Is free speech under attack?

[Marener]

Prove none of them do business in Dallas…

I don't have to. There's only one reason to pick North Texas.

 

[Marener]

I am not the jury…part of that don’t you get?

Like I said. You don't know!

 

[sparky]

One would have to be living under a rock not to know what's going down here

~S~

 

[Thunderbird]

We all saw what happened in the UK. Is this coming here? Violence isn’t protected and now many on the left want to make “misinformation” illegal. But misinformation is subjective and subject to interpretation.
Good article attached from thehill.com along with some other pertinent data.

Are you for or against free speech if that speech includes what you perceive as misinformation but not violence?

Democrats cry foul as anti-free speech allies turn against them

“Like Saturn, the Revolution devours its children.”

thehill.com

Adam Schiff renews the Democratic war against the First Amendment - Washington Examiner

In September 2014, 54 Democratic senators voted to repeal the First Amendment of the Constitution.They were supporting a proposed constitutional amendment by Sen. Tom Udall, D-N.M., whose stated goal was to overturn the Supreme Court’s landmark Citizens United decision, which struck down a host...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Coming soon to the U.S.

 

[struth]

Like I said. You don't know!

Hahaha you are pathetic

 

[struth]

I don't have to. There's only one reason to pick North Texas.

Correct because the plaintiff does business there

 

[SeaMajor7]

Marener is this forum's Ms. Contrary-pants II next to pknob.

 

[struth]

Marener is this forum's Ms. Contrary-pants II next to pknob.

He is very weird

 

[Marener]

Correct because the plaintiff does business there

Nope. Because the judges there allow rich people to use lawfare to attack free speech.

 

[Marener]

Hahaha you are pathetic

It’s pathetic you keep pretending to understand any of this. What was illegal about the boycott?

 

[struth]

Nope. Because the judges there allow rich people to use lawfare to attack free speech.

Hahahabab

So weird

 

[struth]

It’s pathetic you keep pretending to understand any of this. What was illegal about the boycott?

Wow you are weird

You have had your ass handed to you on this thread and continue to be so weird

 

[Marener]

Wow you are weird

You have had your ass handed to you on this thread and continue to be so weird

Who did that? Surely not you who doesn’t even know what we are talking about.

You handed your own ass to yourself when you posted a link where a judge ruled Musk used lawsuits to attack free speech.

 

[struth]

Who did that? Surely not you who doesn’t even know what we are talking about.

You handed your own ass to yourself when you posted a link where a judge ruled Musk used lawsuits to attack free speech.

you are here claiming Musk lawsuit is an attack on free speech, and that venue was not proper...ahahahhah and you claim I dn't know what I am talking about??? hahahahahhah

you didn't even know a boycott could be illegal until yesteday.

 

[Marener]

you are here claiming Musk lawsuit is an attack on free speech, and that venue was not proper...ahahahhah and you claim I dn't know what I am talking about??? hahahahahhah

you didn't even know a boycott could be illegal until yesteday.

It’s not an illegal boycott. Anyone with half a brain can see that.

It’s an assault on free speech just like Musk’s previous lawsuits.

 

[Stann]

We all saw what happened in the UK. Is this coming here? Violence isn’t protected and now many on the left want to make “misinformation” illegal. But misinformation is subjective and subject to interpretation.
Good article attached from thehill.com along with some other pertinent data.

Are you for or against free speech if that speech includes what you perceive as misinformation but not violence?

Democrats cry foul as anti-free speech allies turn against them

“Like Saturn, the Revolution devours its children.”

thehill.com

Adam Schiff renews the Democratic war against the First Amendment - Washington Examiner

In September 2014, 54 Democratic senators voted to repeal the First Amendment of the Constitution.They were supporting a proposed constitutional amendment by Sen. Tom Udall, D-N.M., whose stated goal was to overturn the Supreme Court’s landmark Citizens United decision, which struck down a host...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Obviously another anti-left post. Not worth my time other than a single comment . So who's banning all the books in our schools , what better way to attack free speech than to stifle it in youth and get them used to only thinking the preferred way. That's perfect for fascist far-right agendas.

 

[martybegan]

Isn’t that exactly what you’re doing?

Nope. I provide my position repeatedly.

 

[Slade3200]

Nope. I provide my position repeatedly.

I do the same when asked

 

[martybegan]

I do the same when asked

"when asked"

And I doubt that.

 

[Slade3200]

"when asked"

And I doubt that.

Easy way to find out