Jan 6 Committee SUBORNED PERJURY.. Stunning Information of Closed-Door Testimony Revealed.

[Nostra]

Yes.
A meeting took place at Trump Tower in New York City on June 9, 2016, between three senior members of the 2016 Trump campaign – Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner, and Paul Manafort – and at least five other people, including Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya.

The meeting was arranged by publicist and long-time Trump acquaintance Rob Goldstone on behalf of his client, Russian singer-songwriter Emin Agalarov.
The meeting was first disclosed to U.S. government officials in April 2017, when Kushner filed a revised version of his security clearance form.

Donald Trump Jr. made several misleading statements about the meeting.] He initially told the press that the meeting was held to discuss adoptions of Russian children by Americans.

On July 8, 2017, after news reports stated that Trump Jr. knew the meeting was political, he admitted in a tweet that he had agreed to the meeting with the understanding that he would receive information damaging to Hillary Clinton, and that he was conducting opposition research.

When The New York Times was about to report on email exchanges between Goldstone and Trump Jr., Trump Jr. himself published the emails.
In early July 2017, it was reported that President Donald Trump himself drafted Trump Jr.'s initial misleading statement.

The report was later confirmed by the president's attorneys. In July 2018, the president denied knowledge of the meeting.

And you believed Barr's "summary"?

President Donald Trump claimed “complete and total exoneration” on Sunday after Attorney General William Barr released a summary of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report on his Russia investigation.

Just like Trump.

Hey Stupid, RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA has been debunked.

 

[PoliticalChic]

There are Republicans on the committee.

And everyone testifying against Trump are Republicans.

And a congressional committee isn’t a courtroom. You don’t get to cross examine.

But don’t worry. The Republicans that get indicted, including Trump, will get to cross examine witnesses at their trials.

Why couldn't pro-Trump reps be allowed by the Wehrmacht......er, Democrats?


Why no cross-examinations????


What are you Nazis afraid of????





At what age did you give up your integrity????

 

[Nostra]

I struck you out on 1 pitch.

Impossible, IQ2.

Ever watch a baseball game, Simp?

 

[PoliticalChic]

I don't change my position according to what benefits me. I leave that to people who have no intellectual honesty, as I noticed most people I talk to here suffer from.

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism,

socialism,

infanticide,

opposition to free speech,

standing with criminals and felons rather than law-abiding citizens

substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry,

support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists,

accepting payment from Communist China for future considerations,

and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.

Now......which is your favorite?

 

[forkup]

Why couldn't pro-Trump reps be allowed by the Wehrmacht......er, Democrats?


Why no cross-examinations????


What are you Nazis afraid of????

It's kind of hard to cross-examine if you refuse to attend the proceeding in my opinion. And again they were allowed. They just HAD TO SHOW UP. Blame McCarty.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Is Tucker going to testify?
He knows so much about "Stalinist".

The subverted morons like yourself are completely blind to reality. You can't see how you've been pumped full of un-American HATE your whole life, and you lapped it all up.

Your admitted ignorance of what Stalinist Show Trials were is a perfect example of why you should educate yourself on the very thing that your precious commie committee is doing.

Yuri Bezmenov warned us about YOU brainwashed people. The Marxists have been infiltrating our edu, media, and governance since the 1930's, and you are Exhibit A of the results.

Just another demented avenger subverted demoralized zombie.

Get well soon.

 

[Independentthinker]

Dan Bongino, Ex-Secret Service Agent has gained information from the committee and from the witnesses who previously testified, under oath, that the Hutchinson testimony is provably false. What is stunning is they had this evidence, yet went with the story anyway. They knew it was false.

Doesn't stun me at all. This is what happens in kangaroo courts. In any event, there was nothing really stunning at all about her hearsay testimony anyway. Trump grabbed for the steering wheel because he wanted to exercise his rights as a citizen to go where he wanted to go? So what? Trump wanted to allow armed protesters in more easily because he wasn't afraid? Well, Trump was right! Protesters did not use guns during their protests.

 

[Billy_Bob]

There are Republicans on the committee.

And everyone testifying against Trump are Republicans.

And a congressional committee isn’t a courtroom. You don’t get to cross examine.

