Zone1 Is Feminism Destroying the West?

[initforme]

Having kids in wedlock at what rate? Are half of those marriages failing due to feminism and no fault divorce?
Just who is filing for all those divorces?

Who cares? Marriage itself is losing traction. Good or bad however one views it, the trend will continue. Its not a duty nor responsibility to live as those in society declare as long as one is within the laws.

 

[DonGlock26]

Who cares? Marriage itself is losing traction. Good or bad however one views it, the trend will continue. Its not a duty nor responsibility to live as those in society declare as long as one is within the laws.

You brought it up, so you do. Why is marriage losing traction?

 

[Hafar1014]

You brought it up, so you do. Why is marriage losing traction?

The welfare state destroyed the father inn the black family which is the leading cause of poverty and crime. Democrats advocate single mothers depending on the state not a man. Remember Hillary It takes village and her film Julia. Women marry the state and are easy to control
Feminism gave us fat blue haired women with anxiety and depression.

 

[DonGlock26]

The welfare state destroyed the father inn the black family which is the leading cause of poverty and crime. Democrats advocate single mothers depending on the state not a man. Remember Hillary It takes village and her film Julia. Women marry the state and are easy to control
Feminism gave us fat blue haired women with anxiety and depression.

Facts.

 

[midcan5]

LOL Women sure take a beating from the ignorant.

 

[sartre play]

There always have been old maids but that is not the norm nor should it be.

Our government has seen fit to support single women with children which exacerbates irresponsible sex. With all the contraceptives available today, one wonders why so many women get pregnant and then don't want the child. Aside from rape, which is a horrendous crime, it is the woman's choice not to use contraceptives and therefore should bear all the responsibility, IMO

If one doesn't want a relationship then they can just not have one. That ain't rocket science however, I think that there is something mentally wrong with those not recognizing that having relationships is part of a normal life.

We are below replacement numbers in our population right now. That's just fact whether or not you 'buy' it or not.

Maybe IF there had been support for contraception's Back then, & way more Husbands had been forced to help provide
after a divorce, We would not have needed so much welfare.

 

[DonGlock26]

after a divorce, We would not have needed so much welfare.

When?

 

[DonGlock26]

LOL Women sure take a beating from the ignorant.

True.

A South Carolina Democrat admitted to abusing his ex-wife. He still won his primary.
Despite heat from national Democrats, Archie Parnell has refused to drop out.

A South Carolina Democrat admitted to abusing his ex-wife. He still won his primary.

Despite heat from national Democrats, Archie Parnell has refused to drop out.

www.vox.com

 

[sartre play]

More like a self-inflicted beating.


When?

PRE 1970s

More like a self-inflicted beating.


When?

pre 1970

 

[DonGlock26]

PRE 1970s

pre 1970

How much divorce was there BEFORE no-fault divorce? No-fault divorce lead to the need for a welfare state.

 

[playtime]

of course not.

 

[Hafar1014]

Maybe IF there had been support for contraception's Back then, & way more Husbands had been forced to help provide
after a divorce, We would not have needed so much welfare.

The single mother problem started after welfare because of welfare. Before that the black family was intact.

 

[initforme]

You brought it up, so you do. Why is marriage losing traction?

I frankly have zero interest seeing it be a success. Its up to those crazy enough to tie the knot.

 

[Leo123]

Maybe IF there had been support for contraception's Back then, & way more Husbands had been forced to help provide
after a divorce, We would not have needed so much welfare.

'Back then' life was hard and both men and women had work their asses off just to put food on the table however, having children was not shunned at all. There was no such thing as contraception so, men, especially, did not have access to free sex. They had to pay for it at the local Brothel and food was really the first priority.

Luckily, for men, feminism came along which, in its effort to make women equal to men ushered in contraceptives. Now, a woman could have sex just like a man and walk away clean. Unfortunately, when a woman 'forgets' to take contraception or maybe does not want to tell the man to wear a condom, 'unwanted' children are born and women are saddled with raising them. Also, feminism has diluted marriage to mean any 2 people, not just men and women which it was designed for.

Bottom line, when sex came with the real possibility of impregnation, women were not so eager to have procreational sex. In fact, to ensure she was not left alone to raise a child, women and society embraced the institution of marriage

In order to get sex and have children, men had to prove they could provide and had to be of good character before a woman would consider him even a valid suitor for marriage.

It is really up to women to just say no and hold out for a good man, of which there are fewer and fewer.

 

[initforme]

'Back then' life was hard and both men and women had work their asses off just to put food on the table however, having children was not shunned at all. There was no such thing as contraception so, men, especially, did not have access to free sex. They had to pay for it at the local Brothel and food was really the first priority.

Luckily, for men, feminism came along which, in its effort to make women equal to men ushered in contraceptives. Now, a woman could have sex just like a man and walk away clean. Unfortunately, when a woman 'forgets' to take contraception or maybe does not want to tell the man to wear a condom, 'unwanted' children are born and women are saddled with raising them. Also, feminism has diluted marriage to mean any 2 people, not just men and women which it was designed for.

Bottom line, when sex came with the real possibility of impregnation, women were not so eager to have procreational sex. In fact, to ensure she was not left alone to raise a child, women and society embraced the institution of marriage

In order to get sex and have children, men had to prove they could provide and had to be of good character before a woman would consider him even a valid suitor for marriage.

It is really up to women to just say no and hold out for a good man, of which there are fewer and fewer.

Hilarious

 

[Leo123]

Hilarious

That is really all you have to say? Why? You have no retort and proven nothing about anything. I wonder why you even bother. Wait, do you actually think everyone agrees with you so you don't have explain anything? Why are you even here then?

 

[MizMolly]

Women should never have been granted the right to vote.

lol I’m waiting for your reasoning for this stupid post.

 

[Blaster]

lol I’m waiting for your reasoning for this stupid post.

What is so stupid about it?

 

[initforme]

That is really all you have to say? Why? You have no retort and proven nothing about anything. I wonder why you even bother. Wait, do you actually think everyone agrees with you so you don't have explain anything? Why are you even here then?

Of course not everybody agrees. Everyone buying into one idea would be a bad thing. The idea that a few women not getting married and having kids has absolutely zeto effect on anything. Who cares what they do and how they want to live. This being subservient to men is frankly comical.

 

[Leo123]

Of course not everybody agrees. Everyone buying into one idea would be a bad thing. The idea that a few women not getting married and having kids has absolutely zeto effect on anything. Who cares what they do and how they want to live. This being subservient to men is frankly comical.

One would think if one knows everyone does not agree on a particular situation, it would behoove one to elucidate as to why instead of giving a stupid one word retort.

More and more women are not getting married because feminism has caused them to have to work, thus many 'liberated' women who get married and have kids find themselves having to work and take care of their children so they forego marriage and a family for a career. The evidence shows it's better for children to have a stay at home mom during their formative years. Somehow this is seen as women being slaves to men.

I never mentioned that women should be subservient to men, I said men and women are different. Generally, women care more about people and relationships while men generally care more about things. Feminism has given men what they want (free sex) and has done nothing for women.

I do think that feminism has given family and marriage a bad rap. I wasn't men denigrating housewives it was a feminist oriented society that relegated home makers to nothing more than slaves. You believe propaganda.