Arab Genocide campaign on Jews began before reestablished Israel

Um... No.
Um.. Yes.
So any single person represents all of a group? If I show a video of a Jew who says something different, how can they both represent the same group. Do you ever even listen to yourself?
If I say the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor, and you reply, by way of rebuttal, not every Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor, everyone would laugh and tell you to go back out to the playground. This conversation is for adults.
Anyone who disagrees with you lies, it seems. Your ignorance knows no bounds.

No, no, just the liars. That SPLC article is pure lies. I oughta know, because it is about me. But I have been waiting for someone to link to it and call me a name based on it, which you did, so now I have the grounds for a defamation suit. So, in your zeal to be nasty, you did me a big favor. LOL

That's the thing about you people. You simply never can stop.
 
If I say the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor, and you reply, by way of rebuttal, not every Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor, everyone would laugh and tell you to go back out to the playground. This conversation is for adults.
So you would attack everything Japanese today and forever because of Pearl Harbor. In fact, because of Pearl Harbor, you would take a blog post by an American Japanese person a d say it speaks for all Japanese. Good work.
No, no, just the liars. That SPLC article is pure lies. I oughta know, because it is about me. But I have been waiting for someone to link to it and call me a name based on it, which you did, so now I have the grounds for a defamation suit. So, in your zeal to be nasty, you did me a big favor. LOL
You also don't know the law. I do. You want to pursue this you should at least learn the relevant case law. You have a nexis/lexis account?
That's the thing about you people. You simply never can stop.
And you can't learn. You are way out of your league on most every front.
 
So you would attack everything Japanese today and forever because of Pearl Harbor. In fact, because of Pearl Harbor, you would take a blog post by an American Japanese person a d say it speaks for all Japanese. Good work.

You also don't know the law. I do. You want to pursue this you should at least learn the relevant case law. You have a nexis/lexis account?

And you can't learn. You are way out of your league on most every front.
Oh, believe me, I know the case law. But, you are boring and a waste of time. When you answer how the phrase "save alive nothing that breatheth" doesn't mean kill everybody, then maybe I'll reengage.
 
Oh, believe me, I know the case law. But, you are boring and a waste of time. When you answer how the phrase "save alive nothing that breatheth" doesn't mean kill everybody, then maybe I'll reengage.
Ugh -- that translation is middling. The Hebrew phrase is lo techaye kol neshama (that breatheth? lol)
here are some important notes about the phrase:
"The validity of this commandment is limited to the generation Moses is addressing, i.e. the period during which the Israelites will be engaged in fighting the Canaanites in order to settle in the land promised by G-d to their patriarchs, Avraham, Yitzchok, and Yaakov. If members of these tribes had emigrated voluntarily, and at some future date return individually, and even wish to convert to Judaism this is acceptable." (Chizkuni)

[I'll skip what the Nachal Kedumim says about magic and witchcraft]

The Rashbam explains the phrase to mean "However, if they make the first move in approaching you, and express their willingness to become your slaves before the battle is joined you are allowed to let them live."

sorry you don't know how to read large chunks of text but if you started beforehand you would see that this specific verse is speaking only about specific tribes at a specific time and in specific circumstances. Now if you are against the laws of warfare in history then great. But to extrapolate from that and impute actions, motives and understandings to a group (which you know very little about in terms of actual beliefs and behaviors) then you look stupid. Like you do right now.
 
Ugh -- that translation is middling. The Hebrew phrase is lo techaye kol neshama (that breatheth? lol)
here are some important notes about the phrase:
"The validity of this commandment is limited to the generation Moses is addressing, i.e. the period during which the Israelites will be engaged in fighting the Canaanites in order to settle in the land promised by G-d to their patriarchs, Avraham, Yitzchok, and Yaakov. If members of these tribes had emigrated voluntarily, and at some future date return individually, and even wish to convert to Judaism this is acceptable." (Chizkuni)

[I'll skip what the Nachal Kedumim says about magic and witchcraft]

The Rashbam explains the phrase to mean "However, if they make the first move in approaching you, and express their willingness to become your slaves before the battle is joined you are allowed to let them live."

sorry you don't know how to read large chunks of text but if you started beforehand you would see that this specific verse is speaking only about specific tribes at a specific time and in specific circumstances. Now if you are against the laws of warfare in history then great. But to extrapolate from that and impute actions, motives and understandings to a group (which you know very little about in terms of actual beliefs and behaviors) then you look stupid. Like you do right now.
So God was cool with slaughtering innocents if it was at a "different time and place." Nice God, y'all got there. But now God is different (because he changes his laws--call rosends to find out which parts of scripture are still in effect, I guess) and when Netanyahoo and the rabbis and the Christian Zionists use scripture to justify the genocide of the Palestinians, they are being, what? Apostates? Blasphemers? Evil?

Wasn't the monstrous YHWH just speaking of a particular time and place when he said the Jews were the Chosen People? Didn't that only apply so long as they were "observing the statutes and judgments"--i.e. slaughtering their neighbors? Didn't the slaughter-god promise to "turn his face away" if they Jews broke the law, for example, permitted intermarriage between Jews and non-Jews. How do we know? Do we have to wait for you to explain it to us?

