the far right and far left who got into fist fights on April 15 are planning to return to Berkeley on Thursday. At least two right-wing groups have launched fund-raising campaigns to do so.
Fine. Then I demand those Big Tech Social networks no longer receive government protection from law suits under Section 230. Newspapers and TV networks are not given this protection, they are responsible for the content that is printed or airs. But Facebook, Twitter, et al. is protected. That is because they were under the assumption of a free flow of information, not censorship, ---- except in cases of pornography, terrorism, or the like.

A site like this should not be held responsible for what we post. If they are *Poof* they are all gone.
 

Forum List

Back
Top