Jan 6 Committee SUBORNED PERJURY.. Stunning Information of Closed-Door Testimony Revealed.

[SeaMajor7]

Sure, Q NUT.
On your second pitcher of orange Kool-Aid this morning.

View attachment 666907

You are embarrassing yourself at this point.

I've got work to do, so piss off. I'll check back later.

 

[Independentthinker]

The Jan 6 Commission has realsed the sounds of Trump grabbing the steering wheel, and attackng the two secret service agents:





Among all his other achievements......Trump is a martial arts expert.

Oh shit! Now I understand why the left are in favor of pressing criminal charges.

 

[Smokin' OP]

You're the imbecile who decried education:

You're the moron who thinks I do.

“I don't need a book to tell me how to think, retards do.”
A Win For Originalism…And America post 29

As you posted books of political OPINIONS?
Not factual.

I always appreciate when the most ignorant admit....or, in your case, brag about how ignorant they are.

Glad you appreciate.................yourself,
IT SHOWS.

All of your posts are to be viewed through the prism of your confession.

All your post are to be viewed through the prism of delusion.
BECAUSE.....................You're delusional.

 

[jc456]

It's a hearing, not court.

So, let them, Q NUT.
Why AREN'T these traitors testifying?

now see, you are very confused, the statement was let the conservatives Jordan and whoever the other two Republicans on the committee and let them question the witnesses that have testified. See, that's what's called cross examination. You don't even know the terminology of our court systems.

 

[forkup]

OK, OK......stop begging......here's your lesson in political history:


Let's review what you missed going to government school:

I suppose it is a lack of creativity, not just honesty, that your sort simply copies their forebears.


First, they took a page from earlier socialists, the National Socialist German Worker's Party, who burned down their capitol and said the other side did it....

The True Story of the Reichstag Fire and the Nazi Rise to ...​

https://www.smithsonianmag.com › history › true-story...
— Where there's smoke, there's fire, and where there's fire, conspiracy theories are sure to follow. At least, that's what happened in Germany on ...


The exact story of Jan6....





And their other cousins.....who tried political enemies on fake charges.

Great Purge​

Soviet history
Print Cite Share Feedback

Alternate titles: purge trials
By The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica • Edit History

---

Joseph Stalin
See all media
Date: August 1936 - March 13, 1938Location: Moscow RussiaKey People: Lev Kamenev Karl Radek Aleksey Ivanovich Rykov Leon Trotsky Genrikh Grigoryevich Yagoda...(Show more)
See all related content →
Summary

Read a brief summary of this topic​

Great Purge, also called purge trials, three widely publicized show trials and a series of closed, unpublicized trials held in the Soviet Union during the late 1930s, in which many prominent Old Bolsheviks were found guilty of treason and executed or imprisoned. All the evidence presented in court was derived from preliminary examinations of the defendants and from their confessions. It was subsequently established that the accused were innocent, that the cases were fabricated by the secret police (NKVD), and that the confessions were made under pressure of intensive torture and intimidation.
The trials successfully eliminated the major real and potential political rivals and critics of Joseph Stalin. The trials were the public aspect of the widespread purge that sent millions of alleged “enemies of the people” to prison camps in the 1930s.

READ MORE ....






Luckily they both had ooodles of brain dead adherents.....you know.....like you.





Have you ever read any history???????


Have you ever read a book???



Book: a written or printed work consisting of pages glued or sewn together along one side and bound in covers.

He was thinking of you.





BTW.....who'd you vote for?

Lol, you are a long-winded political hack who apparently is of the opinion that boring to death your adversary is a debating tactic.

Trying to tie the great purge to this committee is an egregious bit of hyperbole. One that only works if your mind is both dumb and completely devoid of historical context. So I suggest you copy-paste another one of your little diatribes and find someone else.

 

[jc456]

A mea culpa's first. You are right the simple fact of the vote of the certification shouldn't have mattered. On the other hand from your article.

“With respect for the integrity of the investigation, with an insistence on the truth and with concern about statements made and actions taken by these Members, I must reject the recommendations of Representatives Banks and Jordan to the Select Committee,”

Meaning Pelosi rejected not purely on their voting but also on their conduct.

