Jews for Justice..... If Americans really Knew

[nat4900]

Absolutely, like the great return of the monarch butterflies to their ancestral homeland.

Monarch butterflies decline migration may disappear

MEXICO CITY (AP) — The number of Monarch butterflies wintering in Mexico plunged this year to its lowest level since studies began in 1993, leading experts to announce Wednesday that the insects' annual migration from the United States and Canada is in danger of disappearing.

 

[rhodescholar]

Monarch butterflies decline migration may disappear

MEXICO CITY (AP) — The number of Monarch butterflies wintering in Mexico plunged this year to its lowest level since studies began in 1993, leading experts to announce Wednesday that the insects' annual migration from the United States and Canada is in danger of disappearing.

Too bad for the arabs the jews won't disappear like all of the other dozens, if not hundreds, of civilizations the arabs have destroyed over the past 1,400 years, or are ethnically cleansing out of the mideast currently. Just ask the coptics, maronites, yazidis, bahai, azeri, chaldeans, maneachans, and so many others.

 

[nat4900]

Too bad for the arabs the jews won't disappear like all of the other dozens, if not hundreds, of civilizations the arabs have destroyed over the past 1,400 years, or are ethnically cleansing out of the mideast currently. Just ask the coptics, maronites, yazidis, bahai, azeri, chaldeans, maneachans, and so many others.

Whether you know it or not, you're funny and entertaining. Thank You.

 

[theliq]

Monarch butterflies decline migration may disappear

MEXICO CITY (AP) — The number of Monarch butterflies wintering in Mexico plunged this year to its lowest level since studies began in 1993, leading experts to announce Wednesday that the insects' annual migration from the United States and Canada is in danger of disappearing.

Too bad for the arabs the jews won't disappear like all of the other dozens, if not hundreds, of civilizations the arabs have destroyed over the past 1,400 years, or are ethnically cleansing out of the mideast currently. Just ask the coptics, maronites, yazidis, bahai, azeri, chaldeans, maneachans, and so many others.

YOU FORGOT TO MENTION ALL THE CIVILIZATIONS THE JEWS WIPED OFF THE FACE OF THE EARTH......THE MOABITES,THE CANAANITES,THE PHILISINES,THEY TRIED THE PALESTINIANS>>>BUT FAILED.

By the way the civilizations YOU MENTIONED....still have thriving communities to day.....which makes your argument pretty Flacid.

I note that you pro Jewish lobby hardly ever mention what the GERMANS,CATHOLICS ETC., DID TO THE JEWS............??????WHY IS THAT...Please Explain.

theliq

 

[theliq]

Too bad for the arabs the jews won't disappear like all of the other dozens, if not hundreds, of civilizations the arabs have destroyed over the past 1,400 years, or are ethnically cleansing out of the mideast currently. Just ask the coptics, maronites, yazidis, bahai, azeri, chaldeans, maneachans, and so many others.

Whether you know it or not, you're funny and entertaining. Thank You.

He's not funny but he is a JOKE..steve

 

[theliq]

The war is ongoing, or hadn't you noticed? Winners and losers are normally determined at the end of hostilities. The Brits never won against the Germans in WW2 from 1939-1942 remember?

Hmm, so you think I do not notice things eh? You are funny. And your example of the Brits and the Germans spans a mere 3 years. You are really funny. Especially since the Germans did lose.

And since you haven't noticed, let me remind you. The partition plan gave some to the Arabs and some to Israel, but the Arabs went to war. At the end of the hostilities, Israel had more than the original plan. 1967. At the end of the hostilities Israel had even more; the whole of Gaza, the whole of the West Bank and even the whole of the Sinai. And a nice chunk taken away from Syria in the Golan heights. Yom Kipper war in 1973. Hmm, let me see. Nope. Nothing lost there at the end of the hostilities either.

And even since, Israel gave back Gaza and the Sinai.

