You made no point besides deflecting from Trump's incitement.
You mean Trump's unproven alleged incitement?
Well, he's on record. And so is Jr. And he spent over a week stoking up the "guys" to come to DC. He's finished.
You think it's your place to make a legal judgement concerning anybody's alleged "incitement"? You don't think The President of the US has a right to his Constitutional right to due process? Sad.
He will get his due process in impeachment court....the Senate.
He'll be acquitted unless there's a direct connection between him and the insurrection. If there was any coordination between him, or Jr., and the planners of the "event" he may be toast. I'd prefer the House just hold the impeachment for 100 days or whatever, while letting Biden try and get the econ back on it's feet, and also investigate any role by Trump as quietly as possible. But I realize Biden will have the millstone around the neck of the senate.
But he did directly urge the rioters to march to the capital and fight like hell to stop the vote certification. THAT is his legacy.
No. "Direct connection" is not "incitement" and the fact of an actual insurrection must also be proven. Fat chance.
I don't know where you got your license to practice law, but obviously you failed the evidence course.
The world watched the insurrection on TV. This is a guilty - slam dunk.
Don't know what made you think that you are the world or that the world is a court of law. Seems like the Constitution has something to say about "due process".
I expect Trump would like to pardon all those āpatriotsā who broke into the Capitol.
Based on what? Trump has outright denounced them multiple times, so...
Trump has not denounced the Capital insurrections at all. Not once ever.
Stopped reading right there....
" āI want to be very clear. I unequivocally condemn the violence that we saw last week. Violence and vandalism have absolutely no place in our country, and no place in our movement,ā Trump said in a video posted by the White Houseās official Twitter account."
Clearly Dragonlady is just a liar...
You do know that domestic violence abusers do the same thing.
What's that? lie? probably....Although I wouldn't say that Dragonlady is a domestic abuser, I sure wouldn't want to be married to her....lol
I wasn't talking about Dragonlady, I was talking about Trump gaslighting everyone who isn't hypnotized.
Really? Were you? Then you did a poor job...
Of course I did, wanna know why? Because while it's true that Trump said what you quoted, he didn't make that statement until 24 hours after he unleashed his war hounds on the Capitol and only after he praised them for the job they did (wreaking havoc and enaging in violence that resulted in the death of 5 people) several hours later.
That's what I meant by gaslighting, the crazy making. Doing a bunch of really f-uped crap and then saying something nice or to the contrary afterwards is exactly what domestic violence abusers do when they beat the crap out of their significant other and then blame them for making them behave that way.
Trump is a master manipulator, I've always known this about him and his personalty type but now that the whole world saw how he manipulated his followers into attempting to prevent the election from being certified, there is really no excuse for people to still be enthralled with him the way they are other than they're true believers - true believers in a fabricated incident that didn't occur ("stop the steal").
Last you and I conversed I asked you who you would trust to give you a honest and accurate legal analysis of one of Trump's cases I cited but you never responded. Perhaps instead of relying on anyone else you could attempt the analysis yourself?
Whew...bitter much? Why so upset? You won right? Oh, I know, people donāt all bend the knee and tell you how great it is, so itās a hollow victory....Well, thatās what happens when your victory is not above board....
Me thinks you got into Game of Thrones a little too seriously....lol
I've never seen a single episode of Game of Thrones, nor am I one the walking afflicted, so I have nothing to be bitter or upset about. But you sure seem to be getting awfully thin skinned all of a sudden, taking Trump's loss pretty personally since you appear to be among those whom have alleged that our entire court system - from the state, to the appellate, state supreme and U.S. Supreme court(s), including Trump appointed Republicans judges, are
all part of a conspiracy to deprive him of a election victory. Oh wait, sorry, scratch that - a conspiracy to allow the "theft" of the election
from him after having won it "in a landslide".
And since you all play so fast and loose with the word landslide, let's check the definition just so we all know what we're talking about here:
noun Also called, especially British, landĀ·slip [land-slip] (for defs. 1, 2).
the downward falling or
sliding of a mass of soil, detritus, or rock on or from a steep slope.
the mass itself. (lol)
an election in which a particular victorious candidate or party receives an overwhelming mass or majority of votes: the 1936 landslide for Roosevelt.
any overwhelming victory: She won the contest by a landslide.
verb (used without object), landĀ·slid, landĀ·slid or landĀ·slidĀ·den, landĀ·slidĀ·ing.
to come down in or as in a landslide.
to win an election by an overwhelming majority.
So, are you up to doing the legal analysis yourself or are you gonna let all of it just slide because it requires too much effort? Or do you already know and understand it all?