Is Hillary Clinton a Cheater?

[Clementine]

I know the left will say this is old news. Actually, since it has yet to be corrected, that makes it current. Since they are aware that votes were thrown out due to a malfunction, that means Hillary was not the winner in a few states. It means Bernie should have taken those states where votes for him were mysteriously erased. Cheating? And can we expect these same malfunctions in the November election? So damn convenient when the "mistakes" favor Hillary. When officials are aware that 4,000 people were disenfranchised by supposed malfunctioning card readers, how can they allow that to stand? When the failure resulted in one candidate winning when otherwise they wouldn't have, it should be corrected if our system is to remain fair.



"In Pike County Kentucky, card readers reportedly malfunctioned and votes were fully erased.


The Pike County Clerk’s office told local Kentucky station WKYT there were issues with one of their card readers which caused a delay in the numbers and as a result, the AP then erased Sanders’ votes, pushing Hillary to the lead by over 4,000 votes.

According to Real Clear Politics Clinton eventually received 212,550 votes in Kentucky to Bernie Sanders’ 210,626 votes for a difference of only 1,924 votes. The 4,000 vote discrepancy gave Clinton the Primary.

There were more than 76 reports of election fraud in 31 different counties called into Kentucky’s Attorney General hotline during the closely contested Democrat primary, according to Attorney General Andy Beshear. The Sanders campaign was expectedly outraged by the reports which were similar to what has occurred in other states – and many are pointing the finger at the Clinton campaign."

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/05/hillary-clinton-campaign-accused-cheating-kentucky-primary-4000-votes-discounted-give-hillary-win/

 

[Fueri]

Does a bear shit in the woods?

 

[g5000]

Yes, Hillary has an army of people around the country rigging voting machines, and they have invisibility cloaks which prevent a single one of them from getting caught.

As we all know, computer software never fails. It can only fail if a sooper sekrit conspirator makes it fail on purpose. There has never been a computer in America which has failed due to operator error or a malfunction. Hundreds of millions of computers operate without a single glitch anywhere every day. This is common knowledge. I don't even know why we have IT departments, frankly.

Therefore, we can only arrive at one conclusion upon hearing of voting machine malfunctions: Hillary cheated.

 

[Hossfly]

I see that Chads are making a comeback. Hanging chads, double chads and every kind of chad there is. Poor Bernie!

 

[irosie91]

Yes, Hillary has an army of people around the country rigging voting machines, and they have invisibility cloaks which prevent a single one of them from getting caught.

As we all know, computer software never fails. It can only fail if a sooper sekrit conspirator makes it fail on purpose. There has never been a computer in America which has failed due to operator error or a malfunction. Hundreds of millions of computers operate without a single glitch anywhere every day. This is common knowledge. I don't even know why we have IT departments, frankly.

Therefore, we can only arrive at one conclusion upon hearing of voting machine malfunctions: Hillary cheated.

would someone tell my computer that computers never fail-----
that old one that I junked could use a good TALKING TO---as well

 

[Clementine]

Point is that they know the exact number of Bernie votes that were erased. If they know that, why are they just letting them go? Once they are aware that there is a problem and it's as widespread as this issue was, why wouldn't they stop the election, fix the problem and then do it over?

There were machines all over the state doing the same thing, which was failing to register votes for Bernie. While computers can fail, it's funny that they were so one-sided in their failures, as if they were programmed. It was similar to the voting in the last presidential election where people's vote were automatically being switched to Obama as they went to enter them.

Sorry, but this seems more orchestrated rather than a random glitch.

 

[Freewill]

I know the left will say this is old news. Actually, since it has yet to be corrected, that makes it current. Since they are aware that votes were thrown out due to a malfunction, that means Hillary was not the winner in a few states. It means Bernie should have taken those states where votes for him were mysteriously erased. Cheating? And can we expect these same malfunctions in the November election? So damn convenient when the "mistakes" favor Hillary. When officials are aware that 4,000 people were disenfranchised by supposed malfunctioning card readers, how can they allow that to stand? When the failure resulted in one candidate winning when otherwise they wouldn't have, it should be corrected if our system is to remain fair.



"In Pike County Kentucky, card readers reportedly malfunctioned and votes were fully erased.


The Pike County Clerk’s office told local Kentucky station WKYT there were issues with one of their card readers which caused a delay in the numbers and as a result, the AP then erased Sanders’ votes, pushing Hillary to the lead by over 4,000 votes.

According to Real Clear Politics Clinton eventually received 212,550 votes in Kentucky to Bernie Sanders’ 210,626 votes for a difference of only 1,924 votes. The 4,000 vote discrepancy gave Clinton the Primary.