And again testimony since has made it clear that this was the right decision.

It still doesn't answer why you feel they couldn't have simply been replaced by other congresspeople? And more importantly. If you feel Pelosi was to conflicted

WHY NOT TAKE PELOSI UP ON HER ORIGINAL OFFER, OF A NON-POLITICAL COMMISSION?

Still waiting for a valid reason?

what's peloser afraid of is the actual question. Why does it matter who is on the committee from the other side, it's our side to decide who is the questioner. See you want that controlled. That is classic kangaroo.

 

[jc456]

Lol, you are a long-winded political hack who apparently is of the opinion that boring to death your adversary is a debating tactic.

Trying to tie the great purge to this committee is an egregious bit of hyperbole. One that only works if your mind is both dumb and completely devoid of historical context. So I suggest you copy-paste another one of your little diatribes and find someone else.

and you are a long winded political hack. now what? glad we got the incidentals out of the way. Now start debating or shut up.

 

[Nostra]

It's a committee.. a hearing.. Not a trial.

Is that why they can lie and make up "evidence"?

 

[jc456]

Sure, Q NUT.
On your second pitcher of orange Kool-Aid this morning.

View attachment 666907

still projecting.

 

[jc456]

Is that why they can lie and make up "evidence"?

and control the questioners. If it's not a trial, then why are we here?

 

[Nostra]

This is a no-win situation for the DOJ. Indict him, and he'll probably walk with a hung jury. Any jury will have at least one cult member.

Don't indict him, and you're letting him and anyone else fully get away with it. You have to indict, even though the odds are against you.

What an ugly period in our history. A political and cultural cult of personality around one terribly weak and damaged child. Incredible.

You have all kinds of excuses for coming up empty, huh?

 

[wamose]

If and when the Republicans retake Congress, the Democrats who knowingly suborned perjury should be brought up on impeachment charges.

I think all the people responsible for allowing and encouraging this kind of false testimony should be made to reimburse the American taxpayer for the money this bogus investigation has cost us.

 

[Mac1958]

You have all kinds of excuses for coming up empty, huh?

I don't know what that means, but I don't speak jihadi.

 

[jc456]

and control the questioners. If it's not a trial, then why are we here?

And, why does it matter who asks the questions?

 

[jc456]

I don't know what that means, but I don't speak jihadi.

who'd have thunk that?

 

[forkup]

what's peloser afraid of is the actual question. Why does it matter who is on the committee from the other side, it's our side to decide who is the questioner. See you want that controlled. That is classic kangaroo.

You can not be both a subject of an investigation and its investigator. If you guys are so hellbent on trying to claim the standards of a trial apply that should also be a no-brainer.

And again I will ask you as I ask everybody who comes up here and moans that this commission is partisan.

Why did McCarthy reject a commission that purposely tried to get politics out of the investigation completely?

 

[jc456]

You can not be both a subject of an investigation and its investigator. If you guys are so hellbent on trying to claim the standards of a trial apply that should also be a no-brainer.

says who? I can defend myself in court and ask questions of my accusers. you're forked in the head.

Post that statute for us.

 

[dudmuck]

now see, you are very confused, the statement was let the conservatives Jordan and whoever the other two Republicans on the committee and let them question the witnesses that have testified. See, that's what's called cross examination. You don't even know the terminology of our court systems.

Its Mccarthy's fault for failing to seat more legitimate republicans to the committee.
Jordan & Banks wernt legit because they were spreading misinformation.

 

[jc456]

Its Mccarthy's fault for failing to seat more legitimate republicans to the committee.
Jordan & Banks wernt legit because they were spreading misinformation.

what does that matter? Explain your controlled movement. I can ask whoever I want to represent me. If the witnesses are all credible, what's the fear?

 

[forkup]

says who? I can defend myself in court and ask questions of my accusers. you're forked in the head.

No, you can't. That's your lawyer's job. And not for nothing. The analogy would be being the accused and being the prosecutor at the same time.