The Zionist Israelis are indeed currently "winning", just like the Nazi Germans from 1939-42. The partition plan would have given 43% of the best land in Palestine to the minority immigrant Zionist colonists, while the native Palestinians would have been left with land mostly unfit for agriculture. The plan was fundamentaly unfair and yet you wonder why the natives opposed it. The native Arabs went to war to stop the Zionist ethnic cleansing and the hostilities never ended. In 1967 the Zionists waged an aggressive war to steal yet more territory and the war went on. Remember Nazi Germany conquered most of Europe and a huge chunk of the USSR at one point, but eventually lost it all. The war is not over yet.

Well there is the same ARROGANCE with the ZIONIST SCURGE,as there was with the NAZIS...and the Zionists try to desensitize people about the FINE PALESTINIANS,in the same way the NAZIS did to the Jews......Please note I have NOT paired Jews and ZIONIST TRASH as they are both very different types of people....Say NO TO ZIONISM.

I'm changing the "Teddyearp" monika to TEADDY TWERP because he is a Rabid Zionista........steve...and talks Shit most of the time

Of course I can. But my question is, why do you insist on making a fool of yourself? It's as if you just can't help it.

Anglo-Iraqi Treaty - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

A treaty is not administrative control you idiot, and it was not ratified for 2 years.

from your link

The treaty was signed on behalf of the British by Sir Percy Cox on October 10, 1922. However, it was not ratified by the Iraqi government until 1924. It was only when the British High Commissioner threatened to wield his authority to scrap the constitution, drafted by the Iraqi constituent assembly, that the treaty was finally ratified. It was seen with disdain by many of the people of the new Kingdom, both Sunni and Shia. While it was the first step towards complete independence from the imperial powers, it created a country which was not accepted by all those who found themselves within it.


And it seems that it was much like the Palestinian problem with outsiders coming in and taking the indigenous peoples land

The State of Israel HAS NEVER BEEN RATIFIED BY THE US SECURITY COUNCIL>>>>>>>THUS DEEMING ISRAEL ILLEGAL......FACT....YOU ARE BUT ILLEGAL SQUATTERS.....FACT.I'm theliq,all knowing LIQ...ever living,ever faithful,ever sure.

 

[Challenger]

It says no such thing. Phoney's trolling again.

MANDATE FOR PALESTINE which became International law invites the Jews to migrate.

Want to argue with the ICJ on that matter ?


And by the way you are the one TROLLING and will be reported every time for it.

Show me the actual invitation to migrate. I'll even give you a link. The Avalon Project The Palestine Mandate

Why cant you read and understand 1922 English


ART. 6.
The Administration of Palestine, while ensuring that the rights and position of other sections of the population are not prejudiced, shall facilitate Jewish immigration under suitable conditions and shall encourage, in co-operation with the Jewish agency referred to in Article 4, close settlement by Jews on the land, including State lands and waste lands not required for public purposes.



ART. 7.
The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

Not a sign of any invitation to migrate in either article. Try again.

So saying SHALL facilitate Jewish immigration. Is not inviting the Jews to migrate.

Try going for remedial English lessons

Facilitate means "put no obstacle in the way of" or "make it easier" there is no implied invitation, although Zionists prefer to interpret the word as an invitation as it gives them a fig leaf of legitimacy. From Balfour until the rise of the Nazis a paltry 300-400,000 assorted Jewish Zionists migrated to Palestine, out of a total world Jewish population of 15,000,000, that's roughly 0.03% of the world's Jewish population. 99.97% apparently never got an "invitation", or if they did, declined the offer.

 

[Linkiloo]

Monarch butterflies decline migration may disappear

MEXICO CITY (AP) — The number of Monarch butterflies wintering in Mexico plunged this year to its lowest level since studies began in 1993, leading experts to announce Wednesday that the insects' annual migration from the United States and Canada is in danger of disappearing.

Too bad for the arabs the jews won't disappear like all of the other dozens, if not hundreds, of civilizations the arabs have destroyed over the past 1,400 years, or are ethnically cleansing out of the mideast currently. Just ask the coptics, maronites, yazidis, bahai, azeri, chaldeans, maneachans, and so many others.

