Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This is a laughable opinion. Pelosi needs to be investigated, yet she is the one who hand pick who could sit on the sham committee.... This was never about getting politics out of it. This was a set up to get Trump by any means necessary. SO, she installed two RINO toilets...Why did McCarthy reject a commission that purposely tried to get politics out of the investigation completely?
Nope, anyone can represent themselves, you don't even know your own constitution. sorry friend. BTW, I choose a lawyer I want anyway if I went there.No, you can't. That's your lawyer's job. And not for nothing. The analogy would be being the accused and being the prosecutor at the same time.
that's being nice.This is a laughable opinion. Pelosi needs to be investigated, yet she is the one who hand pick who could sit on the sham committee.... This was never about getting politics out of it. This was a set up to get Trump by any means necessary. SO, she installed two RINO toilets...
Your lack of logic fails miserably...
JackOfNoTrades was apparently talking out of his ass agian.Link?
You don't know what you are talking about Billy_BobThis is a laughable opinion. Pelosi needs to be investigated, yet she is the one who hand pick who could sit on the sham committee.... This was never about getting politics out of it. This was a set up to get Trump by any means necessary. SO, she installed two RINO toilets...
Your lack of logic fails miserably...
www.theguardian.com
As a retired LEO (Law Enforcement Officer) I can assure you I am not the one with a functioning brain problem.. I did investigations so I know a hell of a lot more than you..You don't know what you are talking about Billy_Bob
Kevin McCarthy rejects bipartisan plan for 9/11-style Capitol attack commission
House Republican leader accuses Nancy Pelosi of playing ‘political games’ over 9/11-style panel by which he could be called as a witness
Who gives a fuck what some libtard hack on the Clown Show Committee bloviates?Aww, poor baby. Ignore what the committee member said. That'll prove something.
I would love to see that. Maybe Pelosi et al will think twice before running a witch-hunt. It would be similar to making the plaintiff who brings a frivolous lawsuit pay the court courts.I think all the people responsible for allowing and encouraging this kind of false testimony should be made to reimburse the American taxpayer for the money this bogus investigation has cost us.
More Trump/NRA posters to put up.You are embarrassing yourself at this point.
I've got work to do, so piss off. I'll check back later.
I would settle for making these people chargeable for criminal acts done on the floor of the house. The speech protections only protect you IF they are done in good faith. The current laws prohibit us from holding these people responsible for criminal acts, such as suborning perjury. They are currently using the law to protect one from political prosecution to commit that crime. That is what is wrong here.I would love to see that. Maybe Pelosi et al will think twice before running a witch-hunt. It would be similar to making the plaintiff who brings a frivolous lawsuit pay the court courts.
Lol, you are a long-winded political hack who apparently is of the opinion that boring to death your adversary is a debating tactic.
Trying to tie the great purge to this committee is an egregious bit of hyperbole. One that only works if your mind is both dumb and completely devoid of historical context. So I suggest you copy-paste another one of your little diatribes and find someone else.
orangeman bad. Why do you care, has no impact for Canada?Why would the Committee promote a story that they knew wasn't true?
60 affidavits and 60 judges refusing to hear the evidence. Seems odd huh?No.
If Trump had evidence of voter fraud, why hasn't he produced it?
Don't you find that rather odd?
No, they had to demonstrate loyalty to the Pelosi narrative, and vow not to investigate her.It's kind of hard to cross-examine if you refuse to attend the proceeding in my opinion. And again they were allowed. They just HAD TO SHOW UP. Blame McCarty.
you don't even know what cross examination even is. The Agents don't cross examine, Jordan would cross examine, and Peloser can't have that because when one needs a lie, one can't have someone exposing the lie.It's kind of hard to cross-examine if you refuse to attend the proceeding in my opinion. And again they were allowed. They just HAD TO SHOW UP. Blame McCarty.
They heard it.60 affidavits and 60 judges refusing to hear the evidence. Seems odd huh?
because no one could prove the effort as a kangaroo court in public.No, they had to demonstrate loyalty to the Pelosi narrative, and vow not to investigate her.
nope, never read in any affidavit, each case was rejected before any documents were allowed in.They heard it.
When it's RWNJ BS.
Lack of standing, means, not a scintilla of fact.
They laughed, even the RW judges, laughed.
www.politifact.com
Of course, they have, on Tuckers "court".Your talking points have been shown lies... Funny how you cannot grasp that fact.