But don’t worry. The Republicans that get indicted, including Trump, will get to cross examine witnesses at their trials.

LOL.... DISGRUNTELED REPUBLICANS. People who were fired or are never Trumpers and hate him because he is a threat to the SWAMP, they are a part of.

According to House Rules, the minority gets to choose who sits on this committee, Nancy threw those people off and installed two never Trumpers who hate Trump.

This is a partisan shit stain... NO one who would actually investigate Pelosi's failures or why she reduced security posture which allowed this to happen.

This is a partisan shit stain for a show. Now we find out that the committee KNEW that the testimony they were pushing was FALSE but claimed it was "credible". Why would they do this? This is known as SUBORNING PURJERY. We now have the evidence to prove that they knew.

You left tards have just had this blow up in your face.. Nothing this committee has done is credible.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Hey Stupid, RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA has been debunked.

They just aren't smart enough to pivot even when their masters have given up that lie and moved on to another.


BTW....
The Clinton associated GPS Fusion sent a Russian woman to Trump's son supposedly with dirt on Hillary.....as if there wasn't enough available......and he found out that what she wanted was to talk about Russian adoptions.

"Russian lawyer who met with Donald Trump Jr linked to investigation group behind salacious Steele Dossier
Jul 10, 2017 - Lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya has denied working for the Russian ... that the person who sought the meeting is associated with Fusion GPS, ...
...the person who sought the meeting is associated with Fusion GPS, a firm which according to public reports, was retained by Democratic operatives...."
Russian lawyer who met with Donald Trump Jr linked to investigation group behind salacious Steele Dossier



Now....read this slowly: if the Trump campaign was aligned with Putin.....why would they need to have a meeting with this unknown woman????

 

[PoliticalChic]

It's kind of hard to cross-examine if you refuse to attend the proceeding in my opinion. And again they were allowed. They just HAD TO SHOW UP. Blame McCarty.

Why couldn't your "witnesses" be crossexamined?


Maybe this is why:


a. Who did a better job with the economy, Trump or the Democrats?



b. Who was better containing the southern border, Trump or the Democrats?



c. Who contained inflation better, Trump or the Democrats?



d. When was there more peace in the world, under Trump or under the Democrat?



e. When did we have better gas prices, under Trump or under the Democrats?



f. Where did we get the truth about Russian Collusion, from Trump or from the Democrats?



g. Who provided the Taliban with over $30 billion in weapons, Trump or the Democrats?



h. Who, contrary to the Constitution, allowed courts and attorneys general to alter the menthods of elections, Trump or the Democrats?



i. Who is in favor of censorship of views they don't like, Trump or the Democrats???



j. Who insistes on nuclear-arming the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism, Trump or the Democrats?




It's the reason for that fake Show Trial.

 

[PoliticalChic]

LOL.... DISGRUNTELED REPUBLICANS. People who were fired or are never Trumpers and hate him because he is a threat to the SWAMP, they are a part of.

According to House Rules, the minority gets to choose who sits on this committee, Nancy threw those people off and installed two never Trumpers who hate Trump.

This is a partisan shit stain... NO one who would actually investigate Pelosi's failures or why she reduced security posture which allowed this to happen.

This is a partisan shit stain for a show. Now we find out that the committee KNEW that the testimony they were pushing was FALSE but claimed it was "credible". Why would they do this? This is known as SUBORNING PURJERY. We now have the evidence to prove that they knew.

You left tards have just had this blow up in your face.. Nothing this committee has done is credible.

Even that moron knows it.

 

[j-mac]

They were allowed. Pelosi objected to 2 and only 2. The 2 who've now come up as having asked for pardons. There was nothing stopping Mccharty from replacing them with 2 other Pro-Trump Congressmen.

That's a hoot....in a Hill article at the time when this happened...

"
Jordan and Banks were part of a group of five GOP lawmakers nominated by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) to serve on the 13-member select committee. But the language of the resolution gave Pelosi veto power over the Republican selections.

