Jews for Justice..... If Americans really Knew

They fire these weapons and they die..............That's the deal................too damned bad.

Are you talking about the Palestinians......the Israelis...or both???
You know who I was talking about............and people die on both sides of Wars................When the IDF went in to blow up those PEACEFUL TUNNELS they lost men.................as did the other side...............

They need to stop the rocket attacks from Gaza................or they will get hit again, and again, and again.
 
You know who I was talking about............and people die on both sides of Wars................When the IDF went in to blow up those PEACEFUL TUNNELS they lost men.................as did the other side...............

They need to stop the rocket attacks from Gaza................or they will get hit again, and again, and again

Actually agree.....AND, the Israeli need to stop expanding into the Palestinian reservations AND allow them to establish their own state (but I believe that the current Israeli government will not allow a 2 state solution PRECISELY because they have plans to take MORE Palestinian land.)
 
Here from the original article since you can't read and can only be profane (poor thing)....In short, Zionism was based on a faulty, colonialist world view that the rights of the indigenous inhabitants didn’t matter. The Arabs’ opposition to Zionism wasn’t based on anti-Semitism but rather on a totally reasonable fear of the dispossession of their people.

Yes, link to a ******* POS blog as if it were the ******* King James bible...sorry douchebag, but that website has less credibility than the ******* Onion, which at least is entertaining.

You still have yet to address the points totally crushing your bullshit:

1-when Israel gave back south lebanon and gaza to the arabs, the arabs used those areas to stage terrorism and attacks against Israel, so land has NOTHING to do with this conflict

2-arab muslims do not tolerate the sovereignty of any other group in the middle east

3-arab muslims are ethnically cleansing out all minority groups out of the middle east

4-a large portion, if not a majority, of the arab muslims living in the west bank/gaza strip/Israel in 1930 were IMMIGRANTS from other arab muslim countries

Until you can address these FACTS, there is not a ******* word you can offer that is of interest to anyone else, idiot.
 
Actually agree.....AND, the Israeli need to stop expanding into the Palestinian reservations AND allow them to establish their own state (but I believe that the current Israeli government will not allow a 2 state solution PRECISELY because they have plans to take MORE Palestinian land.)

Israeli apartment building in the West bank is "forcing" the hamas animal filth to build tunnels from gaza? Yeah, that makes sense.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Israeli apartment building in the West bank is "forcing" the hamas animal filth to build tunnels from gaza? Yeah, that makes sense. You're a ******* idiot.


So, the enema hasn't helped???? Do you have a garden hose?
 
The Zionist Israelis are indeed currently "winning", just like the Nazi Germans from 1939-42. The partition plan would have given 43% of the best land in Palestine to the minority immigrant Zionist colonists, while the native Palestinians would have been left with land mostly unfit for agriculture. The plan was fundamentaly unfair and yet you wonder why the natives opposed it. The native Arabs went to war to stop the Zionist ethnic cleansing and the hostilities never ended. In 1967 the Zionists waged an aggressive war to steal yet more territory and the war went on. Remember Nazi Germany conquered most of Europe and a huge chunk of the USSR at one point, but eventually lost it all. The war is not over yet.

You know what? I am tired of arguing with you folks. I could waste my time with a long and drawn out reply, but I will just stop and say this. Your user name of "Challenger" should be changed to "Challenged". As in mentally; or better, like the rest of the pro-pals, you have such a bad case of rectal cranial insertion problem that all you see is the BS.

Quick snippet: To compare the failed Nazi attempt of conquest that lasted at most (according to your own post) 3 years to the struggle that Israel has been going through (and still winning) for the last almost 70 years just shows how Challenged you are.
 
My money's on this one succeeding. After all, it's in all the books as doing so.
 
And the only way this one can succeed is for more arab muslims to migrate to Palestine illegally, say another 50 million or so.
 
And the only way this one can succeed is for more arab muslims to migrate to Palestine illegally, say another 50 million or so.
 