YOU FORGOT TO MENTION ALL THE CIVILIZATIONS THE JEWS WIPED OFF THE FACE OF THE EARTH......THE MOABITES,THE CANAANITES,THE PHILISINES,THEY TRIED THE PALESTINIANS>>>BUT FAILED.

By the way the civilizations YOU MENTIONED....still have thriving communities to day.....which makes your argument pretty Flacid.

I note that you pro Jewish lobby hardly ever mention what the GERMANS,CATHOLICS ETC., DID TO THE JEWS............??????WHY IS THAT...Please Explain.

theliq

If they "tried" to wipe out the palestinians, they failed miserably considering that the Palestinian population is exploding. In fact there are no parallels between the Nazis and the Israelis and any claim that there are, only serves to cheapen the murderous acts of the nazis. Please keep things in persepctive. No doubt Israel has made some bad decisions, but then so have the palestinian leadership.

 

[Linkiloo]

The war is ongoing, or hadn't you noticed? Winners and losers are normally determined at the end of hostilities. The Brits never won against the Germans in WW2 from 1939-1942 remember?

Hmm, so you think I do not notice things eh? You are funny. And your example of the Brits and the Germans spans a mere 3 years. You are really funny. Especially since the Germans did lose.

And since you haven't noticed, let me remind you. The partition plan gave some to the Arabs and some to Israel, but the Arabs went to war. At the end of the hostilities, Israel had more than the original plan. 1967. At the end of the hostilities Israel had even more; the whole of Gaza, the whole of the West Bank and even the whole of the Sinai. And a nice chunk taken away from Syria in the Golan heights. Yom Kipper war in 1973. Hmm, let me see. Nope. Nothing lost there at the end of the hostilities either.

And even since, Israel gave back Gaza and the Sinai.

The Zionist Israelis are indeed currently "winning", just like the Nazi Germans from 1939-42. The partition plan would have given 43% of the best land in Palestine to the minority immigrant Zionist colonists, while the native Palestinians would have been left with land mostly unfit for agriculture. The plan was fundamentaly unfair and yet you wonder why the natives opposed it. The native Arabs went to war to stop the Zionist ethnic cleansing and the hostilities never ended. In 1967 the Zionists waged an aggressive war to steal yet more territory and the war went on. Remember Nazi Germany conquered most of Europe and a huge chunk of the USSR at one point, but eventually lost it all. The war is not over yet.

Well there is the same ARROGANCE with the ZIONIST SCURGE,as there was with the NAZIS...and the Zionists try to desensitize people about the FINE PALESTINIANS,in the same way the NAZIS did to the Jews......Please note I have NOT paired Jews and ZIONIST TRASH as they are both very different types of people....Say NO TO ZIONISM.

I'm changing the "Teddyearp" monika to TEADDY TWERP because he is a Rabid Zionista........steve...and talks Shit most of the time

Of course I can. But my question is, why do you insist on making a fool of yourself? It's as if you just can't help it.

Anglo-Iraqi Treaty - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

A treaty is not administrative control you idiot, and it was not ratified for 2 years.

from your link

The treaty was signed on behalf of the British by Sir Percy Cox on October 10, 1922. However, it was not ratified by the Iraqi government until 1924. It was only when the British High Commissioner threatened to wield his authority to scrap the constitution, drafted by the Iraqi constituent assembly, that the treaty was finally ratified. It was seen with disdain by many of the people of the new Kingdom, both Sunni and Shia. While it was the first step towards complete independence from the imperial powers, it created a country which was not accepted by all those who found themselves within it.


And it seems that it was much like the Palestinian problem with outsiders coming in and taking the indigenous peoples land

The State of Israel HAS NEVER BEEN RATIFIED BY THE US SECURITY COUNCIL>>>>>>>THUS DEEMING ISRAEL ILLEGAL......FACT....YOU ARE BUT ILLEGAL SQUATTERS.....FACT.I'm theliq,all knowing LIQ...ever living,ever faithful,ever sure.

Who is the zionist scurge or trash, which you write in capitals? I believe in Israel's right to exist. Does that make me zionist trash?