There were more than 76 reports of election fraud in 31 different counties called into Kentucky’s Attorney General hotline during the closely contested Democrat primary, according to Attorney General Andy Beshear. The Sanders campaign was expectedly outraged by the reports which were similar to what has occurred in other states – and many are pointing the finger at the Clinton campaign."

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/05/hillary-clinton-campaign-accused-cheating-kentucky-primary-4000-votes-discounted-give-hillary-win/

Mrs. Tuzla clinton supporters will just chalk it up to how to run a campaign, democrat establishment style.

 

[g5000]

There have been voting machine problems all around the country since they first began using them. And the errors are non-partisan. You are only being told about the ones which fit your bias by your propaganda outlets.

There are also a lot of operator errors. Poll workers are receiving shitty training, and quite a few poll workers are septuagenarians who don't even know how to use their answering machine at home, much less a computerized voting machine. Even a paper ballot system can be beyond their abilities.

I remember one polling station where the voters were telling the poll workers that the pens they had been given to mark their paper ballots weren't making a mark on the paper. The poll workers told them the pens used invisible ink! In fact, the pens they had given to the voters to use were styluses meant for computer touch screens.

That's some seriously bad training.

I once listed links from all around the country like that one. There were computer failures and poll worker errors in both Republican and Democratic majority precincts.

"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by carelessness".

But partisan hacks will always assume a conspiracy. It fits the narrative they have been trained to believe.

 

[g5000]

Remember that story about there being more ballots cast than there were voters someplace in Florida? I still hear that one come up once in a while.

The fact is that the ballot was two pages, and the computer voting machine had been programmed that a ballot was one page. So a two page ballot ended up counting as two people voting. And that is how you got a story that more votes were cast than there were voters in that precinct.

GIGO.

 

[g5000]

Stealing an election is way harder than you think it is. Especially a national one. It would require an army of people all over the country to pull off, without a single one ever getting caught or talking.

Figure the odds.

 

[Clementine]

I know the left will say this is old news. Actually, since it has yet to be corrected, that makes it current. Since they are aware that votes were thrown out due to a malfunction, that means Hillary was not the winner in a few states. It means Bernie should have taken those states where votes for him were mysteriously erased. Cheating? And can we expect these same malfunctions in the November election? So damn convenient when the "mistakes" favor Hillary. When officials are aware that 4,000 people were disenfranchised by supposed malfunctioning card readers, how can they allow that to stand? When the failure resulted in one candidate winning when otherwise they wouldn't have, it should be corrected if our system is to remain fair.



"In Pike County Kentucky, card readers reportedly malfunctioned and votes were fully erased.


The Pike County Clerk’s office told local Kentucky station WKYT there were issues with one of their card readers which caused a delay in the numbers and as a result, the AP then erased Sanders’ votes, pushing Hillary to the lead by over 4,000 votes.

According to Real Clear Politics Clinton eventually received 212,550 votes in Kentucky to Bernie Sanders’ 210,626 votes for a difference of only 1,924 votes. The 4,000 vote discrepancy gave Clinton the Primary.

There were more than 76 reports of election fraud in 31 different counties called into Kentucky’s Attorney General hotline during the closely contested Democrat primary, according to Attorney General Andy Beshear. The Sanders campaign was expectedly outraged by the reports which were similar to what has occurred in other states – and many are pointing the finger at the Clinton campaign."

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/05/hillary-clinton-campaign-accused-cheating-kentucky-primary-4000-votes-discounted-give-hillary-win/

Mrs. Tuzla clinton supporters will just chalk it up to how to run a campaign, democrat establishment style.

When there was a "hanging chad" problem, no one would let it rest until they did everything possible to determine how people voted. It wasn't acceptable for anyone to be disenfranchised.

Now, they knew this problem was occurring during voting and complaints rolled in from around the state. At what point should they have halted things and delayed the election until people would have their votes count? It was just a primary and delaying it would not have been a huge deal. Thousands of people were disenfranchised, but since Hillary was the victor, the left says it's all cool. Do you think Bernie has a right to be angry since he may have been the winner?

If there are really this many problems, we cannot trust any results. Not like these voting computers are used year round. There is ample time to test them and work out any bugs. Sadly, there is also time for hackers to make sure certain votes are lost.

 

[SmokeALib]

I can't tell you if Hillary is a cheater or not. But I can tell you she's a bus stop rat bag old hag power-hungry incompetent lying piece of shit.

 

[Freewill]

I can't tell you if Hillary is a cheater or not. But I can tell you she's a bus stop rat bag old hag power-hungry incompetent lying piece of shit.

Please get to the point.