The Zionist Israelis are indeed currently "winning", just like the Nazi Germans from 1939-42. The partition plan would have given 43% of the best land in Palestine to the minority immigrant Zionist colonists, while the native Palestinians would have been left with land mostly unfit for agriculture. The plan was fundamentaly unfair and yet you wonder why the natives opposed it. The native Arabs went to war to stop the Zionist ethnic cleansing and the hostilities never ended. In 1967 the Zionists waged an aggressive war to steal yet more territory and the war went on. Remember Nazi Germany conquered most of Europe and a huge chunk of the USSR at one point, but eventually lost it all. The war is not over yet.

You know what? I am tired of arguing with you folks. I could waste my time with a long and drawn out reply, but I will just stop and say this. Your user name of "Challenger" should be changed to "Challenged". As in mentally; or better, like the rest of the pro-pals, you have such a bad case of rectal cranial insertion problem that all you see is the BS.

Quick snippet: To compare the failed Nazi attempt of conquest that lasted at most (according to your own post) 3 years to the struggle that Israel has been going through (and still winning) for the last almost 70 years just shows how Challenged you are.

Just goes to show you need at least 1 superpower covering your arse. Nazi Germany took on all of modern industrialised Europe and it took 3 superpowers to beat her in almost 6 years of constant warfare. Zionist Isreal, in comparison, has had to mobilise to anything approaching that level only 4 times in 70 years and waged aggressive war on three of those occasions against disorganised and/or unprepared enemies. The rest of the time Israel has had to contend against an oppressed and fractured indigenous people, armed with a tiny, tiny, fraction of the weaponry Zionist Isreal possesses, defending it's right to exist. The fact they're still there fighting, after 70 years is a "victory" in itself.

Throw around as many insults as you like, it changes nothing, just demonstrates the fact you know deep down that I'm right, and that frightens you and your ilk.

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
 
The Zionist Israelis are indeed currently "winning", just like the Nazi Germans from 1939-42. The partition plan would have given 43% of the best land in Palestine to the minority immigrant Zionist colonists, while the native Palestinians would have been left with land mostly unfit for agriculture. The plan was fundamentaly unfair and yet you wonder why the natives opposed it. The native Arabs went to war to stop the Zionist ethnic cleansing and the hostilities never ended. In 1967 the Zionists waged an aggressive war to steal yet more territory and the war went on. Remember Nazi Germany conquered most of Europe and a huge chunk of the USSR at one point, but eventually lost it all. The war is not over yet.

You know what? I am tired of arguing with you folks. I could waste my time with a long and drawn out reply, but I will just stop and say this. Your user name of "Challenger" should be changed to "Challenged". As in mentally; or better, like the rest of the pro-pals, you have such a bad case of rectal cranial insertion problem that all you see is the BS.

Quick snippet: To compare the failed Nazi attempt of conquest that lasted at most (according to your own post) 3 years to the struggle that Israel has been going through (and still winning) for the last almost 70 years just shows how Challenged you are.

Just goes to show you need at least 1 superpower covering your arse. Nazi Germany took on all of modern industrialised Europe and it took 3 superpowers to beat her in almost 6 years of constant warfare. Zionist Isreal, in comparison, has had to mobilise to anything approaching that level only 4 times in 70 years and waged aggressive war on three of those occasions against disorganised and/or unprepared enemies. The rest of the time Israel has had to contend against an oppressed and fractured indigenous people, armed with a tiny, tiny, fraction of the weaponry Zionist Isreal possesses, defending it's right to exist. The fact they're still there fighting, after 70 years is a "victory" in itself.

Throw around as many insults as you like, it changes nothing, just demonstrates the fact you know deep down that I'm right, and that frightens you and your ilk.

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
LOL

The Arab League that ATTACKED ISRAEL to begin with was a force from the entire Middle East.

In the 1967 War Egypt and Syria were massed on their borders and outnumbered the Israeli's 4 to one provided for them by the Russians................

and in 1971 Egypt started the attack again armed with Russian Equipment, and again outnumbering the Israeli's...............