 

[Challenger]

The war is ongoing, or hadn't you noticed? Winners and losers are normally determined at the end of hostilities. The Brits never won against the Germans in WW2 from 1939-1942 remember?

Hmm, so you think I do not notice things eh? You are funny. And your example of the Brits and the Germans spans a mere 3 years. You are really funny. Especially since the Germans did lose.

And since you haven't noticed, let me remind you. The partition plan gave some to the Arabs and some to Israel, but the Arabs went to war. At the end of the hostilities, Israel had more than the original plan. 1967. At the end of the hostilities Israel had even more; the whole of Gaza, the whole of the West Bank and even the whole of the Sinai. And a nice chunk taken away from Syria in the Golan heights. Yom Kipper war in 1973. Hmm, let me see. Nope. Nothing lost there at the end of the hostilities either.

And even since, Israel gave back Gaza and the Sinai.

The Zionist Israelis are indeed currently "winning", just like the Nazi Germans from 1939-42. The partition plan would have given 43% of the best land in Palestine to the minority immigrant Zionist colonists, while the native Palestinians would have been left with land mostly unfit for agriculture. The plan was fundamentaly unfair and yet you wonder why the natives opposed it. The native Arabs went to war to stop the Zionist ethnic cleansing and the hostilities never ended. In 1967 the Zionists waged an aggressive war to steal yet more territory and the war went on. Remember Nazi Germany conquered most of Europe and a huge chunk of the USSR at one point, but eventually lost it all. The war is not over yet.

Well there is the same ARROGANCE with the ZIONIST SCURGE,as there was with the NAZIS...and the Zionists try to desensitize people about the FINE PALESTINIANS,in the same way the NAZIS did to the Jews......Please note I have NOT paired Jews and ZIONIST TRASH as they are both very different types of people....Say NO TO ZIONISM.

I'm changing the "Teddyearp" monika to TEADDY TWERP because he is a Rabid Zionista........steve...and talks Shit most of the time

Of course I can. But my question is, why do you insist on making a fool of yourself? It's as if you just can't help it.

Anglo-Iraqi Treaty - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

A treaty is not administrative control you idiot, and it was not ratified for 2 years.

from your link

The treaty was signed on behalf of the British by Sir Percy Cox on October 10, 1922. However, it was not ratified by the Iraqi government until 1924. It was only when the British High Commissioner threatened to wield his authority to scrap the constitution, drafted by the Iraqi constituent assembly, that the treaty was finally ratified. It was seen with disdain by many of the people of the new Kingdom, both Sunni and Shia. While it was the first step towards complete independence from the imperial powers, it created a country which was not accepted by all those who found themselves within it.


And it seems that it was much like the Palestinian problem with outsiders coming in and taking the indigenous peoples land

The State of Israel HAS NEVER BEEN RATIFIED BY THE US SECURITY COUNCIL>>>>>>>THUS DEEMING ISRAEL ILLEGAL......FACT....YOU ARE BUT ILLEGAL SQUATTERS.....FACT.I'm theliq,all knowing LIQ...ever living,ever faithful,ever sure.

Who is the zionist scurge or trash, which you write in capitals? I believe in Israel's right to exist. Does that make me zionist trash?

Depends on how you'd like israel to exist, as an occuper, agressor, oppressor, herrenvolk state or an inclusive, western-style, democracy that gives equal rights for all it's citizens regardless of their religion or ethnicity, including allowing a right of return to all those citizens ethically cleansed in 1948.

 

[Linkiloo]

The war is ongoing, or hadn't you noticed? Winners and losers are normally determined at the end of hostilities. The Brits never won against the Germans in WW2 from 1939-1942 remember?

Hmm, so you think I do not notice things eh? You are funny. And your example of the Brits and the Germans spans a mere 3 years. You are really funny. Especially since the Germans did lose.

