So you support the Dobbs decision. Cool.
What’s my ilk? Post the quote where I’ve said this issue shouldn’t be decided democratically.
And thus the pathetic wannabe fires his last shot, hoping desperately it will shut up the opposition. Sadly, he don't know me too good.
A human fetus, and thus human.
A human baby, and thus human.
No, that's a rhetorical definition, not a scientific one.
No, that's a rhetorical definition, not a scientific one.
Again with the religion. You just don't like science all that much, do you? You're still denying it, after all.
An ass we all loathe:" Tell me, are you going to move your debating skills into the adult realm or continue to operate on a 10-year-old's level?"
A human fetus, and thus human.
And again with the ignorance
How many fetuses inside a human female end up as a giraffe or anything other than a human baby. Fetus is just the name of a stage of development. Its no different than baby, toddler, child, preteen, teenager, young adult, adult, middle aged, elderly etc etc.
And what KIND of fetus is growing inside a human female when she is pregnant, zebra or yeti? You still won't say which you believe, only that there is no human in there.
You don't understand. There is something other than human growing inside a pregnant human female, apparently either a zebra or a yeti. That thing can only become human when the Lawyer Fairy sprinkles his magic dust on him/her after they are born.
Well, you're certainly keeping it simple, and wrong, so simple you aren't showing indications of more complex intellectual rigor. You won't even specify what exactly you think is growing inside a pregnant woman. Maybe it's too difficult a choice for you?
Ahh yes the magical journey though the birth canal. The 2.5 inch trek that confers personhood.
It's a fetus.
A human fetus is a fetus
Interesting, you state 40 years old. Is that when you believe someone becomes human? Face it, your rhetoric falls short. You want to say a fetus is not a human being, but claim that an infant is. You also want to claim an adolescent is. Those are all terms that refer to a human being at various stages of development. You simply want to set humanity at an arbitrary stage of development to support your political bias, and in so doing you deny science.
I've responded to that many times.
Human is a species.
The mental gymnastics they go through to convince themselves there's no moral issue to ending an innocent , but inconvenient, human life are.. well.. . remarkable.
Wow, even after having your mental vacuity pointed out to you in humiliating detail, you insist on doubling down. Very sad. Obviously, you don't know what a human being is because you arbitrarily set the boundary at birth, when in actuality there is a human being developing in that uterus. You want to say they're not alive before birth? Tell a heavily pregnant woman that there's nothing alive in her. Tell us how it went from your hospital bed.
It does make you wonder. The most innocent and vulnerable of all human life.
40 years old is definitely human.
