Conservative Birth Rate Is 50% Higher Than Liberal Birth Rate

Reportedly, the birth rate for Conservative women in 2025 is 2.18, above the replacement rate of approximately 2.1.

The birth rate for Liberal women (birthing people?) was only 1.42, well below the replacement value of about 2.1.

View attachment 1183530

Link (no paywall)

This has significant implications, obviously. Eventually, a group with such a low birth rate dies out if the children have the same characteristics as the parents.

One has to wonder if the combination of Liberal policies contributes to such a low rate. Liberals have more abortions, are more likely to be gay, less likely to be in traditional family relationships, and more likely to believe that humans are causing irreparable harm to the planet.

Liberals would probably tell you that the low birth rate comes with more education and affluence, pointing to lower birth rates in the Western world than the third world...

View attachment 1183534

I'm a bit skeptical of that, as smart, happy, rich people tend to be better equipped for supporting large families.

And this map by state muddies the water a bit (most states follow the trend, but there are outliers like Hawaii and West Virginia)...

View attachment 1183539

Same map with 2024 election result map:
View attachment 1183539View attachment 1183552

I wonder if this is an interesting example of Darwin's survival of the fittest, but applied to mental state as opposed to purely physical traits. In this case, harmful or less desirable ideologies are less likely to reproduce and get passed on.
:eusa_shhh: shhhh.
 
Happiness is difficult to define. You can't compare the happiness of an ignorant person and an intelligent person, because it will look different.

And someone might be happiest doing things with their family, but make the decision not to have a family because they've decided they're happy without one.
Intelligence is a difficult thing to define. But conservative politicians, for example, are just saying whatever people want to hear. Some liberals will also do that, especially in the US where "Democrat" doesn't mean liberal for, say, Europeans.


"
  • Research shows that more intelligent children in the US and UK are more likely to grow up to be liberals than less intelligent children."
But this is a statistical thing. More intelligent people are more likely to be liberal. More likely to think about things.

So many of the conservatives on this forum are people who don't think. They just have been told what to think. Doesn't mean there aren't liberals like that either. Most of the forum is like that, but those people who are most like to think, are going to hold a pretty center left position.
^^^ What a load of bullshit. This ^^^ is why you idiots lose.
 
ALL sane people who know what’s good for this nation are against a declining birth rate amongst Caucasians…ALL sane people who know what’s good for this nation are FOR a declining birth rate amongst ALL dark people. Ain’t that right Unkotare ?
WRONG, racist *****.
 
Simple explanation:

1763167695571.webp
 
Reportedly, the birth rate for Conservative women in 2025 is 2.18, above the replacement rate of approximately 2.1.

The birth rate for Liberal women (birthing people?) was only 1.42, well below the replacement value of about 2.1.

View attachment 1183530

Link (no paywall)

This has significant implications, obviously. Eventually, a group with such a low birth rate dies out if the children have the same characteristics as the parents.

One has to wonder if the combination of Liberal policies contributes to such a low rate. Liberals have more abortions, are more likely to be gay, less likely to be in traditional family relationships, and more likely to believe that humans are causing irreparable harm to the planet.

Liberals would probably tell you that the low birth rate comes with more education and affluence, pointing to lower birth rates in the Western world than the third world...

View attachment 1183534

I'm a bit skeptical of that, as smart, happy, rich people tend to be better equipped for supporting large families.

And this map by state muddies the water a bit (most states follow the trend, but there are outliers like Hawaii and West Virginia)...

View attachment 1183539

Same map with 2024 election result map:
View attachment 1183539View attachment 1183552

I wonder if this is an interesting example of Darwin's survival of the fittest, but applied to mental state as opposed to purely physical traits. In this case, harmful or less desirable ideologies are less likely to reproduce and get passed on.



Libs don't know what a woman is, so this is not surprising.




...
 
We don't have universal healthcare for anyone. We do have tax breaks for billionaires.
Lots of blame there.

Both parties
Insurance companies
Hospitals
Doctors
Lobbyists

All of them want a piece of the pie whereas the little people lick pan. The blame doesn't end there. People choose to live unhealthy lifestyle are also to blame. Those who milk the system, able bodies, sitting a home while sucking on government dough are guilty as well. Free healthcare for illegal aliens, yeah, they too are part of the problem. Let's add pharmaceutical industry too.
 
I TOLD YOU nature has selected the left for extinction. Soon enough they will be gone and forgotten.
I kind of thought that would be the case after the Berlin Wall fell. Sadly it seems we are raising idiots faster than we can teach not to be idiots.
 
Reportedly, the birth rate for Conservative women in 2025 is 2.18, above the replacement rate of approximately 2.1.

The birth rate for Liberal women (birthing people?) was only 1.42, well below the replacement value of about 2.1.

View attachment 1183530

Link (no paywall)

This has significant implications, obviously. Eventually, a group with such a low birth rate dies out if the children have the same characteristics as the parents.

One has to wonder if the combination of Liberal policies contributes to such a low rate. Liberals have more abortions, are more likely to be gay, less likely to be in traditional family relationships, and more likely to believe that humans are causing irreparable harm to the planet.

Liberals would probably tell you that the low birth rate comes with more education and affluence, pointing to lower birth rates in the Western world than the third world...

View attachment 1183534

I'm a bit skeptical of that, as smart, happy, rich people tend to be better equipped for supporting large families.

And this map by state muddies the water a bit (most states follow the trend, but there are outliers like Hawaii and West Virginia)...

View attachment 1183539

Same map with 2024 election result map:
View attachment 1183539View attachment 1183552

I wonder if this is an interesting example of Darwin's survival of the fittest, but applied to mental state as opposed to purely physical traits. In this case, harmful or less desirable ideologies are less likely to reproduce and get passed on.
Idiocracy
 
Reportedly, the birth rate for Conservative women in 2025 is 2.18, above the replacement rate of approximately 2.1.

The birth rate for Liberal women (birthing people?) was only 1.42, well below the replacement value of about 2.1.

View attachment 1183530

Link (no paywall)

This has significant implications, obviously. Eventually, a group with such a low birth rate dies out if the children have the same characteristics as the parents.

One has to wonder if the combination of Liberal policies contributes to such a low rate. Liberals have more abortions, are more likely to be gay, less likely to be in traditional family relationships, and more likely to believe that humans are causing irreparable harm to the planet.

Liberals would probably tell you that the low birth rate comes with more education and affluence, pointing to lower birth rates in the Western world than the third world...

View attachment 1183534

I'm a bit skeptical of that, as smart, happy, rich people tend to be better equipped for supporting large families.

And this map by state muddies the water a bit (most states follow the trend, but there are outliers like Hawaii and West Virginia)...

View attachment 1183539

Same map with 2024 election result map:
View attachment 1183539View attachment 1183552

I wonder if this is an interesting example of Darwin's survival of the fittest, but applied to mental state as opposed to purely physical traits. In this case, harmful or less desirable ideologies are less likely to reproduce and get passed on.

^ Islam is the most conservative and growing religion in the world so I suppose you should convert or else you're a liberal
 
15th post

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom