Is free speech under attack?

I literally just said, it violated the Sherman anti-trust act

What part of that don’t you get?
How does it violate it? You don’t won’t say because you don’t know!
 
By your logic he could have filed the case anywhere in the entire country. He chose North Texas because he knows the judges there are okay with rich guys using lawsuits to suppress free speech.

Judges in the rest of the country don’t really put up with that and haven’t, as your link proved when the judge in California ruled Musk was attacking free speech.
Yes he could. Anywhere he did or does business
 
Yes he could. Anywhere he did or does business
Nah. Most judges wouldn’t allow that. The rabidly conservative judges in north Texas will because they are okay with attacks on free speech by rich conservative jerks.

He is venue shopping proving it’s all about attacking free speech.
 
How does it violate it? You don’t won’t say because you don’t know!
I’ve repeated answered your question on what they are alleging.

I am not musk lawyers, nobody has had trial yet to present the evidence. But what they alleged is that they violated for the reasons outlined in the law suit


Clearly you have no idea how the legal system works
 
Nah. Most judges wouldn’t allow that. The rabidly conservative judges in north Texas will because they are okay with attacks on free speech by rich conservative jerks.

He is venue shopping proving it’s all about attacking free speech.
What the F are you talking about? A plaintiff can file a lawsuit wherever they were damaged

Violating the anti trust act isn’t free speech! Hahav I get you demafacist want monopolies but they aren’t legal or just
 
But what they alleged is that they violated for the reasons outlined in the law suit
But you won’t say what they’re alleging because you don’t know! You never read the lawsuit!
 
What the F are you talking about? A plaintiff can file a lawsuit wherever they were damaged
No reason to file the lawsuit in North Texas other than shopping for conservative hack judges who will let him attack free speech.

None of the people in the lawsuit are centered in North Texas. The friendly judges are.
 
But you won’t say what they’re alleging because you don’t know! You never read the lawsuit!
I did! Haha wow, either yoj can’t read or can’t comprehend…or are just a liar
 
No reason to file the lawsuit in North Texas other than shopping for conservative hack judges who will let him attack free speech.

None of the people in the lawsuit are centered in North Texas. The friendly judges are.
Why not? He does business there. Dallas is a big city.
 
I did! Haha wow, either yoj can’t read or can’t comprehend…or are just a liar
I keep asking and you cant answer because you don’t know!

How does it violate the Sherman Antitrust act? You can’t say!
 
Why not? He does business there. Dallas is a big city.
Because no one in the lawsuit is in Dallas.

There’s only one reason to file the lawsuit there.
 
Because no one in the lawsuit is in Dallas.

There’s only one reason to file the lawsuit there.
What the f? They all do business in Texas!

The plantiff is moving his multi billion dollar companies there. He can file it there
 
I keep asking and you cant answer because you don’t know!

How does it violate the Sherman Antitrust act? You can’t say!
Illegal boycotts violate the act
 
What the f? They all do business in Texas!

The plantiff is moving his multi billion dollar companies there. He can file it there
None of them are in North Texas.

There's only one reason to file it there. Lawfare!
 
You are dumb keep deflecting
It’s not deflected to ask what was illegal about the boycott. You keep avoiding the question because you don’t know!
 
It’s not deflected to ask what was illegal about the boycott. You keep avoiding the question because you don’t know!
I am not the jury…part of that don’t you get?
 
Back
Top Bottom