Are Muslims going to be extinct because they marry their cousins ?
Well, it sure doesn't improve the gene pool. But this is common among Jews too, isn't it?
NO not in the general population
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Are Muslims going to be extinct because they marry their cousins ?
Well, it sure doesn't improve the gene pool. But this is common among Jews too, isn't it?
Like these Christians?but no longer Jews.
Israel's population seem to pretty much all marry their cousins, so their chances of survival are slim.
LINK ?
CONSANGUINITY AMONG JEWS - JewishEncyclopedia.com
Owing to their dispersion among populations professing creed different from their own, Jews have married ear relatives more frequently than the rest of the world. The marriage of first cousins and even of uncle and niece is quite legal and usual among them
We now enter pure biology, where such breeding is well known to cause genetic defects.
Jewish Genetic Diseases Center of Greater Phoenix
The Jews are trying to cure themselves using genetic screening before marriage, but their long term interbreeding is taking its toll.
The only real cure is to disband the whole Jewish faith, allowing the race to breed with a new gene pool before.
Is this God's final solution to the Jewish problem?
I think Muslims are causing more problems in the world today than Jews, unless you think that dancing in the street by 2 pretty girls and one ugly one is a major world problem.
Why don't we try to discuss the Palestinians, who happen to Christians and Muslims.
At the time of the creation of the Israeli state in 1948, it is estimated that the Christians of Palestine numbered some 350,000. Almost 20 percent of the total population at the time, they constituted a vibrant and ancient community; their forbears had listened to St. Peter in Jerusalem as he preached at the first Pentecost. Yet Zionist doctrine held that Palestine was “a land without a people for a people without a land.” Of the 750,000 Palestinians that were forced from their homes in 1948, some 50,000 were Christians—7 percent of the total number of refugees and 35 percent of the total number of Christians living in Palestine at the time.
In the process of “Judaizing” Palestine, numerous convents, hospices, seminaries, and churches were either destroyed or cleared of their Christian owners and custodians. In one of the most spectacular attacks on a Christian target, on May 17, 1948, the Armenian Orthodox Patriarchate was shelled with about 100 mortar rounds—launched by Zionist forces from the already occupied monastery of the Benedictine Fathers on Mount Zion. The bombardment also damaged St. Jacob’s Convent, the Archangel’s Convent, and their appended churches, their two elementary and seminary schools, as well as their libraries, killing eight people and wounding 120.
Forgotten Christians The American Conservative
One odd thing has come to mind.
Hitler claimed Jews were genetically inferior race; now Jewish scientists seem to be proving his theories correct.
Are Muslims going to be extinct because they marry their cousins ?
Well, it sure doesn't improve the gene pool. But this is common among Jews too, isn't it?
I've never heard of such a thing among Jews.
This is from a Jewish academic site.
"CONSANGUINITY AMONG JEWS:
Owing to their dispersion among populations professing creed different from their own, Jews have married ear relatives more frequently than the rest of the world. The marriage of first cousins and even of uncle and niece is quite legal and usual among them (see Marriage). The limitations on the marriage of those of priestly descent would tend to limit the choice of Cohens to those nearly related to them.The tendency seems to have begun early, since Abraham is represented as having sought a wife for Isaac in his mother's family. In the Middle Ages it is difficult to ascertain how far the Jews tended to marry within their own families; but the Ghirondi family, to which Naḥmanides, Gersonides (who married his first cousin), and Simon Duran belonged, appeared to have married relatives for several generations (Steinschneider, "Cat. Bodl." cols. 2305-2310).
An attempt has been made to ascertain the proportion of first-cousin marriages among English Jews upon the method invented by G. H. Darwin ("Fortnightly Review," July, 1875), based on the number of marriages in which both bride and bride-groom have the same surname. This method gives a proportion of about one-fifth. Judging by this criterion, the percentage of cousin-marriages in the English peerage was 4.50 among the landed gentry, 3.75 in rural districts, 2.25 in London. Applying the same method to English Jews, Jacobs calculated that 7.52 per cent of their marriages were first-cousin marriages. By another method W. Stieda found that there were 23.02 per cent per thousand consanguineous marriages among the Jews of Alsace-Lorraine as compared with 8.97 among Catholics and 1.86 among Protestants ("Die Eheschliessungen in Elsass-Lorhringen," 1872-76, Dorpat, 1878). It would therefore appear that the proportion of first-cousin marriages among Jews is about three times greater than among the non-Jewish population."
CONSANGUINITY AMONG JEWS - JewishEncyclopedia.com
Pakistan has a problem because of their very strange version of Islam.You should look up Muslim countries for that, douchebag, they are among the worst
However most Muslims aren't from Pakistan.
