Cecilie1200
Diamond Member
More regulation is needed and more competition between insurersFirst off, for those that know me...I am a conservative.
I do ask the question in sincerity.
Last year with health premiums, and healthcare bills, my wife and I spent $7,040 for the two of us.
Then add in the employers portion of premium and that totals up to roughly $11,000.
Even with that, we are well below the average cost the average American pays.
So, would I pay out say... $600 a month in taxes, and my employer in lieu of paying premiums, pay another $400 a month? Instead of paying an insurer?
Yes, yes I would.
But only if the care was equally as good.
And would it be?
How would we, as a nation, pay for the bums and lazy asses who won't work?
Should a "health tax" be income specific? So someone who makes $250,000 a year would pay a great deal more than a $50,000 a year person? Would that work?
One thing is for certain. The current system is not working well. We are paying more and more and more to insurers who are raising deductibles and increasing premiums while covering less.
What fix is there?
I agree.
you gonna pay for everyone, right?
No,insurers need to have less control over the health care system.
Insurers had adjusted very well to the ACA after 3 years and were even giving new benefits. This Administration is so vindictive they only want to destroy. The Republican Congress has had years to come up with a plan. They have zilch except to destroy what protections people have. They could have worked on fixing problems but they only tear down.
"Insurers need to have less control over health care. That's why we need a system that gives them even more control!"
Brilliant.