Pelosi said she will accept the other three GOP selections: Reps. Rodney Davis (Ill.), Kelly Armstrong (N.D.) and Troy Nehls (Texas). ..."

snip

"
Leading up to the attack, a majority of House Republicans had signed on to a lawsuit challenging Biden’s victory, essentially endorsing Trump’s false claims that the election was “stolen,” or tainted by rampant voter fraud. And after the siege, 139 Republicans voted to overturn the results in Arizona, Pennsylvania or both.

Pelosi on Tuesday had said that those votes would not be a factor as she weighed whether to seat McCarthy’s selections on the select committee. Indeed, Nehls, a former sheriff who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, also voted to overturn Biden’s victory in both Arizona and Pennsylvania. Nehls called the Jan. 6 riot “criminal” and “un-American.”

snip

"Both Jordan and Banks have said in recent days that they were hoping to use their positions on the select committee to investigate what Pelosi knew about the security threat ahead of the violence."

Pelosi rejects Jordan, Banks for Jan. 6 committee

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Wednesday rejected two of the Republican picks — Reps. Jim Jordan (Ohio) and Jim Banks (Ind.) — for the Jan. 6 select committee. Both GOP lawmakers are staunch al…

thehill.com

So, I see what's going on here...Pelosi had NO objection to a republican appointee who publicly called the riot on 1/6 "anti American", but a Congressmember that vowed to delve into HER actions on 1/6, well we can't have that can we...This is about sinking Trump after all....Right?

 

[forkup]

Why couldn't your "witnesses" be crossexamined?

I do not care how many different ways you ask the question. Or what tale you contrive in your own head for it.

There is one reason and one reason only why there are no Pro-Trump people on the commission. It's because McCarty told them not to.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Doesn't stun me at all. This is what happens in kangaroo courts. In any event, there was nothing really stunning at all about her hearsay testimony anyway. Trump grabbed for the steering wheel because he wanted to exercise his rights as a citizen to go where he wanted to go? So what? Trump wanted to allow armed protesters in more easily because he wasn't afraid? Well, Trump was right! Protesters did not use guns during their protests.

The Jan 6 Commission has realsed the sounds of Trump grabbing the steering wheel, and attackng the two secret service agents:




Among all his other achievements......Trump is a martial arts expert.

 

[jc456]

I do not care how many different ways you ask the question. Or what tale you contrive in your own head for it.

There is one reason and one reason only why there are no Pro-Trump people on the commission. It's because McCarty told them not to.

post that link then.

 

[Smokin' OP]

Why couldn't pro-Trump reps be allowed by the Wehrmacht......er, Democrats?


Why no cross-examinations????

It's a hearing, not court.

What are you Nazis afraid of????

So, let them, Q NUT.
Why AREN'T these traitors testifying?

 

[PoliticalChic]

I do not care how many different ways you ask the question. Or what tale you contrive in your own head for it.

There is one reason and one reason only why there are no Pro-Trump people on the commission. It's because McCarty told them not to.

OK, OK......stop begging......here's your lesson in political history:


Let's review what you missed going to government school:

I suppose it is a lack of creativity, not just honesty, that your sort simply copies their forebears.


First, they took a page from earlier socialists, the National Socialist German Worker's Party, who burned down their capitol and said the other side did it....

The True Story of the Reichstag Fire and the Nazi Rise to ...​

https://www.smithsonianmag.com › history › true-story...
— Where there's smoke, there's fire, and where there's fire, conspiracy theories are sure to follow. At least, that's what happened in Germany on ...


The exact story of Jan6....





And their other cousins.....who tried political enemies on fake charges.

Great Purge​

Soviet history
Print Cite Share Feedback

Alternate titles: purge trials
By The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica • Edit History

---

Joseph Stalin
See all media
Date: August 1936 - March 13, 1938Location: Moscow RussiaKey People: Lev Kamenev Karl Radek Aleksey Ivanovich Rykov Leon Trotsky Genrikh Grigoryevich Yagoda...(Show more)
See all related content →
Summary

Read a brief summary of this topic​

Great Purge, also called purge trials, three widely publicized show trials and a series of closed, unpublicized trials held in the Soviet Union during the late 1930s, in which many prominent Old Bolsheviks were found guilty of treason and executed or imprisoned. All the evidence presented in court was derived from preliminary examinations of the defendants and from their confessions. It was subsequently established that the accused were innocent, that the cases were fabricated by the secret police (NKVD), and that the confessions were made under pressure of intensive torture and intimidation.
The trials successfully eliminated the major real and potential political rivals and critics of Joseph Stalin. The trials were the public aspect of the widespread purge that sent millions of alleged “enemies of the people” to prison camps in the 1930s.

