Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 45,883
- 19,986
- 2,173
How does it violate it? You donât wonât say because you donât know!I literally just said, it violated the Sherman anti-trust act
What part of that donât you get?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How does it violate it? You donât wonât say because you donât know!I literally just said, it violated the Sherman anti-trust act
What part of that donât you get?
Isnât that exactly what youâre doing?All you are worthy of. Provide actual content instead of just snark and worthless rebuttal next time.
Yes he could. Anywhere he did or does businessBy your logic he could have filed the case anywhere in the entire country. He chose North Texas because he knows the judges there are okay with rich guys using lawsuits to suppress free speech.
Judges in the rest of the country donât really put up with that and havenât, as your link proved when the judge in California ruled Musk was attacking free speech.
Nah. Most judges wouldnât allow that. The rabidly conservative judges in north Texas will because they are okay with attacks on free speech by rich conservative jerks.Yes he could. Anywhere he did or does business
Iâve repeated answered your question on what they are alleging.How does it violate it? You donât wonât say because you donât know!
What the F are you talking about? A plaintiff can file a lawsuit wherever they were damagedNah. Most judges wouldnât allow that. The rabidly conservative judges in north Texas will because they are okay with attacks on free speech by rich conservative jerks.
He is venue shopping proving itâs all about attacking free speech.
But you wonât say what theyâre alleging because you donât know! You never read the lawsuit!But what they alleged is that they violated for the reasons outlined in the law suit
No reason to file the lawsuit in North Texas other than shopping for conservative hack judges who will let him attack free speech.What the F are you talking about? A plaintiff can file a lawsuit wherever they were damaged
I did! Haha wow, either yoj canât read or canât comprehendâŚor are just a liarBut you wonât say what theyâre alleging because you donât know! You never read the lawsuit!
Why not? He does business there. Dallas is a big city.No reason to file the lawsuit in North Texas other than shopping for conservative hack judges who will let him attack free speech.
None of the people in the lawsuit are centered in North Texas. The friendly judges are.
I keep asking and you cant answer because you donât know!I did! Haha wow, either yoj canât read or canât comprehendâŚor are just a liar
Because no one in the lawsuit is in Dallas.Why not? He does business there. Dallas is a big city.
What the f? They all do business in Texas!Because no one in the lawsuit is in Dallas.
Thereâs only one reason to file the lawsuit there.
Illegal boycotts violate the actI keep asking and you cant answer because you donât know!
How does it violate the Sherman Antitrust act? You canât say!
None of them are in North Texas.What the f? They all do business in Texas!
The plantiff is moving his multi billion dollar companies there. He can file it there
What's illegal about the boycott? You won't say because you don't know!Illegal boycotts violate the act
You are dumb keep deflectingWhat's illegal about the boycott? You won't say because you don't know!
Itâs not deflected to ask what was illegal about the boycott. You keep avoiding the question because you donât know!You are dumb keep deflecting
Prove none of them do business in DallasâŚNone of them are in North Texas.
There's only one reason to file it there. Lawfare!
I am not the juryâŚpart of that donât you get?Itâs not deflected to ask what was illegal about the boycott. You keep avoiding the question because you donât know!