And since you haven't noticed, let me remind you. The partition plan gave some to the Arabs and some to Israel, but the Arabs went to war. At the end of the hostilities, Israel had more than the original plan. 1967. At the end of the hostilities Israel had even more; the whole of Gaza, the whole of the West Bank and even the whole of the Sinai. And a nice chunk taken away from Syria in the Golan heights. Yom Kipper war in 1973. Hmm, let me see. Nope. Nothing lost there at the end of the hostilities either.

And even since, Israel gave back Gaza and the Sinai.

The Zionist Israelis are indeed currently "winning", just like the Nazi Germans from 1939-42. The partition plan would have given 43% of the best land in Palestine to the minority immigrant Zionist colonists, while the native Palestinians would have been left with land mostly unfit for agriculture. The plan was fundamentaly unfair and yet you wonder why the natives opposed it. The native Arabs went to war to stop the Zionist ethnic cleansing and the hostilities never ended. In 1967 the Zionists waged an aggressive war to steal yet more territory and the war went on. Remember Nazi Germany conquered most of Europe and a huge chunk of the USSR at one point, but eventually lost it all. The war is not over yet.

Well there is the same ARROGANCE with the ZIONIST SCURGE,as there was with the NAZIS...and the Zionists try to desensitize people about the FINE PALESTINIANS,in the same way the NAZIS did to the Jews......Please note I have NOT paired Jews and ZIONIST TRASH as they are both very different types of people....Say NO TO ZIONISM.

I'm changing the "Teddyearp" monika to TEADDY TWERP because he is a Rabid Zionista........steve...and talks Shit most of the time

Of course I can. But my question is, why do you insist on making a fool of yourself? It's as if you just can't help it.

Anglo-Iraqi Treaty - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

A treaty is not administrative control you idiot, and it was not ratified for 2 years.

from your link

The treaty was signed on behalf of the British by Sir Percy Cox on October 10, 1922. However, it was not ratified by the Iraqi government until 1924. It was only when the British High Commissioner threatened to wield his authority to scrap the constitution, drafted by the Iraqi constituent assembly, that the treaty was finally ratified. It was seen with disdain by many of the people of the new Kingdom, both Sunni and Shia. While it was the first step towards complete independence from the imperial powers, it created a country which was not accepted by all those who found themselves within it.


And it seems that it was much like the Palestinian problem with outsiders coming in and taking the indigenous peoples land

The State of Israel HAS NEVER BEEN RATIFIED BY THE US SECURITY COUNCIL>>>>>>>THUS DEEMING ISRAEL ILLEGAL......FACT....YOU ARE BUT ILLEGAL SQUATTERS.....FACT.I'm theliq,all knowing LIQ...ever living,ever faithful,ever sure.

Who is the zionist scurge or trash, which you write in capitals? I believe in Israel's right to exist. Does that make me zionist trash?

Depends on how you'd like israel to exist, as an occuper, agressor, oppressor, herrenvolk state or an inclusive, western-style, democracy that gives equal rights for all it's citizens regardless of their religion or ethnicity, including allowing a right of return to all those citizens ethically cleansed in 1948.

Sounds like being a zionist for you means accepting that the Jewish state is not Jewish going forward? Nope, I don't agree with that. I hope for a two state solution with land swaps but no right of return. I think the Jews understandably want their Jewish state, as do the Palestinians. So am I zionist trash or should I say ZIONIST TRASH?

 

[Challenger]

Hmm, so you think I do not notice things eh? You are funny. And your example of the Brits and the Germans spans a mere 3 years. You are really funny. Especially since the Germans did lose.

And since you haven't noticed, let me remind you. The partition plan gave some to the Arabs and some to Israel, but the Arabs went to war. At the end of the hostilities, Israel had more than the original plan. 1967. At the end of the hostilities Israel had even more; the whole of Gaza, the whole of the West Bank and even the whole of the Sinai. And a nice chunk taken away from Syria in the Golan heights. Yom Kipper war in 1973. Hmm, let me see. Nope. Nothing lost there at the end of the hostilities either.

And even since, Israel gave back Gaza and the Sinai.