See? This is what happens when you worship a psychopath. Ezekiel may have been the most evil person to ever live. Thanks, Jews!

What happened when Nehemiah read the Law to the people in Jerusalem? The people wept. They were enslaved, drawn back into the filthy horrors of the Levites. Now, in 2025, you are still enslaved to the psychopathic wilderness slaughter-god of the hibarus, thirsting for the destruction of the world.

Disgusting.
 
Street Juice said:
So God was cool ...
Who goes after the innocent if not the genocidal Arab side? They also hide among civilians.
Disgusting cowards.
 
Who goes after the innocent if not the genocidal Arab side? They also hide among civilians.
Disgusting cowards.
Ever heard of the Massacre of Dar Yasein?

 
Street Juice said:
Ever heard of the Massacre of Dar Yasein?

/

What was the point about Holocaust denier UNZ what's the connection to the subject?

Deir Yassin was in 1948.


Propaganda Exposed.
Review of 'The Massacre That Never Was' by Eliezer Tauber.
by Seth Mandel. Mar 2022.


The Massacre that Never was: The Myth of Deir Yassin and the Creation of the Palestinian Refugee Problem.

Eliezer Tauber.
Toby Press, 2021 - History - 336 pages

What really happened at Deir Yassin? In The Massacre That Never Was, a work of engrossing narrative and exhaustive research, Professor Eliezer Tauber proves that no massacre of Palestinians took place in the village of Deir Yassin in 1948, exploding a myth that has been the cornerstone of the Palestinian narrative for seven decades. Reconstructing a fierce ten-hour battle through a meticulous analysis of Arab and Jewish testimony and documents from 1948 that are still closed to the public, Professor Tauber persuasively demonstrates that the massacre narrative was a myth intentionally invented by the Arab leadership of 1948 Jerusalem. Furthermore, the subsequent false rumors surrounding the event exacerbated the mass exodus of Arabs from Palestine, thus creating the refugee crisis and fueling propaganda against Israel, which has shaped the world's understanding of the affair to this day. A timely work of historical reappraisal, The Massacre That Never Was will have a major impact on how we understand Israeli and Palestinian history. Book jacket.
 
Last edited:
Ugh -- that translation is middling. The Hebrew phrase is lo techaye kol neshama (that breatheth? lol)
here are some important notes about the phrase:
"The validity of this commandment is limited to the generation Moses is addressing, i.e. the period during which the Israelites will be engaged in fighting the Canaanites in order to settle in the land promised by G-d to their patriarchs, Avraham, Yitzchok, and Yaakov. If members of these tribes had emigrated voluntarily, and at some future date return individually, and even wish to convert to Judaism this is acceptable." (Chizkuni)

[I'll skip what the Nachal Kedumim says about magic and witchcraft]

The Rashbam explains the phrase to mean "However, if they make the first move in approaching you, and express their willingness to become your slaves before the battle is joined you are allowed to let them live."

sorry you don't know how to read large chunks of text but if you started beforehand you would see that this specific verse is speaking only about specific tribes at a specific time and in specific circumstances. Now if you are against the laws of warfare in history then great. But to extrapolate from that and impute actions, motives and understandings to a group (which you know very little about in terms of actual beliefs and behaviors) then you look stupid. Like you do right now.
It seems "Street Juice" has mistranslation, directly from neo nazi sources.
 
This was written on March 11, 1948. Months before re established Israel.



View attachment 1096252

⁨⁨The Sentinel⁩, 11 March 1948⁩ — ⁨Page 26⁩

'Genocide' is Now Practiced by Arabs
In their Campaign Against Jews


FRESH FROM THE WIRES.

By HIRSCH WOLFSON.

Paris, France, (WNS)—Some 800,000 to a million Jews living in the Arab lands of Africa and the Middle-East are today in mortal danger of annihilation.
They are being subjected to a wave of persecution of Hitler prototype and are being held as hostages no less, in the calculated scheme of reactionary Arab leaders to prevent the fulfillment of the UN decision to establish independent Jewish and Arab states in Palestine.

Much of the news about what is happening to the Jews in these countries today—from Libya and Tripoli in Africa to the new Dominion of Pakistan on the subcontinent of India— is prevented from reaching the outside world. But enough information is available to paint a very grave picture of the conditions of the Jews in this part of the world.

Significantly enough , the worst anti-Jewish outbreaks reported to date, have occurred in in the British protectorates of Aden and Bahrien. A pogrom occurred in Aden (on the Red Sea) on December 2 , 1947 in which 76 Jews are known to have been killed and at least 64 wounded. Of all the Jewish
homes in Aden, one-third were destroyed,
the majoritv of all Jewish stores were robbed or put to the torch, and four synagogues have been burned and the only two Jewish schools were also set afire. In the Bahrien Islands on the Persian Gulf 41 Jewish casualties have been reported, and homes and synagogues have been burned.

Other serious outbreaks have occurred in Aleppo, Syria, where ten synagogues, five Jewish schools, 50 shops and other Jewish property were destroyed; and in Peshewar, Pakistan, where many Jewish people were killed, their homes sacked , and the entire Jewish population had to be evacuated.

