Zone1 Is Feminism Destroying the West?

[Dogmaphobe]

How do you define feminism? If it is about treating women as individuals while affording them the same rights as men, I'm all for it. If you are talking fourth wave misandry, then it has simply become what it hates


The one thing that HAS happened, though, is that Western women are choosing to have fewer children than replacement level, which has resulted in the mass immigration of third worlders who are too often MUCH more primitive than we were in the 50s when it comes to women.

 

[otto105]

This is a very interesting and controversial video discussing the decline of the West because largely of the Left's feminism.
I tend to agree. Birth rates are falling. The institution of marriage has become toxic to men due to no fault divorce laws and
the courts almost always awarding custody, child support, and even alimony to the wife. Women, especially young women, usually vote for progressive candidates, This has been disastrous for the West because the Left has been flooding the West with third world migrants to prop up the welfare state and dilute the native Western vote. Will the West survive this mass influx of Muslim migrants? How will women be affected by Sharia Law?

Nope, but scared old white nen are.

 

[DonGlock26]

Most liberal men sit with their legs crossed just like a woman.

You can just leave the toilet seat down for them.

 

[DonGlock26]

Nope, but scared old white nen are.

From this:

To this:

 

[otto105]

From this:



View attachment 1191126



To this:

Yeah, white man scared of everything.

 

[sparky]

what's interesting is women's rights in the 60's evolved into not being able to identify one at all........~S~

 

[DonGlock26]

Yeah, white man scared of everything.

 

[DonGlock26]

what's interesting is women's rights in the 60's evolved into not being able to identify one at all........~S~

Ladies voted for men in the ladies' room, which is very queer indeed.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Ladies voted for men in the ladies' room, which is very queer indeed.

That's the catch 22 isn't it.

Women, especially white middle class ones, tend to vote for the emotional issues and gush with sympathy...

I heard someone who while wanting to stand up for women, also say that they could also stand by and let men invade women's spaces/sports etc... because overall women have caused it by their voting and social stances.

Once again, it seems that men are the ones who have to come in and protect women... just as we always have... even if it's from their emotional tugs.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

How do you define feminism? If it is about treating women as individuals while affording them the same rights as men, I'm all for it. If you are talking fourth wave misandry, then it has simply become what it hates


The one thing that HAS happened, though, is that Western women are choosing to have fewer children than replacement level, which has resulted in the mass immigration of third worlders who are too often MUCH more primitive than we were in the 50s when it comes to women.

Modern women often have shed the natural call to sacrifice for human society. We've developed a narrative that women need to seek happiness first, and if that means women who are in the fence about kids being pulled into party/feminist/sexual revolution zones or women splitting households because they aren't happy... it all F's up our society. Men generally feel a call to protect the nation or people... they run to the front lines, it's how they are programmed. Women are supposed to be the glue of the family, and feminism is encouraging them to bail.

 

[Leo123]

How do you define feminism? If it is about treating women as individuals while affording them the same rights as men, I'm all for it. If you are talking fourth wave misandry, then it has simply become what it hates


The one thing that HAS happened, though, is that Western women are choosing to have fewer children than replacement level, which has resulted in the mass immigration of third worlders who are too often MUCH more primitive than we were in the 50s when it comes to women.

Feminism is 100% misandry. Ironically, 'feminism' has taken the feminine out of women.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Feminism is 100% misandry. Ironically, 'feminism' has taken the feminine out of women.

The cliche "Modern woman" is VERY masculine. Chesty, abrasive, aggressive, etc. Marriages are supposed to be a ying and yang, not 2 yings or 2 yangs. Feminism wants women to act like men. Girl boss, girl power, etc.

 

[initforme]

Modern women often have shed the natural call to sacrifice for human society. We've developed a narrative that women need to seek happiness first, and if that means women who are in the fence about kids being pulled into party/feminist/sexual revolution zones or women splitting households because they aren't happy... it all F's up our society. Men generally feel a call to protect the nation or people... they run to the front lines, it's how they are programmed. Women are supposed to be the glue of the family, and feminism is encouraging them to bail.

How are women supposed to sacrifice for human society? A bizarre statement. No wonder they reject such a foolish statement.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

How are women supposed to sacrifice for human society?

By baring children and supporting/complimenting their husbands.
1. We need to procreate to survive. Saying celebrated cliches such as "I don't need a man" is against this
2. Men are generally better at building society and have a monopoly on force. Thus, women can try to chest up to men and try to overpower them by nature/communication (which they'll lose, yet feminism encourages), or they can correctly acknowledge areas where men are generally superior and use that to their advantage (aka being powerfully feminine)
3. And to preempt your sprint to the exception, I'm talking about generalities, not if your sister's cousin was different.

 

[initforme]

By baring children and supporting/complimenting their husbands.
1. We need to procreate to survive. Saying celebrated cliches such as "I don't need a man" is against this
2. Men are generally better at building society and have a monopoly on force. Thus, women can try to chest up to men and try to overpower them by nature/communication (which they'll lose, yet feminism encourages), or they can correctly acknowledge areas where men are generally superior and use that to their advantage (aka being powerfully feminine)
3. And to preempt your sprint to the exception, I'm talking about generalities, not if your sister's cousin was different.

Women are bearing children and providing your beloved sacrifice. Its just a growing number prefer another route in life. Its NOT an issue nor problem. Having kids its a choice, not a duty, not a responsibility, and not an expectation. Have kids if a woman WANTS them, not because society tells them. You totally left about being financially capable of supporting kids. People are having less kids because frankly they are expensive and if people cant afford them do you want them having kids they cannot afford to raise?

 

[DonGlock26]

That's the catch 22 isn't it.

Women, especially white middle class ones, tend to vote for the emotional issues and gush with sympathy...

I heard someone who while wanting to stand up for women, also say that they could also stand by and let men invade women's spaces/sports etc... because overall women have caused it by their voting and social stances.

Once again, it seems that men are the ones who have to come in and protect women... just as we always have... even if it's from their emotional tugs.

You are absolutely right.

 

[initforme]

You are absolutely right.

However the effect overall is miniscule.

 

[DonGlock26]

However the effect overall is miniscule.

What is miniscule?

 

[initforme]

What is miniscule?

The effects of feminism. Women are still having kids and getting married(although half of those marriages fail).

 

[DonGlock26]

The effects of feminism. Women are still having kids and getting married(although half of those marriages fail).

Having kids in wedlock at what rate? Are half of those marriages failing due to feminism and no fault divorce?
Just who is filing for all those divorces?