READ MORE ....






Luckily they both had ooodles of brain dead adherents.....you know.....like you.





Have you ever read any history???????


Have you ever read a book???



Book: a written or printed work consisting of pages glued or sewn together along one side and bound in covers.

He was thinking of you.





BTW.....who'd you vote for?

 

[PoliticalChic]

It's a hearing, not court.

So, let them, Q NUT.
Why AREN'T these traitors testifying?

You're the imbecile who decried education:

“I don't need a book to tell me how to think, retards do.”
A Win For Originalism…And America post 29

I always appreciate when the most ignorant admit....or, in your case, brag about how ignorant they are.



All of your posts are to be viewed through the prism of your confession.

 

[Smokin' OP]

The subverted morons like yourself are completely blind to reality. You can't see how you've been pumped full of un-American HATE your whole life, and you lapped it all up.

Your admitted ignorance of what Stalinist Show Trials were is a perfect example of why you should educate yourself on the very thing that your precious commie committee is doing.

Yuri Bezmenov warned us about YOU brainwashed people. The Marxists have been infiltrating our edu, media, and governance since the 1930's, and you are Exhibit A of the results.

Just another demented avenger subverted demoralized zombie.

Get well soon.

Sure, Q NUT.
On your second pitcher of orange Kool-Aid this morning.

 

[forkup]

That's a hoot....in a Hill article at the time when this happened...

"
Jordan and Banks were part of a group of five GOP lawmakers nominated by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) to serve on the 13-member select committee. But the language of the resolution gave Pelosi veto power over the Republican selections.

Pelosi said she will accept the other three GOP selections: Reps. Rodney Davis (Ill.), Kelly Armstrong (N.D.) and Troy Nehls (Texas). ..."

snip

"
Leading up to the attack, a majority of House Republicans had signed on to a lawsuit challenging Biden’s victory, essentially endorsing Trump’s false claims that the election was “stolen,” or tainted by rampant voter fraud. And after the siege, 139 Republicans voted to overturn the results in Arizona, Pennsylvania or both.

Pelosi on Tuesday had said that those votes would not be a factor as she weighed whether to seat McCarthy’s selections on the select committee. Indeed, Nehls, a former sheriff who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, also voted to overturn Biden’s victory in both Arizona and Pennsylvania. Nehls called the Jan. 6 riot “criminal” and “un-American.”

snip

"Both Jordan and Banks have said in recent days that they were hoping to use their positions on the select committee to investigate what Pelosi knew about the security threat ahead of the violence."

Pelosi rejects Jordan, Banks for Jan. 6 committee

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Wednesday rejected two of the Republican picks — Reps. Jim Jordan (Ohio) and Jim Banks (Ind.) — for the Jan. 6 select committee. Both GOP lawmakers are staunch al…

thehill.com

So, I see what's going on here...Pelosi had NO objection to a republican appointee who publicly called the riot on 1/6 "anti American", but a Congressmember that vowed to delve into HER actions on 1/6, well we can't have that can we...This is about sinking Trump after all....Right?

A mea culpa's first. You are right the simple fact of the vote of the certification shouldn't have mattered. On the other hand from your article.

“With respect for the integrity of the investigation, with an insistence on the truth and with concern about statements made and actions taken by these Members, I must reject the recommendations of Representatives Banks and Jordan to the Select Committee,”

Meaning Pelosi rejected not purely on their voting but also on their conduct.

And again testimony since has made it clear that this was the right decision.

It still doesn't answer why you feel they couldn't have simply been replaced by other congresspeople? And more importantly. If you feel Pelosi was to conflicted

WHY NOT TAKE PELOSI UP ON HER ORIGINAL OFFER, OF A NON-POLITICAL COMMISSION?

Still waiting for a valid reason?