The Zionist Israelis are indeed currently "winning", just like the Nazi Germans from 1939-42. The partition plan would have given 43% of the best land in Palestine to the minority immigrant Zionist colonists, while the native Palestinians would have been left with land mostly unfit for agriculture. The plan was fundamentaly unfair and yet you wonder why the natives opposed it. The native Arabs went to war to stop the Zionist ethnic cleansing and the hostilities never ended. In 1967 the Zionists waged an aggressive war to steal yet more territory and the war went on. Remember Nazi Germany conquered most of Europe and a huge chunk of the USSR at one point, but eventually lost it all. The war is not over yet.

Well there is the same ARROGANCE with the ZIONIST SCURGE,as there was with the NAZIS...and the Zionists try to desensitize people about the FINE PALESTINIANS,in the same way the NAZIS did to the Jews......Please note I have NOT paired Jews and ZIONIST TRASH as they are both very different types of people....Say NO TO ZIONISM.

I'm changing the "Teddyearp" monika to TEADDY TWERP because he is a Rabid Zionista........steve...and talks Shit most of the time

Of course I can. But my question is, why do you insist on making a fool of yourself? It's as if you just can't help it.

Anglo-Iraqi Treaty - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

A treaty is not administrative control you idiot, and it was not ratified for 2 years.

from your link

The treaty was signed on behalf of the British by Sir Percy Cox on October 10, 1922. However, it was not ratified by the Iraqi government until 1924. It was only when the British High Commissioner threatened to wield his authority to scrap the constitution, drafted by the Iraqi constituent assembly, that the treaty was finally ratified. It was seen with disdain by many of the people of the new Kingdom, both Sunni and Shia. While it was the first step towards complete independence from the imperial powers, it created a country which was not accepted by all those who found themselves within it.


And it seems that it was much like the Palestinian problem with outsiders coming in and taking the indigenous peoples land

The State of Israel HAS NEVER BEEN RATIFIED BY THE US SECURITY COUNCIL>>>>>>>THUS DEEMING ISRAEL ILLEGAL......FACT....YOU ARE BUT ILLEGAL SQUATTERS.....FACT.I'm theliq,all knowing LIQ...ever living,ever faithful,ever sure.

Who is the zionist scurge or trash, which you write in capitals? I believe in Israel's right to exist. Does that make me zionist trash?

Depends on how you'd like israel to exist, as an occuper, agressor, oppressor, herrenvolk state or an inclusive, western-style, democracy that gives equal rights for all it's citizens regardless of their religion or ethnicity, including allowing a right of return to all those citizens ethically cleansed in 1948.

Sounds like being a zionist for you means accepting that the Jewish state is not Jewish going forward? Nope, I don't agree with that. I hope for a two state solution with land swaps but no right of return. I think the Jews understandably want their Jewish state, as do the Palestinians. So am I zionist trash or should I say ZIONIST TRASH?

I didn't say that. Why can't Israel be a secular state, it works reasonably well in America?

 

[Linkiloo]

The Zionist Israelis are indeed currently "winning", just like the Nazi Germans from 1939-42. The partition plan would have given 43% of the best land in Palestine to the minority immigrant Zionist colonists, while the native Palestinians would have been left with land mostly unfit for agriculture. The plan was fundamentaly unfair and yet you wonder why the natives opposed it. The native Arabs went to war to stop the Zionist ethnic cleansing and the hostilities never ended. In 1967 the Zionists waged an aggressive war to steal yet more territory and the war went on. Remember Nazi Germany conquered most of Europe and a huge chunk of the USSR at one point, but eventually lost it all. The war is not over yet.

Well there is the same ARROGANCE with the ZIONIST SCURGE,as there was with the NAZIS...and the Zionists try to desensitize people about the FINE PALESTINIANS,in the same way the NAZIS did to the Jews......Please note I have NOT paired Jews and ZIONIST TRASH as they are both very different types of people....Say NO TO ZIONISM.