On all occasions the Israeli's were outnumbered and Won the day. Not only did they win, in the last Two, but they kicked the living hell out of them with fewer numbers.

Your distortion of history is typical.
 
The Zionist Israelis are indeed currently "winning", just like the Nazi Germans from 1939-42. The partition plan would have given 43% of the best land in Palestine to the minority immigrant Zionist colonists, while the native Palestinians would have been left with land mostly unfit for agriculture. The plan was fundamentaly unfair and yet you wonder why the natives opposed it. The native Arabs went to war to stop the Zionist ethnic cleansing and the hostilities never ended. In 1967 the Zionists waged an aggressive war to steal yet more territory and the war went on. Remember Nazi Germany conquered most of Europe and a huge chunk of the USSR at one point, but eventually lost it all. The war is not over yet.

You know what? I am tired of arguing with you folks. I could waste my time with a long and drawn out reply, but I will just stop and say this. Your user name of "Challenger" should be changed to "Challenged". As in mentally; or better, like the rest of the pro-pals, you have such a bad case of rectal cranial insertion problem that all you see is the BS.

Quick snippet: To compare the failed Nazi attempt of conquest that lasted at most (according to your own post) 3 years to the struggle that Israel has been going through (and still winning) for the last almost 70 years just shows how Challenged you are.

Just goes to show you need at least 1 superpower covering your arse. Nazi Germany took on all of modern industrialised Europe and it took 3 superpowers to beat her in almost 6 years of constant warfare. Zionist Isreal, in comparison, has had to mobilise to anything approaching that level only 4 times in 70 years and waged aggressive war on three of those occasions against disorganised and/or unprepared enemies. The rest of the time Israel has had to contend against an oppressed and fractured indigenous people, armed with a tiny, tiny, fraction of the weaponry Zionist Isreal possesses, defending it's right to exist. The fact they're still there fighting, after 70 years is a "victory" in itself.

Throw around as many insults as you like, it changes nothing, just demonstrates the fact you know deep down that I'm right, and that frightens you and your ilk.

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
LOL

The Arab League that ATTACKED ISRAEL to begin with was a force from the entire Middle East.

In the 1967 War Egypt and Syria were massed on their borders and outnumbered the Israeli's 4 to one provided for them by the Russians................

and in 1971 Egypt started the attack again armed with Russian Equipment, and again outnumbering the Israeli's...............

On all occasions the Israeli's were outnumbered and Won the day. Not only did they win, in the last Two, but they kicked the living hell out of them with fewer numbers.

Your distortion of history is typical.

I find the "distorting of history" accusation amusing coming from someone who clearly toes the Zionist Hasbara line. Zionists have distorted history for decades until in a moment of hubris, complacency or just incompetance, the Government released all the 1948 archives to the public, allowing Historians to finally be able to get at the truth. It's no accident, they've not done so for the 1956, 1967, or 1973 wars.

The truth then:

The neighbouring Arab forces invaded Palestine in 1948 ostensibly to prevent further ethnic cleansing by the Zionists. Abdullah of Jordan, had already made a deal with the Zionists to occupy Jerusalem and the Palestinian area subsequently known as the West Bank. Syria and Iraq invaded the northernmost area of the West bank more to prevent the Jordanians achieving their aims, than any intent to destroy the newly declared state. Lebanon was sympathetic to the Zionists at the time and only made a token gesture of "attacking" before subsequently pulling back and taking no further part in any operations. Syrian and Egyptian forces did cross into areas that the Zionists declared sovereignty over, but lacked the equipment and ammunition (not to mention training and experience) needed to have any effect. If I recall correctly, the Syrians were held back by two home made artillery pieces and the egyptians were stopped by battle hardened Jewish veterans of Stalingrad, defending one of their settlements. The egyptian force contained various contingents of "volunteers" from other Muslim countries but they were less than useless and more a burden than a help to the Egyptians.