This anti-Semitic activity is by no means something foreign , or new to the political climate of these Arab countries.
In a number of these countries, anti-Jewish restrictions have prevailed for many years and anti-Semitic outbreaks have occurred frequently.

In Algeria, Tunisia and French Morocco, the Vichyite regime during the war introduced anti-Jewiah laws by which Jewish businesses were Aryan-ized and anti-Semitism encouraged among the local population. The Jewish population of 375,000 in these countries thus endured great suffering, which has hardly been alleviated since the end of the war.

In Libya , occupied by the Germans during the war, the Jewish community of 25,000 was subjected to a sadistic pogromist campaign in the usual manner of the Nazis. Liberation and occupation by Britain brought no relief here either.

In 1945 a new series of pogroms occurred in Tripoli , in which about 80 Jews were killed and more than 250 wounded.

Everywhere the Arab league, now leading the fight against the UN Palestine descision, has for many years dome its vest to stir up the native population against the Jews. And governments in Arab league countries such as in Egypt, Iraq , Syria and Lebanon have not hesitated to introduce restrictions working great hardships on the Jews.

The latest outbreaks herald a turn to a much worse situation, according to information obtained by the World Jewish Congress. It is reported that the Arab league has now submitted to its member states a series of proposed anti-Jewish laws modelled after Hitler's infamous Nuremburg decrees against the Jews. By these laws, declares A. L. Easterman, political secretary of the World Jewish Congress, the Jews in the Arab countries would be deprived of their political and civic rights, reduced to the status of "foreigners" and have their means of livelihood severely limited and possibly eliminated altogether.

This action against the Jews of those lands is part of the general conspiriicy of the Arab league to prevent the ful-fillment of the UN decision on Palestine. It is inspired by the ex-Mufti, Haj Amin el Husseini, who aided Hitler in exterminating the Jews of Europe and now wants to ape Hitler in the Arab lands as part of a campaign to increase his own power in the Arab world.

World Jewish Congress leaders have rightfully termed the pogroms against the Jews in Arab lands, together with the contemplated anti-Jewish laws, as Genocide, which has been declared a crime under international law by the General Assembly of the United Nations.

The Arab states emulating Hitler's anti-Jewish policies are members of the United Nations and bound by the UN Charter and the decision of the UN Assembly taken in November, 1946, calling on governments "to take the most prompt and energetic steps. . . . to put an immediate end to religious and so-called racial persecution and discrimination. . . ."

With full justification, World Jewish Congress has called for investigation and action by the UN in regard to the deteriorating circumstances of the Jews in Arab Lands. The need for effective measures to protect the Jews these countries is part of the need for forthright UN action to implement its own decision on Palestine. The attitude of the Arab league in defying the UN decision and in conspiring to commit the UN designated crime of genocide is the most serious challenge yet to the authority of the United Nations Organization.

Not only to relieve a persecuted people, but in the name of all humanity and to protect world peace and se-curity, the most forthright UN action is needed to cope with the serious situation that has developed as a result of the Palestine decision.
They famously communicated with the nazis, though there were some well respected Islamic leaders who were against the genocide.

Unfortunately there was also those who agreed firmly with the nazis and there have even been suggestions that they first suggested the Final Solution though this is debatable.
 
They famously communicated with the nazis, though there were some well respected Islamic leaders who were against the genocide.

Unfortunately there was also those who agreed firmly with the nazis and there have even been suggestions that they first suggested the Final Solution though this is debatable.
When it came to Arab-Palestine area, it was overwhelmingly nazi-fied. As Shukeiri testified in his book, as poll showed in Feb-1941 and as CIA reported in 1942.
 
When it came to Arab-Palestine area, it was overwhelmingly nazi-fied. As Shukeiri testified in his book, as poll showed in Feb-1941 and as CIA reported in 1942.
It the reason why propagandist fake historian Racist Arab Gilbert Achcar try to blend Arab Palestinians with Arab Egyptians . To make it sem "complex".
No wonder, the Arab lobby on Wikipedia promoted him
 
When it came to Arab-Palestine area, it was overwhelmingly nazi-fied. As Shukeiri testified in his book, as poll showed in Feb-1941 and as CIA reported in 1942.
The question is, were they the impetus of discouraging the nazis from forcing Jews to leave Germany as they didn't want them to emigrate to the Middle East and instead supported/recommended Hitlers efforts to commit genocide instead?

Obviously even forcing people to abandon their homes is horrible. Some fortunate citizens in Europe did just that leaving everything behind but they were correct in their assessment, not an assessment everyone shared at the time; and it saved their lives. This is true for not just Germany but other European nations as Germanies war machine rolled on and some became better informed and of course, resistance groups developed in places like France.

One has to understand that they didn't have internet back then, the main source of news was via the paper or radio. So many didn't realize just how much danger they were really in. The Arab influence has evidence confirming both arguments though it seems fairly clear that they certainly weren't an ally of what was good and honourable at that time.

Our species is flawed. Events today don't lend one to be optimistic about our species survival for even 100 years let alone 100,000.
 
Back
Top Bottom