Is free speech under attack?

[struth]

Nothing about price fixing which means I’m right. You’re wrong.

hahah illegal boycotts aren't just illegal if they do price fixing....geez man, again, you show your ignorance and didn't read the link i provided you.

 

[Marener]

hahah illegal boycotts aren't just illegal if they do price fixing....geez man, again, you show your ignorance and didn't read the link i provided you.

It’s the vast majority of what constitutes illegal boycotts.

What else makes the boycott illegal?

 

[struth]

It’s the vast majority of what constitutes illegal boycotts.

What else makes the boycott illegal?

hahah now you are just making things up.....you are truly weird and pathetic.

Read the link I provided.

 

[Marener]

hahah now you are just making things up.....you are truly weird and pathetic.

Read the link I provided.

The article proves I’m right.

It even shows how Musk has a history of attacking free speech:
It’s not the first time X has filed a lawsuit related to its declining ad business. Last year, it sued the Center for Countering Digital Hate, alleging the nonprofit group violated its terms of service when it studied, and then wrote about, hate speech on the platform and blamed it for driving away advertisers. A federal judge tossed the suit in March, blasting it as an attempt to punish CCDH for protected speech.

 

[Slade3200]

Why waste my time?

Now you think backing up your statements a waste of time?! Right after accusing me of not backing up my statements?! Wow. You’re a real piece of work

 

[martybegan]

Now you think backing up your statements a waste of time?! Right after accusing me of not backing up my statements?! Wow. You’re a real piece of work

All you are worthy of. Provide actual content instead of just snark and worthless rebuttal next time.

 

[struth]

The article proves I’m right.

It even shows how Musk has a history of attacking free speech:
It’s not the first time X has filed a lawsuit related to its declining ad business. Last year, it sued the Center for Countering Digital Hate, alleging the nonprofit group violated its terms of service when it studied, and then wrote about, hate speech on the platform and blamed it for driving away advertisers. A federal judge tossed the suit in March, blasting it as an attempt to punish CCDH for protected speech.

What a weird statement.

Suing a group for an illegal boycott is not an attack on free speech

 

[Marener]

What a weird statement.

Suing a group for an illegal boycott is not an attack on free speech

Yes it is. Boycotts are a function of speech.

You have no explanation for what would make the boycott illegal. It certainly wasn’t about price fixing. What was it?

Also, thanks for the link that proves Musk attacks free speech with lawsuits.

 

[struth]

Yes it is. Boycotts are a function of speech.

You have no explanation for what would make the boycott illegal. It certainly wasn’t about price fixing. What was it?

Also, thanks for the link that proves Musk attacks free speech with lawsuits.

Illegal boycotts aren’t protected speech

They are illegal

I provided a link highlighting the ways boycotts be illegal and what the lawsuit is claiming.

You can’t seem to accept reality m, which is weird

 

[Marener]

Illegal boycotts aren’t protected speech

They are illegal

I provided a link highlighting the ways boycotts be illegal and what the lawsuit is claiming.

You can’t seem to accept reality m, which is weird

The lawsuit makes no allegations that the link says would constitute an illegal boycott.

You can’t even describe why the boycott would be illegal because you don’t have any idea!

 

[struth]

The lawsuit makes no allegations that the link says would constitute an illegal boycott.

You can’t even describe why the boycott would be illegal because you don’t have any idea!

Yes it does. Geez man, clearly you didn’t read the links I’ve provided and described…you ignore them

And have this weird idea that lawsuits are an attack on free speech

 

[Marener]

Yes it does. Geez man, clearly you didn’t read the links I’ve provided and described…you ignore them

And have this weird idea that lawsuits are an attack on free speech

Lawsuits sometimes are attacks on free speech. Musk has done this in the past. Your own link proved it.

Clearly you didn’t read the links because you can’t talk about what is in them AND they also proved my point for me.

There was nothing illegal about the boycott. This lawsuit is just an attack on free speech.

 

[struth]

Lawsuits sometimes are attacks on free speech. Musk has done this in the past. Your own link proved it.

Clearly you didn’t read the links because you can’t talk about what is in them AND they also proved my point for me.

There was nothing illegal about the boycott. This lawsuit is just an attack on free speech.

No they aren’t. Ever. They literally are free speech, they are a tool for people to openly speak and settle their differences in a legal civil matter.

That’s why the left hates lawsuits, they want to be able to continue their illegal boycotts, riots, doxing, cancel culture brownshirt behavior

While also turning a blind eye to actual censorship by demafasict leadership, jailing polltical rivals, spying on press they don’t like, threatening reporters if they report negatively on them

 

[hadit]

They can only make requests. And the government has every right to do so.

But even beyond that, the government does have a right to intervene in what is broadcast. The government can regulate porn on social media, for example.

I'll agree to the government regulating political speech as long as I, and only I, define what is acceptable and what is not.

 

[Marener]

No they aren’t. Ever. They literally are free speech, they are a tool for people to openly speak and settle their differences in a legal civil matter.

That’s why the left hates lawsuits, they want to be able to continue their illegal boycotts, riots, doxing, cancel culture brownshirt behavior

While also turning a blind eye to actual censorship by demafasict leadership, jailing polltical rivals, spying on press they don’t like, threatening reporters if they report negatively on them

The court says you are wrong.

 

[struth]

The court says you are wrong.

What court??? The lawsuit is still going…illegal boycotts are in fact illegal

 

[Marener]

What court??? The lawsuit is still going…illegal boycotts are in fact illegal

The court already ruled that one of Musk’s lawsuits was an attack on free speech.

Obviously you didn’t even read your own link.

 

[struth]

The court already ruled that one of Musk’s lawsuits was an attack on free speech.

Obviously you didn’t even read your own link.

Did the court rule that way for this lawsuit?

And no my link didn’t say that

 

[Marener]

Did the court rule that way for this lawsuit?

And no my link didn’t say that

Yes, your link said that. You didn’t even read it. Not surprised.

Musk is now filing these lawsuits in North Texas despite the fact that none of them are in North Texas and he’s got corrupt judges which are allowing his frivolous lawsuits.

 

[struth]

Yes, your link said that. You didn’t even read it. Not surprised.

Musk is now filing these lawsuits in North Texas despite the fact that none of them are in North Texas and he’s got corrupt judges which are allowing his frivolous lawsuits.

No no it didn’t.

Illegal boycotts are illegal

musk is moving X and SpaceX to Austin. It’s where the companies are headquartered

The original judge actually recused himself. What’s corrupt about that?

Is this like your lawsuits are an attack on free speech line?? Do you want to go down that rabbit hole if embarrassment again?