The Arabs were under an arms embargo and were unable to resupply their forces, never having expected to have to actually go to war. The Zionists, while under the same embargo, had been preparing for war for years beforehand and basically ignored the embargo, import modern weapons and equipment via the Soviets and their satellite regimes in Eastern Europe after the british had left. In 1948 the Zionist forces outnumbered the combined arab forces in theatre, and once properly equipped, were easily able to launch an aggressive war of conquest.

I don't have time now to debunk the other conflicts but really, you need to read some objective and scholarly works and not just regurgitate Zionist hasbara historiography. Oh, did you mean 1973, when you wrote 1971?
 
The Zionist Israelis are indeed currently "winning", just like the Nazi Germans from 1939-42. The partition plan would have given 43% of the best land in Palestine to the minority immigrant Zionist colonists, while the native Palestinians would have been left with land mostly unfit for agriculture. The plan was fundamentaly unfair and yet you wonder why the natives opposed it. The native Arabs went to war to stop the Zionist ethnic cleansing and the hostilities never ended. In 1967 the Zionists waged an aggressive war to steal yet more territory and the war went on. Remember Nazi Germany conquered most of Europe and a huge chunk of the USSR at one point, but eventually lost it all. The war is not over yet.

You know what? I am tired of arguing with you folks. I could waste my time with a long and drawn out reply, but I will just stop and say this. Your user name of "Challenger" should be changed to "Challenged". As in mentally; or better, like the rest of the pro-pals, you have such a bad case of rectal cranial insertion problem that all you see is the BS.

Quick snippet: To compare the failed Nazi attempt of conquest that lasted at most (according to your own post) 3 years to the struggle that Israel has been going through (and still winning) for the last almost 70 years just shows how Challenged you are.

Just goes to show you need at least 1 superpower covering your arse. Nazi Germany took on all of modern industrialised Europe and it took 3 superpowers to beat her in almost 6 years of constant warfare. Zionist Isreal, in comparison, has had to mobilise to anything approaching that level only 4 times in 70 years and waged aggressive war on three of those occasions against disorganised and/or unprepared enemies. The rest of the time Israel has had to contend against an oppressed and fractured indigenous people, armed with a tiny, tiny, fraction of the weaponry Zionist Isreal possesses, defending it's right to exist. The fact they're still there fighting, after 70 years is a "victory" in itself.

Throw around as many insults as you like, it changes nothing, just demonstrates the fact you know deep down that I'm right, and that frightens you and your ilk.

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
LOL

The Arab League that ATTACKED ISRAEL to begin with was a force from the entire Middle East.

In the 1967 War Egypt and Syria were massed on their borders and outnumbered the Israeli's 4 to one provided for them by the Russians................

and in 1971 Egypt started the attack again armed with Russian Equipment, and again outnumbering the Israeli's...............

On all occasions the Israeli's were outnumbered and Won the day. Not only did they win, in the last Two, but they kicked the living hell out of them with fewer numbers.

Your distortion of history is typical.

I find the "distorting of history" accusation amusing coming from someone who clearly toes the Zionist Hasbara line. Zionists have distorted history for decades until in a moment of hubris, complacency or just incompetance, the Government released all the 1948 archives to the public, allowing Historians to finally be able to get at the truth. It's no accident, they've not done so for the 1956, 1967, or 1973 wars.

The truth then:

The neighbouring Arab forces invaded Palestine in 1948 ostensibly to prevent further ethnic cleansing by the Zionists. Abdullah of Jordan, had already made a deal with the Zionists to occupy Jerusalem and the Palestinian area subsequently known as the West Bank. Syria and Iraq invaded the northernmost area of the West bank more to prevent the Jordanians achieving their aims, than any intent to destroy the newly declared state. Lebanon was sympathetic to the Zionists at the time and only made a token gesture of "attacking" before subsequently pulling back and taking no further part in any operations. Syrian and Egyptian forces did cross into areas that the Zionists declared sovereignty over, but lacked the equipment and ammunition (not to mention training and experience) needed to have any effect. If I recall correctly, the Syrians were held back by two home made artillery pieces and the egyptians were stopped by battle hardened Jewish veterans of Stalingrad, defending one of their settlements. The egyptian force contained various contingents of "volunteers" from other Muslim countries but they were less than useless and more a burden than a help to the Egyptians.