I'm changing the "Teddyearp" monika to TEADDY TWERP because he is a Rabid Zionista........steve...and talks Shit most of the time

A treaty is not administrative control you idiot, and it was not ratified for 2 years.

from your link

The treaty was signed on behalf of the British by Sir Percy Cox on October 10, 1922. However, it was not ratified by the Iraqi government until 1924. It was only when the British High Commissioner threatened to wield his authority to scrap the constitution, drafted by the Iraqi constituent assembly, that the treaty was finally ratified. It was seen with disdain by many of the people of the new Kingdom, both Sunni and Shia. While it was the first step towards complete independence from the imperial powers, it created a country which was not accepted by all those who found themselves within it.


And it seems that it was much like the Palestinian problem with outsiders coming in and taking the indigenous peoples land

The State of Israel HAS NEVER BEEN RATIFIED BY THE US SECURITY COUNCIL>>>>>>>THUS DEEMING ISRAEL ILLEGAL......FACT....YOU ARE BUT ILLEGAL SQUATTERS.....FACT.I'm theliq,all knowing LIQ...ever living,ever faithful,ever sure.

Who is the zionist scurge or trash, which you write in capitals? I believe in Israel's right to exist. Does that make me zionist trash?

Depends on how you'd like israel to exist, as an occuper, agressor, oppressor, herrenvolk state or an inclusive, western-style, democracy that gives equal rights for all it's citizens regardless of their religion or ethnicity, including allowing a right of return to all those citizens ethically cleansed in 1948.

Sounds like being a zionist for you means accepting that the Jewish state is not Jewish going forward? Nope, I don't agree with that. I hope for a two state solution with land swaps but no right of return. I think the Jews understandably want their Jewish state, as do the Palestinians. So am I zionist trash or should I say ZIONIST TRASH?

I didn't say that. Why can't Israel be a secular state, it works reasonably well in America?

Because it hasn't worked well anywhere else in the middle east. Pretty obvious answer I'd say.

 

[Phoenall]

MANDATE FOR PALESTINE which became International law invites the Jews to migrate.

Want to argue with the ICJ on that matter ?


And by the way you are the one TROLLING and will be reported every time for it.

Show me the actual invitation to migrate. I'll even give you a link. The Avalon Project The Palestine Mandate

Why cant you read and understand 1922 English


ART. 6.
The Administration of Palestine, while ensuring that the rights and position of other sections of the population are not prejudiced, shall facilitate Jewish immigration under suitable conditions and shall encourage, in co-operation with the Jewish agency referred to in Article 4, close settlement by Jews on the land, including State lands and waste lands not required for public purposes.



ART. 7.
The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

Not a sign of any invitation to migrate in either article. Try again.

So saying SHALL facilitate Jewish immigration. Is not inviting the Jews to migrate.

Try going for remedial English lessons

facilitate
simplify process:
to make something easy or easier to do​

I don't see anything in there that looks like an invitation.

Of course you don't as that would destroy your islamonazi propaganda that the Jews are illegal immigrants

 

[Phoenall]

Not a sign of any invitation to migrate in either article. Try again.

"shall facilitate Jewish immigration under suitable conditions and shall encourage, in co-operation with the Jewish agency referred to in Article 4, close settlement by Jews on the land, including State lands and waste lands not required for public purposes."

Seems pretty clear to me, dimwit.

And to the majority of the worlds population as well. The Jews were invited to migrate and settle the land of Palestine. No where does it say the arab muslims were invited to migrate and settle the land

 

[Phoenall]

Like Manifest Destiny.

Absolutely, like the great return of the monarch butterflies to their ancestral homeland.

And embodied in International law at the time

 

[Phoenall]

The Zionist Israelis are indeed currently "winning", just like the Nazi Germans from 1939-42. The partition plan would have given 43% of the best land in Palestine to the minority immigrant Zionist colonists, while the native Palestinians would have been left with land mostly unfit for agriculture. The plan was fundamentaly unfair and yet you wonder why the natives opposed it. The native Arabs went to war to stop the Zionist ethnic cleansing and the hostilities never ended. In 1967 the Zionists waged an aggressive war to steal yet more territory and the war went on. Remember Nazi Germany conquered most of Europe and a huge chunk of the USSR at one point, but eventually lost it all. The war is not over yet.

