OK... check out this then: for a hospital in Texas and what they charged Medicare...
CT Scan for 4,456 patients -- average charge: $4,819 -- Average cost: $52
All information in this report is taken from the Medicare Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) Limited Data Set which is updated annually by CMS based on the calendar year. The file includes billing data for 100% of all Medicare fee-for-service claims for hospital outpatient services during the twelve months ending December 31. The report is based on the most recent period available and is consistent with CMS cell size suppression policy.
Services are defined based on the revenue code for a line item. Averages are based on units of service (i.e. the number of units of items or services delivered).
- Number Patient Claims - the total number of claims for the service.
- Units of Service - the number of units of the items or services delivered. (One claim may have multiple units of service for an item or service.)
- Average Charge - the total charges (covered and non-covered) for all accommodations and services (related to the revenue code) for a billing period before reduction for the deductible and coinsurance amounts and before an adjustment for the cost of services provided.
- Average Cost - Charges adjusted to cost using the hospital's specific cost center cost-to-charge ratio. This calculation is done by CMS and included with OPPS claims data. (Details of the calculation are not provided by CMS.)
- Average Payment - The computed OPPS payment for a line item based on the payment APC. The "payment APC" refers to total payment, including deductible, coinsurance, and program payment.
- Service Mix Index (SMI) - Each APC has a relative weight assigned by CMS. The Service Mix Index is the average relative weight of the procedures billed for a service (e.g. the average relative weight of all surgical procedures performed).
the hospitals play that game for tax purposes, they create huge charges and then accept much less from insurance or medicare and claim the rest as a business loss for tax purposes. Its a game and they have been doing it for years.
a few years ago my wife had a brain aneurysm (from which she recovered completely after amazing surgery). he hospital bill was over 250K plus 60K for the brain surgeon and his team. Insurance (medicare advantage) paid 80K total and the hospital and doctor never asked us for more than our deductible of 2K. I am quite sure that their tax returns will show losses on this patient of 190K or more.
Same procedure is used by the drug companies. that is what needs to be fixed, not create some huge inefficient government agency that would ruin the best medical system in the history of the world.
Huge government agencies are the most efficient at things like administering health care because they have the most negotiating clout.
Works in every country in the world.
Medicare and VA show less than a 10% administration overhead, while private insurance companies are more like 40%.
We do not have the best health care in the world.
Actually we are rated 37, about the lowest of all the developed nations.
World Health Organization's Ranking of the World's Health Systems
Once again your lack of really understanding how the world works is appalling!
A) Medicare doesn't process ONE SINGLE CLAIM! For profit insurance companies contract with Medicare and pay all the claims.
B) The average insurance company nets AFTER paying claims 20%! NOT 40%
C) STATE laws require these insurance companies to have reserves that are paid from "PROFITS" or they can't sell insurance. As a result idiots like Obama in Obamacare
said insurance companies must pay out 85% of all premiums. This left NOTHING for profits after 15% deducted for administration. HENCE the reason companies dropped ACA!
D) There are NO countries in the world where govt. run health care are "efficient". Canadians come to the USA for health care! FACT!
The Fraser Institute, a
Canadian public policy think tank, estimates that 52,513
Canadians received non-emergency
medical treatment in the
U.S. and other countries in 2014, a 25 percent jump from the roughly 41,838 who sought medical care abroad the previous year.Aug 3, 2016
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-co...dians-increasingly-come-to-us-for-health-care
E) Ultimately any more facts I share with you is useless as you have absolutely NO common sense! Zero.
Not one of your inane comments had any substantiation. YOU are guessing and are wrong on all counts.
FACTS prove how totally and truly ignorant you are as to how the REAL world works. Please read for once FACTS ...not fiction!
Not at all true.
A) I am on Medicare now, and there is absolutely no private insurance company involved.
I fill out Medicare forms myself.
And it would no matter if they did subcontract as long as they get the charges down as low as they do.
B) You are forgetting that insurance companies charge you 30 years or so ahead of when they actually normally start making payments back out, on average. So you either have to include the profit they make borrowing your money, or include the interest they should be paying on the loan we are forced to give them. Statisticians estimate it is actually over 40% they are making off our misery.
C) Not making as much profit from ACA only means insurance companies are greedy. There is more than enough profit under ACA. But mandating insurance is inherently illegal and should be stopped.
D) Every country in the world runs more efficient health care than the US, which is why most people leave the US for health care.
The ONLY ones that come to the US for health care are the very top wealthy, because there is no waiting here for the wealthy, and we do have the very best, highest paid, specialists. If you want a pacemaker, you go to France. If you want plastic surgery, you go to Thailand. Cancer goes to Mexico. Canada is good for most things. Medical tourism out is far higher than it is into the US, by about a factor of 100 or so.
{...
Many surgery procedures performed in medical tourism destinations cost a fraction of the price they do in other countries. For example, in the United States, a liver transplant that may cost $300,000 USD, would generally cost about $91,000 USD in Taiwan.
[8]
...
In First World countries such as the United States, medical tourism has large growth prospects and potentially destabilizing implications. A forecast by
Deloitte Consulting published in August 2008 projected that medical tourism originating in the US could jump by a factor of ten over the next decade. An estimated 750,000 Americans went abroad for health care in 2007, and the report estimated that 1.5 million would seek health care outside the US in 2008. The growth in medical tourism has the potential to cost US health care providers billions of dollars in lost revenue.
...}
Medical tourism - Wikipedia
Face it, medical care in the US really, really sucks.