The Arabs were under an arms embargo and were unable to resupply their forces, never having expected to have to actually go to war. The Zionists, while under the same embargo, had been preparing for war for years beforehand and basically ignored the embargo, import modern weapons and equipment via the Soviets and their satellite regimes in Eastern Europe after the british had left. In 1948 the Zionist forces outnumbered the combined arab forces in theatre, and once properly equipped, were easily able to launch an aggressive war of conquest.

I don't have time now to debunk the other conflicts but really, you need to read some objective and scholarly works and not just regurgitate Zionist hasbara historiography. Oh, did you mean 1973, when you wrote 1971?
DEBUNK.................LOL

You mean LIE your little ass off.
 
15th post
The Arab League that ATTACKED ISRAEL to begin with was a force from the entire Middle East.

In the 1967 War Egypt and Syria were massed on their borders and outnumbered the Israeli's 4 to one provided for them by the Russians................

and in 1971 Egypt started the attack again armed with Russian Equipment, and again outnumbering the Israeli's...............

On all occasions the Israeli's were outnumbered and Won the day. Not only did they win, in the last Two, but they kicked the living hell out of them with fewer numbers.

Well, you're partially correct, Beagle

But a factor is now a bit different then 40 years ago....Our own Gulf wars have given Islamic forces plenty of "practice" on warfare, and the tons and tons of US weaponry that were left behind...... (because they were too "expensive" to ship back home and the US military complex needed to gauge taxpayers some more).....have now made their way into virtually every country in that region.......

So, since we....the US.....the most powerful of all armed forces.....haven't necessarily "won" since we engaged in that area (and I hope you're not saying that the IDF is better than our military)
the scenario in that part of the world is much different than the 1960s.
 
The Zionist Israelis are indeed currently "winning", just like the Nazi Germans from 1939-42. The partition plan would have given 43% of the best land in Palestine to the minority immigrant Zionist colonists, while the native Palestinians would have been left with land mostly unfit for agriculture. The plan was fundamentaly unfair and yet you wonder why the natives opposed it. The native Arabs went to war to stop the Zionist ethnic cleansing and the hostilities never ended. In 1967 the Zionists waged an aggressive war to steal yet more territory and the war went on. Remember Nazi Germany conquered most of Europe and a huge chunk of the USSR at one point, but eventually lost it all. The war is not over yet.

You know what? I am tired of arguing with you folks. I could waste my time with a long and drawn out reply, but I will just stop and say this. Your user name of "Challenger" should be changed to "Challenged". As in mentally; or better, like the rest of the pro-pals, you have such a bad case of rectal cranial insertion problem that all you see is the BS.

Quick snippet: To compare the failed Nazi attempt of conquest that lasted at most (according to your own post) 3 years to the struggle that Israel has been going through (and still winning) for the last almost 70 years just shows how Challenged you are.

Just goes to show you need at least 1 superpower covering your arse. Nazi Germany took on all of modern industrialised Europe and it took 3 superpowers to beat her in almost 6 years of constant warfare. Zionist Isreal, in comparison, has had to mobilise to anything approaching that level only 4 times in 70 years and waged aggressive war on three of those occasions against disorganised and/or unprepared enemies. The rest of the time Israel has had to contend against an oppressed and fractured indigenous people, armed with a tiny, tiny, fraction of the weaponry Zionist Isreal possesses, defending it's right to exist. The fact they're still there fighting, after 70 years is a "victory" in itself.

Throw around as many insults as you like, it changes nothing, just demonstrates the fact you know deep down that I'm right, and that frightens you and your ilk.

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
LOL

The Arab League that ATTACKED ISRAEL to begin with was a force from the entire Middle East.

In the 1967 War Egypt and Syria were massed on their borders and outnumbered the Israeli's 4 to one provided for them by the Russians................

and in 1971 Egypt started the attack again armed with Russian Equipment, and again outnumbering the Israeli's...............

