Just goes to show you need at least 1 superpower covering your arse. Nazi Germany took on all of modern industrialised Europe and it took 3 superpowers to beat her in almost 6 years of constant warfare. Zionist Isreal, in comparison, has had to mobilise to anything approaching that level only 4 times in 70 years and waged aggressive war on three of those occasions against disorganised and/or unprepared enemies. The rest of the time Israel has had to contend against an oppressed and fractured indigenous people, armed with a tiny, tiny, fraction of the weaponry Zionist Isreal possesses, defending it's right to exist. The fact they're still there fighting, after 70 years is a "victory" in itself.
Throw around as many insults as you like, it changes nothing, just demonstrates the fact you know deep down that I'm right, and that frightens you and your ilk.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
LOL
The Arab League that ATTACKED ISRAEL to begin with was a force from the entire Middle East.
In the 1967 War Egypt and Syria were massed on their borders and outnumbered the Israeli's 4 to one provided for them by the Russians................
and in 1971 Egypt started the attack again armed with Russian Equipment, and again outnumbering the Israeli's...............
On all occasions the Israeli's were outnumbered and Won the day. Not only did they win, in the last Two, but they kicked the living hell out of them with fewer numbers.
Your distortion of history is typical.
I find the "distorting of history" accusation amusing coming from someone who clearly toes the Zionist Hasbara line. Zionists have distorted history for decades until in a moment of hubris, complacency or just incompetance, the Government released
all the 1948 archives to the public, allowing Historians to finally be able to get at the truth. It's no accident, they've not done so for the 1956, 1967, or 1973 wars.
The truth then:
The neighbouring Arab forces invaded Palestine in 1948 ostensibly to prevent further ethnic cleansing by the Zionists. Abdullah of Jordan, had already made a deal with the Zionists to occupy Jerusalem and the Palestinian area subsequently known as the West Bank. Syria and Iraq invaded the northernmost area of the West bank more to prevent the Jordanians achieving their aims, than any intent to destroy the newly declared state. Lebanon was sympathetic to the Zionists at the time and only made a token gesture of "attacking" before subsequently pulling back and taking no further part in any operations. Syrian and Egyptian forces did cross into areas that the Zionists declared sovereignty over, but lacked the equipment and ammunition (not to mention training and experience) needed to have any effect. If I recall correctly, the Syrians were held back by two home made artillery pieces and the egyptians were stopped by battle hardened Jewish veterans of Stalingrad, defending one of their settlements. The egyptian force contained various contingents of "volunteers" from other Muslim countries but they were less than useless and more a burden than a help to the Egyptians.
The Arabs were under an arms embargo and were unable to resupply their forces, never having expected to have to actually go to war. The Zionists, while under the same embargo, had been preparing for war for years beforehand and basically ignored the embargo, import modern weapons and equipment via the Soviets and their satellite regimes in Eastern Europe after the british had left. In 1948 the Zionist forces outnumbered the combined arab forces in theatre, and once properly equipped, were easily able to launch an aggressive war of conquest.
I don't have time now to debunk the other conflicts but really, you need to read some objective and scholarly works and not just regurgitate Zionist hasbara historiography. Oh, did you mean 1973, when you wrote 1971?