Did you read the entire article or has banging your head five times a day in the rug five times a day dammed those two reaming brains get cells in your empty skull? It wasn't referring only Pakistan. THERE IS A PREFERENCE IN ISLAM FOR MUSLIM ANIMALS LIKE YOU TO MARRY THEIR COUSINS.
I find it hilarious that you accuse Jews of something that is most prevalent in Muslim shitpiles like the one you live in:
"Where do cousins marry? Africa, the Middle East, and South Asia are the most consanguineous regions in the world, largely due to its general acceptance, even preference, in Islam. In India, the Muslim rate of cousin marriage is 22%, with the rate nearly doubling to 40% in Jammu and Kashmir. Pakistan, noted earlier, is the world leader in consanguinity with around 70%; Saudi Arabia is 50+%; Iran and Afghanistan are 30-40%, Iraq 33%, Egypt and Turkey 20+%, and Qatar 54%.Subsaharan Africa is estimated between 35-50%, with Nigeria’s opinion split tribally: Hausas prefer cousin marriage, Yorubas condone it; Igbos ban it."
Jewish Genetic Disease Consortium - Working together to prevent jewish genetic diseasesConsider the source
A Jewish site, intent on trying to put right what Hitler said about Jews.
Is there an Islamic genetic disease consortium seeing as they have the worlds largest incidence of birth defects
The incidence of still births and birth defects amongst muslims is increasing
You are the one who cannot accept the truth.Indeed, when you ask about when Israel acquired its land you feel like a theatrical agent you get so much song and dance.I think they knew darn well what they were doing, read some of Ben Guerin's words. Dead give away.I don't think that the Israelis see it as an occupation P.T..
Man, you are such a liar. You MADE UP the acquiring land pre requisite. You have NEVER proved that it needed to be involved for declaring independence.
So when you don't get the response that you want, you claim that you somehow have the upper hand in the debate.
Do you really have that much of a hard time accepting the truth?
The Lebanese gained independence in Lebanon. The Syrians gained independence in Syria. The Jordanians gained independence in Jordan. And on and on.
The foreign Zionists declared independence in Palestine. Acquiring land is not an issue anywhere else because they gained independence inside their own defined territory as stated in international law. (A state should have a defined territory ~ Montevideo Conference)
Israel is the only one with a problem because it is the only one declaring independence in another defined territory.
Enough. Was your "topic" about others than Jews, you would not have posted anything about that here.Jewish Genetic Disease Consortium - Working together to prevent jewish genetic diseasesConsider the source
A Jewish site, intent on trying to put right what Hitler said about Jews.
Is there an Islamic genetic disease consortium seeing as they have the worlds largest incidence of birth defects
You neglected to comment on how Jews are proving Hitler right, now admitting their gene structure is prone to weaknesses.
Perhaps you could bring yourself to have a go.
However, I don't try to hide there is a problem in some of the silly end of Islam who marry cousins, but this is pretty much limited to places like Pakistan and Bangladesh. There are a few problems over here where village populations have interbred, but these are very rare now.
The greatest problem is a skin deformity, but that's hardly seen any more.
Of course, with the vast Muslim population of the world, even the few localised problems are of little concern when it comes to the big picture, but Israel's rather racist and bigoted outlook forbids relationships outside the 6 million or so inbreeds you have over there.
If a dog was born like that, you'd put it out of its misery.
Jewish Genetic Disease Consortium - Working together to prevent jewish genetic diseasesConsider the source
A Jewish site, intent on trying to put right what Hitler said about Jews.
Is there an Islamic genetic disease consortium seeing as they have the worlds largest incidence of birth defects
You neglected to comment on how Jews are proving Hitler right, now admitting their gene structure is prone to weaknesses.
Perhaps you could bring yourself to have a go.
However, I don't try to hide there is a problem in some of the silly end of Islam who marry cousins, but this is pretty much limited to places like Pakistan and Bangladesh. There are a few problems over here where village populations have interbred, but these are very rare now.
The greatest problem is a skin deformity, but that's hardly seen any more.
Of course, with the vast Muslim population of the world, even the few localised problems are of little concern when it comes to the big picture, but Israel's rather racist and bigoted outlook forbids relationships outside the 6 million or so inbreeds you have over there.
If a dog was born like that, you'd put it out of its misery.
The girl simply lacks of adequate orthodontic treatment.
Like these Christians?LINK ?
CONSANGUINITY AMONG JEWS - JewishEncyclopedia.com
Owing to their dispersion among populations professing creed different from their own, Jews have married ear relatives more frequently than the rest of the world. The marriage of first cousins and even of uncle and niece is quite legal and usual among them
We now enter pure biology, where such breeding is well known to cause genetic defects.
Jewish Genetic Diseases Center of Greater Phoenix
The Jews are trying to cure themselves using genetic screening before marriage, but their long term interbreeding is taking its toll.
The only real cure is to disband the whole Jewish faith, allowing the race to breed with a new gene pool before.