On all occasions the Israeli's were outnumbered and Won the day. Not only did they win, in the last Two, but they kicked the living hell out of them with fewer numbers.

Your distortion of history is typical.

I find the "distorting of history" accusation amusing coming from someone who clearly toes the Zionist Hasbara line. Zionists have distorted history for decades until in a moment of hubris, complacency or just incompetance, the Government released all the 1948 archives to the public, allowing Historians to finally be able to get at the truth. It's no accident, they've not done so for the 1956, 1967, or 1973 wars.

The truth then:

The neighbouring Arab forces invaded Palestine in 1948 ostensibly to prevent further ethnic cleansing by the Zionists. Abdullah of Jordan, had already made a deal with the Zionists to occupy Jerusalem and the Palestinian area subsequently known as the West Bank. Syria and Iraq invaded the northernmost area of the West bank more to prevent the Jordanians achieving their aims, than any intent to destroy the newly declared state. Lebanon was sympathetic to the Zionists at the time and only made a token gesture of "attacking" before subsequently pulling back and taking no further part in any operations. Syrian and Egyptian forces did cross into areas that the Zionists declared sovereignty over, but lacked the equipment and ammunition (not to mention training and experience) needed to have any effect. If I recall correctly, the Syrians were held back by two home made artillery pieces and the egyptians were stopped by battle hardened Jewish veterans of Stalingrad, defending one of their settlements. The egyptian force contained various contingents of "volunteers" from other Muslim countries but they were less than useless and more a burden than a help to the Egyptians.

The Arabs were under an arms embargo and were unable to resupply their forces, never having expected to have to actually go to war. The Zionists, while under the same embargo, had been preparing for war for years beforehand and basically ignored the embargo, import modern weapons and equipment via the Soviets and their satellite regimes in Eastern Europe after the british had left. In 1948 the Zionist forces outnumbered the combined arab forces in theatre, and once properly equipped, were easily able to launch an aggressive war of conquest.

I don't have time now to debunk the other conflicts but really, you need to read some objective and scholarly works and not just regurgitate Zionist hasbara historiography. Oh, did you mean 1973, when you wrote 1971?
DEBUNK.................LOL

You mean LIE your little ass off.

Throw around as many insults as you like, it changes nothing, just demonstrates the fact you know deep down that I'm right, and that frightens you and your ilk.

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
 
The Arab League that ATTACKED ISRAEL to begin with was a force from the entire Middle East.

In the 1967 War Egypt and Syria were massed on their borders and outnumbered the Israeli's 4 to one provided for them by the Russians................

and in 1971 Egypt started the attack again armed with Russian Equipment, and again outnumbering the Israeli's...............

On all occasions the Israeli's were outnumbered and Won the day. Not only did they win, in the last Two, but they kicked the living hell out of them with fewer numbers.

Well, you're partially correct, Beagle

But a factor is now a bit different then 40 years ago....Our own Gulf wars have given Islamic forces plenty of "practice" on warfare, and the tons and tons of US weaponry that were left behind...... (because they were too "expensive" to ship back home and the US military complex needed to gauge taxpayers some more).....have now made their way into virtually every country in that region.......

So, since we....the US.....the most powerful of all armed forces.....haven't necessarily "won" since we engaged in that area (and I hope you're not saying that the IDF is better than our military)
the scenario in that part of the world is much different than the 1960s.
And who made the decision to leave the military hardware behind????????

Maybe you should have sent him a Memo telling him it's a bad idea.................along with pulling out completely while the issue wasn't over yet.................

You talk about WINNING...................About I'm saying the IDF is better than our military..............where the Hell did you find that WINGER...............are the voices in your head telling you to say that..............

WHO IS WINNING IN THE MIDDLE EAST?????????????????

Because the only thing I see is DEATH ACROSS THE ENTIRE REGION............expanding into Africa..............like an Infectious Disease.........................

FREEDOM CERTAINLY ISN'T WINNING.................

The Only Winners are the Undertakers...............The Middle East and Africa are in FLAMES.
 