Well there is the same ARROGANCE with the ZIONIST SCURGE,as there was with the NAZIS...and the Zionists try to desensitize people about the FINE PALESTINIANS,in the same way the NAZIS did to the Jews......Please note I have NOT paired Jews and ZIONIST TRASH as they are both very different types of people....Say NO TO ZIONISM.

I'm changing the "Teddyearp" monika to TEADDY TWERP because he is a Rabid Zionista........steve...and talks Shit most of the time

A treaty is not administrative control you idiot, and it was not ratified for 2 years.

from your link

The treaty was signed on behalf of the British by Sir Percy Cox on October 10, 1922. However, it was not ratified by the Iraqi government until 1924. It was only when the British High Commissioner threatened to wield his authority to scrap the constitution, drafted by the Iraqi constituent assembly, that the treaty was finally ratified. It was seen with disdain by many of the people of the new Kingdom, both Sunni and Shia. While it was the first step towards complete independence from the imperial powers, it created a country which was not accepted by all those who found themselves within it.


And it seems that it was much like the Palestinian problem with outsiders coming in and taking the indigenous peoples land

The State of Israel HAS NEVER BEEN RATIFIED BY THE US SECURITY COUNCIL>>>>>>>THUS DEEMING ISRAEL ILLEGAL......FACT....YOU ARE BUT ILLEGAL SQUATTERS.....FACT.I'm theliq,all knowing LIQ...ever living,ever faithful,ever sure.

Who is the zionist scurge or trash, which you write in capitals? I believe in Israel's right to exist. Does that make me zionist trash?

Depends on how you'd like israel to exist, as an occuper, agressor, oppressor, herrenvolk state or an inclusive, western-style, democracy that gives equal rights for all it's citizens regardless of their religion or ethnicity, including allowing a right of return to all those citizens ethically cleansed in 1948.

Sounds like being a zionist for you means accepting that the Jewish state is not Jewish going forward? Nope, I don't agree with that. I hope for a two state solution with land swaps but no right of return. I think the Jews understandably want their Jewish state, as do the Palestinians. So am I zionist trash or should I say ZIONIST TRASH?

I didn't say that. Why can't Israel be a secular state, it works reasonably well in America?

Why should it be secular, this works for every Islamic state ?

 

[nat4900]

Why should it be secular, this works for every Islamic state ?

True and an interesting question.....Which, in turn, raises another question:

Why, then, should Israel be treated by us (in support, intelligence sharing, and funds, etc.) any different than we treat a Jordan or Algeria or (dare I say) Iran?

As a country, we have never been too fond of any government that placed religious ideology before secular neutrality.

 

[Phoenall]

Why should it be secular, this works for every Islamic state ?

True and an interesting question.....Which, in turn, raises another question:

Why, then, should Israel be treated by us (in support, intelligence sharing, and funds, etc.) any different than we treat a Jordan or Algeria or (dare I say) Iran?

As a country, we have never been too fond of any government that placed religious ideology before secular neutrality.

Because it allows the west a foothold in the M.E. in case of attack from Russia or China. Israel provides the west with realistically priced Pharmaceuticals and medical supplies when ever we need them. Israel shares its defence strategy and infrastructure with the west out of goodwill. What does islam share apart from aggression and terrorism............

 

[nat4900]

Why should it be secular, this works for every Islamic state ?

True and an interesting question.....Which, in turn, raises another question:

Why, then, should Israel be treated by us (in support, intelligence sharing, and funds, etc.) any different than we treat a Jordan or Algeria or (dare I say) Iran?

As a country, we have never been too fond of any government that placed religious ideology before secular neutrality.

Because it allows the west a foothold in the M.E. in case of attack from Russia or China. Israel provides the west with realistically priced Pharmaceuticals and medical supplies when ever we need them. Israel shares its defence strategy and infrastructure with the west out of goodwill. What does islam share apart from aggression and terrorism............[/QUOTE]

OIL (just ask Cheney)......lol

(Oh, you're really worried that China and/or Russia is planning an attack and that Israel will defend us?)