Is this God's final solution to the Jewish problem?
I think Muslims are causing more problems in the world today than Jews, unless you think that dancing in the street by 2 pretty girls and one ugly one is a major world problem.
Why don't we try to discuss the Palestinians, who happen to Christians and Muslims.
At the time of the creation of the Israeli state in 1948, it is estimated that the Christians of Palestine numbered some 350,000. Almost 20 percent of the total population at the time, they constituted a vibrant and ancient community; their forbears had listened to St. Peter in Jerusalem as he preached at the first Pentecost. Yet Zionist doctrine held that Palestine was “a land without a people for a people without a land.” Of the 750,000 Palestinians that were forced from their homes in 1948, some 50,000 were Christians—7 percent of the total number of refugees and 35 percent of the total number of Christians living in Palestine at the time.
In the process of “Judaizing” Palestine, numerous convents, hospices, seminaries, and churches were either destroyed or cleared of their Christian owners and custodians. In one of the most spectacular attacks on a Christian target, on May 17, 1948, the Armenian Orthodox Patriarchate was shelled with about 100 mortar rounds—launched by Zionist forces from the already occupied monastery of the Benedictine Fathers on Mount Zion. The bombardment also damaged St. Jacob’s Convent, the Archangel’s Convent, and their appended churches, their two elementary and seminary schools, as well as their libraries, killing eight people and wounding 120.
Forgotten Christians The American Conservative
Biased source as it makes no mention of the true facts, Try the fact that the aggressive Palestinians were evicted under international law of the time. They could have been executed instead.
You´ve asked her?The girl simply lacks of adequate orthodontic treatment.
But, it's a boy.
Yes, the deformities are that severe.
The incidence of still births and birth defects amongst muslims is increasing
How very interesting.
Perhaps you could provide links, but not the ones to daft anti Islamic sites, or the odd newspaper that quotes them.
Good points but Palestine is the only country where the natives got the boot.You are the one who cannot accept the truth.Indeed, when you ask about when Israel acquired its land you feel like a theatrical agent you get so much song and dance.I think they knew darn well what they were doing, read some of Ben Guerin's words. Dead give away.I don't think that the Israelis see it as an occupation P.T..
Man, you are such a liar. You MADE UP the acquiring land pre requisite. You have NEVER proved that it needed to be involved for declaring independence.
So when you don't get the response that you want, you claim that you somehow have the upper hand in the debate.
Do you really have that much of a hard time accepting the truth?
The Lebanese gained independence in Lebanon. The Syrians gained independence in Syria. The Jordanians gained independence in Jordan. And on and on.
The foreign Zionists declared independence in Palestine. Acquiring land is not an issue anywhere else because they gained independence inside their own defined territory as stated in international law. (A state should have a defined territory ~ Montevideo Conference)
Israel is the only one with a problem because it is the only one declaring independence in another defined territory.
WRONG the Hashemite prince gained Jordan and migrated his own people to the land. The same thing happened in Syria with another Saudi Hashemite prince. So how could they be Syrian or Jordanian when they came from another nation.
Your Montevideo convention does not apply as it has nothing to do with the M.E, it only involves the Americas.
What defined territory is that as none existed before 1948, unless you have a treaty saying otherwise
The girl simply lacks of adequate orthodontic treatment.
But, it's a boy.
Yes, the deformities are that severe.
Like these Christians?CONSANGUINITY AMONG JEWS - JewishEncyclopedia.com
We now enter pure biology, where such breeding is well known to cause genetic defects.
Jewish Genetic Diseases Center of Greater Phoenix
The Jews are trying to cure themselves using genetic screening before marriage, but their long term interbreeding is taking its toll.
The only real cure is to disband the whole Jewish faith, allowing the race to breed with a new gene pool before.
Is this God's final solution to the Jewish problem?
I think Muslims are causing more problems in the world today than Jews, unless you think that dancing in the street by 2 pretty girls and one ugly one is a major world problem.
Why don't we try to discuss the Palestinians, who happen to Christians and Muslims.
At the time of the creation of the Israeli state in 1948, it is estimated that the Christians of Palestine numbered some 350,000. Almost 20 percent of the total population at the time, they constituted a vibrant and ancient community; their forbears had listened to St. Peter in Jerusalem as he preached at the first Pentecost. Yet Zionist doctrine held that Palestine was “a land without a people for a people without a land.” Of the 750,000 Palestinians that were forced from their homes in 1948, some 50,000 were Christians—7 percent of the total number of refugees and 35 percent of the total number of Christians living in Palestine at the time.