You know what? I am tired of arguing with you folks. I could waste my time with a long and drawn out reply, but I will just stop and say this. Your user name of "Challenger" should be changed to "Challenged". As in mentally; or better, like the rest of the pro-pals, you have such a bad case of rectal cranial insertion problem that all you see is the BS.

Quick snippet: To compare the failed Nazi attempt of conquest that lasted at most (according to your own post) 3 years to the struggle that Israel has been going through (and still winning) for the last almost 70 years just shows how Challenged you are.

Just goes to show you need at least 1 superpower covering your arse. Nazi Germany took on all of modern industrialised Europe and it took 3 superpowers to beat her in almost 6 years of constant warfare. Zionist Isreal, in comparison, has had to mobilise to anything approaching that level only 4 times in 70 years and waged aggressive war on three of those occasions against disorganised and/or unprepared enemies. The rest of the time Israel has had to contend against an oppressed and fractured indigenous people, armed with a tiny, tiny, fraction of the weaponry Zionist Isreal possesses, defending it's right to exist. The fact they're still there fighting, after 70 years is a "victory" in itself.

Throw around as many insults as you like, it changes nothing, just demonstrates the fact you know deep down that I'm right, and that frightens you and your ilk.

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
LOL

The Arab League that ATTACKED ISRAEL to begin with was a force from the entire Middle East.

In the 1967 War Egypt and Syria were massed on their borders and outnumbered the Israeli's 4 to one provided for them by the Russians................

and in 1971 Egypt started the attack again armed with Russian Equipment, and again outnumbering the Israeli's...............

On all occasions the Israeli's were outnumbered and Won the day. Not only did they win, in the last Two, but they kicked the living hell out of them with fewer numbers.

Your distortion of history is typical.

I find the "distorting of history" accusation amusing coming from someone who clearly toes the Zionist Hasbara line. Zionists have distorted history for decades until in a moment of hubris, complacency or just incompetance, the Government released all the 1948 archives to the public, allowing Historians to finally be able to get at the truth. It's no accident, they've not done so for the 1956, 1967, or 1973 wars.

The truth then:

The neighbouring Arab forces invaded Palestine in 1948 ostensibly to prevent further ethnic cleansing by the Zionists. Abdullah of Jordan, had already made a deal with the Zionists to occupy Jerusalem and the Palestinian area subsequently known as the West Bank. Syria and Iraq invaded the northernmost area of the West bank more to prevent the Jordanians achieving their aims, than any intent to destroy the newly declared state. Lebanon was sympathetic to the Zionists at the time and only made a token gesture of "attacking" before subsequently pulling back and taking no further part in any operations. Syrian and Egyptian forces did cross into areas that the Zionists declared sovereignty over, but lacked the equipment and ammunition (not to mention training and experience) needed to have any effect. If I recall correctly, the Syrians were held back by two home made artillery pieces and the egyptians were stopped by battle hardened Jewish veterans of Stalingrad, defending one of their settlements. The egyptian force contained various contingents of "volunteers" from other Muslim countries but they were less than useless and more a burden than a help to the Egyptians.

The Arabs were under an arms embargo and were unable to resupply their forces, never having expected to have to actually go to war. The Zionists, while under the same embargo, had been preparing for war for years beforehand and basically ignored the embargo, import modern weapons and equipment via the Soviets and their satellite regimes in Eastern Europe after the british had left. In 1948 the Zionist forces outnumbered the combined arab forces in theatre, and once properly equipped, were easily able to launch an aggressive war of conquest.

I don't have time now to debunk the other conflicts but really, you need to read some objective and scholarly works and not just regurgitate Zionist hasbara historiography. Oh, did you mean 1973, when you wrote 1971?
DEBUNK.................LOL

You mean LIE your little ass off.

Throw around as many insults as you like, it changes nothing, just demonstrates the fact you know deep down that I'm right, and that frightens you and your ilk.

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Aka your twisted anti Semite sites are the truth..................LOL.................

Hardly.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom