yidnar
Diamond Member
lol !You can believe what you want.It's simply a study on perception of stronger men, not a fact. It also says 3/4 of the women polled in the study reject magaturd men.
Stellar work, faggot.![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
lol !You can believe what you want.It's simply a study on perception of stronger men, not a fact. It also says 3/4 of the women polled in the study reject magaturd men.
Stellar work, faggot.![]()
YesIs this coming here?
DeSantis is all in on this kind of shit.
No weasel just straight forward definitions. If you have a different definition of misinformation than what I’ve said please provide it.
You have every opportunity to make a counterpoint or reenforce your arguments. I find many on here divert rather than dig in though
How is two private entities engaging in a lawsuit an attack on free speech??It’s under assault by rich and insecure thugs with the assistance of corrupt right wing judges.
![]()
Elon Musk’s X sued a nonprofit advertising group out of existence
A major ad industry group is shutting down, days after Elon Musk-owned X filed a lawsuit that claimed the group illegally conspired to boycott advertising ...www.toledoblade.com
why was this 'private entity' such a concern to Congress??How is two private entities engaging in a lawsuit an attack on free speech??
Weird post, not sure what the picture is
When conservatives want to believe something despite all evidence to the contrary, they call it an opinion and pretend it doesn’t need to have any substantiation.I've provided it. Misinformation is simply opinions one side doesn't like.
It’s one private entity creating a lawsuit and one private entity required by by court to defend themselves.How is two private entities engaging in a lawsuit an attack on free speech??
What a weird post
And how the FUCK is it any way different from the demented LEFT?????When conservatives want to believe something despite all evidence to the contrary, they call it an opinion and pretend it doesn’t need to have any substantiation.
Yes it can be.It’s one private entity creating a lawsuit and one private entity required by by court to defend themselves.
Defending oneself from a lawsuit is expensive.
The courts should not be a tool by which rich people punish speech they don’t like by imposing a cost with a frivolous lawsuit that has no chance of succeeding.Yes it can be.
Why do you think people shouldn’t be able to go to court to settle their disputes? How is that an assault on fre speech?
How was it a frivolous lawsuit?The courts should not be a tool by which rich people punish speech they don’t like by imposing a cost with a frivolous lawsuit that has no chance of succeeding.
Musk has high prices lawyers who can drag this process on for years.How was it a frivolous lawsuit?
If it were the other party can get sanctions, lawyers can be disbarred, they can also get attorney fees
For example stormy Daniels was ordered to pay trumps legal fees
So wealty people aren’t allowed to take conflicts to court?Musk has high prices lawyers who can drag this process on for years.
At the very end, they should get fees paid, but Musk’s high priced lawyers can drag that process and payment out for years too.
In the meantime, your time and money is consumed by Musk who doesn’t have any repercussions.
So by abusing the courts, rich people can make your free speech extremely costly.
Sure, they can take legitimate claims. These types of illegitimate claims should be thrown out immediately but Musk filed the case before judges that he knew wouldn’t do so. Conservative judges are permitting this attack on free speech.So wealty people aren’t allowed to take conflicts to court?
Haha why do you think they don’t have rights?
How is this illegitimate? I agree illegit claims should be tossed, like Daniels paying trumps legal fees or Jack smith cases being tossedSure, they can take legitimate claims. These types of illegitimate claims should be thrown out immediately but Musk filed the case before judges that he knew wouldn’t do so. Conservative judges are permitting this attack on free speech.
Boycotts are a perfectly legal form of speech. Musk is claiming they have no right to form a boycott.How is this illegitimate? I agree illegit claims should be tossed, like Daniels paying trumps legal fees or Jack smith cases being tossed
You’ve yet to show how this case is illegit
And you have yet to show us how lawsuits are an assault on free speech.
Maybe you should actually read the lawsuit before you keep going down this rabbit hole of stupidBoycotts are a perfectly legal form of speech. Musk is claiming they have no right to form a boycott.
I did. GARM organized a boycott of Twitter. Musk claims that was illegal.Maybe you should actually read the lawsuit before you keep going down this rabbit hole of stupid