In the process of “Judaizing” Palestine, numerous convents, hospices, seminaries, and churches were either destroyed or cleared of their Christian owners and custodians. In one of the most spectacular attacks on a Christian target, on May 17, 1948, the Armenian Orthodox Patriarchate was shelled with about 100 mortar rounds—launched by Zionist forces from the already occupied monastery of the Benedictine Fathers on Mount Zion. The bombardment also damaged St. Jacob’s Convent, the Archangel’s Convent, and their appended churches, their two elementary and seminary schools, as well as their libraries, killing eight people and wounding 120.
Forgotten Christians The American Conservative
Biased source as it makes no mention of the true facts, Try the fact that the aggressive Palestinians were evicted under international law of the time. They could have been executed instead.
Good points but Palestine is the only country where the natives got the boot.You are the one who cannot accept the truth.Indeed, when you ask about when Israel acquired its land you feel like a theatrical agent you get so much song and dance.I think they knew darn well what they were doing, read some of Ben Guerin's words. Dead give away.
Man, you are such a liar. You MADE UP the acquiring land pre requisite. You have NEVER proved that it needed to be involved for declaring independence.
So when you don't get the response that you want, you claim that you somehow have the upper hand in the debate.
Do you really have that much of a hard time accepting the truth?
The Lebanese gained independence in Lebanon. The Syrians gained independence in Syria. The Jordanians gained independence in Jordan. And on and on.
The foreign Zionists declared independence in Palestine. Acquiring land is not an issue anywhere else because they gained independence inside their own defined territory as stated in international law. (A state should have a defined territory ~ Montevideo Conference)
Israel is the only one with a problem because it is the only one declaring independence in another defined territory.
WRONG the Hashemite prince gained Jordan and migrated his own people to the land. The same thing happened in Syria with another Saudi Hashemite prince. So how could they be Syrian or Jordanian when they came from another nation.
Your Montevideo convention does not apply as it has nothing to do with the M.E, it only involves the Americas.
What defined territory is that as none existed before 1948, unless you have a treaty saying otherwise
Try the fact that the aggressive Palestinians were evicted under international law of the time. They could have been executed instead.Like these Christians?I think Muslims are causing more problems in the world today than Jews, unless you think that dancing in the street by 2 pretty girls and one ugly one is a major world problem.
Why don't we try to discuss the Palestinians, who happen to Christians and Muslims.
At the time of the creation of the Israeli state in 1948, it is estimated that the Christians of Palestine numbered some 350,000. Almost 20 percent of the total population at the time, they constituted a vibrant and ancient community; their forbears had listened to St. Peter in Jerusalem as he preached at the first Pentecost. Yet Zionist doctrine held that Palestine was “a land without a people for a people without a land.” Of the 750,000 Palestinians that were forced from their homes in 1948, some 50,000 were Christians—7 percent of the total number of refugees and 35 percent of the total number of Christians living in Palestine at the time.
In the process of “Judaizing” Palestine, numerous convents, hospices, seminaries, and churches were either destroyed or cleared of their Christian owners and custodians. In one of the most spectacular attacks on a Christian target, on May 17, 1948, the Armenian Orthodox Patriarchate was shelled with about 100 mortar rounds—launched by Zionist forces from the already occupied monastery of the Benedictine Fathers on Mount Zion. The bombardment also damaged St. Jacob’s Convent, the Archangel’s Convent, and their appended churches, their two elementary and seminary schools, as well as their libraries, killing eight people and wounding 120.
Forgotten Christians The American Conservative
Biased source as it makes no mention of the true facts, Try the fact that the aggressive Palestinians were evicted under international law of the time. They could have been executed instead.
Link to what ?
Even the Palestinians still in Israel got booted off their land.Good points but Palestine is the only country where the natives got the boot.You are the one who cannot accept the truth.Indeed, when you ask about when Israel acquired its land you feel like a theatrical agent you get so much song and dance.
Man, you are such a liar. You MADE UP the acquiring land pre requisite. You have NEVER proved that it needed to be involved for declaring independence.
So when you don't get the response that you want, you claim that you somehow have the upper hand in the debate.
Do you really have that much of a hard time accepting the truth?
The Lebanese gained independence in Lebanon. The Syrians gained independence in Syria. The Jordanians gained independence in Jordan. And on and on.
The foreign Zionists declared independence in Palestine. Acquiring land is not an issue anywhere else because they gained independence inside their own defined territory as stated in international law. (A state should have a defined territory ~ Montevideo Conference)
Israel is the only one with a problem because it is the only one declaring independence in another defined territory.
WRONG the Hashemite prince gained Jordan and migrated his own people to the land. The same thing happened in Syria with another Saudi Hashemite prince. So how could they be Syrian or Jordanian when they came from another nation.
Your Montevideo convention does not apply as it has nothing to do with the M.E, it only involves the Americas.
What defined territory is that as none existed before 1948, unless you have a treaty saying otherwise
Nope they still live in Palestine, it was the Jews given the boot in 1949 from land they owned.